Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

nyt: Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Concealing Evidence in Terror Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:14 PM
Original message
nyt: Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Concealing Evidence in Terror Case
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
Published: March 29, 2006
WASHINGTON, March 29 — A grand jury charged today that a former federal prosecutor in Detroit who led one of the Justice Department's biggest terrorism investigations concealed critical evidence in the case in an effort to bolster the government's theory that a group of local Muslim men were plotting an attack.

The prosecutor, Richard G. Convertino, and a State Department employee who served as a chief government witness were each indicted on charges of conspiracy and obstruction of justice. The grand jury charged that they had conspired to conceal evidence from the jury about photographs of an American military hospital in Jordan that was the supposed target of a terrorist plot concocted by the Detroit defendants.

Mr. Convertino, once a rising star at the Justice Department who fell out of favor with supervisors in Washington, denied that he had ever withheld evidence, and he pledged that he would be vindicated. "These charges are clearly vindictive and retaliatory, and it's an effort to discredit and smear someone who tried to expose the government's mismanagement of the war on terrorism," he said in a telephone interview.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/national/29cnd-prosecutor.html?hp&ex=1143694800&en=d62b75b90c87e7af&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. BushCo. = cheaters & liars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. More "Family Values"?
As a political party, I have to say that the Republicans have no honor. Hypocrites, every damn one of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sheer criminality and incompetence to win at all costs...
this is why the * cabal war on terror is an utter failure.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yay!
We need a lot more cases like this, especially in Washington and New York! There were many who concealed or destroyed evidence and obstructed justice after 9/11!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Patsy?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. War on "terror" appears to be more like a war on Muslims methinks . . .
.
.
.

From the posted Article:

After four Muslim men were arrested days after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in a dilapidated Detroit apartment, federal authorities charged that they were part of a "sleeper" terrorist cell plotting attacks against Americans overseas.

Two of the men were convicted on terrorism charges after a high-profile trial in 2003, with Mr. Convertino as the lead prosecutor. But the case soon began to unravel amid allegations of concealed evidence and government misconduct. The Justice Department ultimately repudiated its own case, leading to the dismissal of all terrorism charges against the men in 2004.

"I can't recall a case like this in recent memory where you have not only the collapse of the prosecution's entire case, but now the prosecutor himself indicted,
"The government has made clear it's going to do everything it can to go after terrorism, but here you have a case where it appears that hubris might have intoxicated the prosecutor, and he might have taken one step over the line," Mr. Levin said.

________________________________________________________________________

ONE step over the line??

what the heck would TWO steps be?

OH

Invading and destabilizing a whole country

That would fit . .

(sigh)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC