Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shocks Seen in New Math for Pensions: Companies' net worths wiped out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:40 AM
Original message
Shocks Seen in New Math for Pensions: Companies' net worths wiped out?
NYT: Shocks Seen in New Math for Pensions
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
Published: March 31, 2006

The board that writes accounting rules for American business is proposing a new method of reporting pension obligations that is likely to show that many companies have a lot more debt than was obvious before.

In some cases, particularly at old industrial companies like automakers, the newly disclosed obligations are likely to be so large that they will wipe out the net worth of the company.

The panel, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, said the new method, which it plans to issue today for public comment, would address a widespread complaint about the current pension accounting method: that it exposes shareholders and employees to billions of dollars in risks that they cannot easily see or evaluate. The new accounting rule would also apply to retirees' health plans and other benefits.

A member of the accounting board, George Batavick, said, "We took on this project because the current accounting standards just don't provide complete information about these obligations."...

***

The new method proposed by the accounting board would require companies to take certain pension values they now report deep in the footnotes of their financial statements and move the information onto their balance sheets — where all their assets and liabilities are reflected. The pension values that now appear on corporate balance sheets are almost universally derided as of little use in understanding the status of a company's retirement plan....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/31/business/31pension.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Companies not vesting employees pension funs have fucked
the American labor force. The number of people denied their promised pensions due to poor executive/management decisions is in the many millions.

Historically worker pensions and old age security were very important to the Socialist and Fascist movements. Corporations and the Republicans who serve them need to think seriously about what sort of reservoir of blow-back they are storing up.

The 2K-teens could become a very very ugly time in North America. Millions of boomers retiring and scores more millions of still working generations resentful of having to cover that cost due to corporate irresponsibility.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't forget healthy older boomers taking jobs ordinarily
done by kids to supplement that social security income. We're already seeing granny at the drive up window during school hours. She's going to be there at all hours from now on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. She's been there for quite a while. Nothing new there. BUT...
pretty soon she'll be nudged out by immigrants wiling to work for lower wages.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21.  immigrants working for NO BENEFITS
Their Health care picked up by the taxpayer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Take away pensions, medicare, soc. security and kill off the population
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 01:02 PM by Roland99
What's left?


Fodder for a military, execs to run companies, and enough able-bodied people to man what few factories are left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Like Rummy sez, travel light and fast and have a good looking
corpse when ya die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. send them to the army, there are
no factories left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. The accounting change reflects that net worth never existed.
It was the old value that was the illusion, not the new
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is a good change by FASB.
But it will really have an impact on business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. it damn well should-- they've been hiding this for too long, IMO...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Or using it
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 01:33 PM by AnneD
as a slush fund or till to prop up share price. It is about time it be reflected on the books IN THE OPEN. Now, the next reform is to have the employee pension be first inline as a creditor when the company tanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Not to mention
financing some of the now famous mergers and acquisitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Astronomical salaries given to executives wipe out companies' net worths
Yep, it's the guy working the line that causes the company to go bankrupt.

Not the factory owner making $100 million a year between his salary, benefits, stock options and other perks.


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. From the article
<snip>
Using information in the footnotes of Ford's 2005 financial statements, Ms. Pegg said that if the new rule were already in effect, Ford's balance sheet would reflect about $20 billion more in obligations than it now does. The full recognition of health care promised to Ford's retirees accounts for most of the difference. Ford now reports a net worth of $14 billion. That would be wiped out under the new rule. Ford officials said they had not evaluated the effect of the new accounting rule and therefore could not comment.

Applying the same method to General Motors' balance sheet suggests that if the accounting rule had been in effect at the end of 2005, there would be a swing of about $37 billion. At the end of 2005, the company reported a net worth of $14.6 billion. A G.M. spokesman declined to comment, noting that the new accounting rule had not yet been issued.
<snip>

This is a good thing. It will cause some pain short term, but the companies and those who deal with them (suppliers, unions, employees, investors) need to know exactly where they stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Never did understand why business didn't unite with citizens for
healthcare. Supposedly universal healthcare is expensive. Apparently, so is the alternative:

"The full recognition of health care promised to Ford's retirees accounts for most of the difference."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Health care isn't too expensive at all to the corporations...
... if they can discard all their health care (and pension) obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Social healthcare and remove that burden from corporations.
Setup a very rigid auditing board for the national healthcare program and enforce it like mad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Truth in accounting. A novel concept corps will abhor!!!
fer sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. So where did all that money go that was taken out of the
workers check for their pensions??? and the company advertized that they would get pensions
Be loyal Work hard and you will have a nice pension waiting for you

Where O Where did the money go???

Someday all these Pension fund commissioners are going to be put in jail for stealing...

Labor in America is going to have to rise up again... in Europe its required on the board of their companies that Labor is represented... this is the result of no labor representation on these boards of the companies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clar8130 Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. defined benefit plans
My guess is that the companies that will be hardest hit are those with old defined benefit plans, which did not require workers to contribute.

DB plan accounting is a nightmare, which was hinted at in the article. Since the dotcom crash, there are sooooo many DB plans in trouble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Money was never there
A good portion of it dissappeared in the stock market crash in 2001.

The rest of it was never there in the first place due to bad accounting rules.

Old accounting rules:

Put in $800/yr to pay a pension of $30k in 30 years, assuming a 12% ROI.

New accounting rules:

Put in $3700/yr to pay a pension of $30k in 30 years, assuming a 8% ROI during earning years and 5% during payment years.

Oh yea -- also make up (with interest) all back payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. I read about this a while ago
One of the worst impacts will be on municipal pensions, which will need a cash infusion to comply with the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC