Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Utah Aims to Alter (presidential) Primary Calendar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Terra Terra Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 02:55 PM
Original message
AP: Utah Aims to Alter (presidential) Primary Calendar
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 02:57 PM by Terra Terra
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060331/ap_on_el_pr/western_primary

Utah is fed up with presidential candidates who get no closer than 30,000 feet as they fly over the state. The state isn't necessarily blaming the candidates, but rather a primary calendar that puts it months behind Iowa, New Hampshire and states that typically settle the Democratic and Republican nominations long before the Utah even writes its ballot.

Determined to change the status quo, Utah wants to hold a 2008 presidential primary the first week in February, which would put it on par with about a half dozen states that trail Iowa and New Hampshire, but still are in the thick of the contest.

"If Utah goes on February 5th, all these candidates have to come to Utah early in the schedule," said Mike Stratton, a Democratic strategist who also serves on the party's presidential nomination commission.

Separate from Utah's effort, the Democratic Party is weighing a change in its calendar that would put two caucuses between Iowa and New Hampshire, preferably one from the South and the other from the West.

More at link


When I first saw the headline, I thought they wanted to change the regular calendar and thought "those wacky Mormons!". That's not the case. I've often wondered why Iowa, New Hampshire, etc get to essentially choose the presidential candidates each year.I once read a suggestion that I thought was very well thought out. Have rolling primaries every 4 years by region of the country. For example, break it up into 5 sections, such as the Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Northwest, Southwest, with 10 states in each section. Then, every 4 years, the order in which primaries are held moves to a different section of the country so that every region of the country gets to be first in primaries every 5th election cycle. Just a thought.

edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. 5 electors, guaranteed to go the Republican candidate...
changing the date wont matter one fucking bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think they want a say-so in who the nominee is****
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yeah, they are having wet dreams over Mittens...
"He's like Orrin, but pretty". In any case, Utah is not a barometer of national politics, it's a hard right automation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly! Utah will ALWAYS go repub. Our primaries should be in BLUE or
purple states or states where there is even a marginal chance a Dem could win.

Who gives a shit what the repugs in Utah think of our candidates? (Sorry to my Dem compatriots in Utah - the select few non-Neanderthals).

:crazy:

It is absolutely insane to let IOWA decide who our DEM candidates will be.
Not to mention their f'd up horse-trading, arm-twisting, coercion caucuses.
Sorry Iowa, but I'm a Texan and I would no sooner advocate a deciding Dem primary in my own state.

How is New Hampshire's record on presidential elections? I have a mixed memory of them....
Are they always one way or another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Laughable...
Have you ever ATTENDED a caucus?

Obviously not, based on your little tirade. I would love to explain it to you ALL over again, but how about you just do a flippin search and read up on it.

You say that blue or purple states should start it off...well what the hell do you consider Iowa? Do some research.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. All these states want to be in the first week of February
It's just not realistic unless we turn the primary into a 1 day event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Terra Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree
That's why I think having a different region of the country be first in the primaries each election cycle is a good idea. There is no good reason why the same handful of states should get to choose who the presidential candidates will be every election cycle simply by virtue of having their primaries scheduled earlier than everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it ain't a swing state, who cares?
Just put Hitler on the ballot and we'll know in advance who the winner is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. A few years ago, Washington moved it's presidential primary to Feb...
The result was that both major parties announced that they would ignore the results and instead select delegates to the national convention from party caucuses held in March, making our presidential primaries a huge, meaningless waste of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Their not the only ones
NJ is moving their primary up from June to Feb for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC