Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP in danger of losing control of Congress, Gingrich says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:19 PM
Original message
GOP in danger of losing control of Congress, Gingrich says
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 06:20 PM by sabra

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/14235576.htm

GOP in danger of losing control of Congress, Gingrich says

WASHINGTON - A dozen years after he engineered his party's takeover of Congress, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich warned Friday that his fellow Republicans could be swept out of power themselves.

"They are seen by the country as being in charge of a government that can't function," he told Knight Ridder editors and reporters in a wide-ranging luncheon interview. "We could lose control this fall."

He cited a series of blunders under Republican rule, from failures in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina to mismanagement of the war in Iraq. He said the immigration bill passed by his former colleagues in the House of Representatives is unrealistic and too harsh toward undocumented immigrants, called congressional efforts to regulate lobbying "much too weak" and said the government has squandered billions of dollars in Iraq.

Long known as a provocateur, Gingrich said he was leveling his pointed criticisms to try to shake up his party. "I'm trying to get the government and my party to change this year," he said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. What goes around comes around asshole
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. My thoughts exactly
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Karma!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. My god in heaven can't a nail be found that's long enough to drive
through the heart of this shameless vampire?

You could be on the blogs for a matter of a few days and reach the same conclusion.

More self-promotional codswallop from a disgraced Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. knock on wood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Get them to change? Change what? The best part ... if we take the
congress ... do unto them as they have done to us.

Late night votes, marginalization of minority party committee members etc. etc. With two exceptions, give K street a good scrubbing and scrupulously tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Suck it up, Newty my boy....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, he can't blame the Dems this time!
been 12 years, buddy. That "Contract for America" ain't chillin' with da homies no more, Gingrich.

Why couldn't you politicians change 2 years ago? Or 18 months ago?

Stop the hot air. Show us you are really something.

And I say that for ANY politician these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Newt cites all the things the GOP is doing wrong...
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 06:30 PM by IanDB1
and he doesn't think they deserve to lose control?

The GOP is like Newt's wife with cancer-- time for a divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nutgingrich was banging some women while complaining about Monica
and Clinton. If he decides to run for prez. that will be a big topic. That said. he is a good political anaylist and lets hope he is right. He is been saying this for a while now & I hope they do not listen to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Is that why he left? I recall that Larry Flynt was digging up dirt on Con
gressmen's sex lives and that's why they called off the impeachment proceedings. Wasn't Newt the one who asked for a divorce when his wife was in the hosp with cancer? Nice guy.

The repukes didn't want the Clinton impeachment to go to the Senate b/c more dirt was in the offing, thanks to Larry Flynt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Where's Larry Flynt Now?
We sure could use his courageous exposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I'm not sure when he posted this, but it's good
Get out, Mr. Bush. It's time to leave. We won't ask why you're leaving, whether it's because of incompetence, corruption, treason, criminal negligence or whatever. We just want you to resign and take that war profiteer Dick Cheney with you. We are sick and tired of the Vice President's corrupt cronies at Haliburton getting no-bid contracts to clean up the messes you have made.

Don't try and lie your way out of what happened in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Along with everything else, you were too slow to muzzle the press, to slow to set up your spin machine. Americans have at last seen the truth with their own eyes. They will not be deceived again.

You stole your office both in 2000 and 2004, and consequently have no legitimate claim to it. You lied us into a war that not only has killed 2,000 U.S. troops and 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women and children, but also tied up our national guard when it was desperately needed here. You have gutted our civil rights, defunded the Treasury and put the American people at poverty's doorstep.

Now, with the help of Hurrican Katrina, you have allowed New Orleans-a major city in your own country-to be destroyed. Don't deny it. FEMA's National Response Plan makes it clear that the federal government must be help accountable, not state and municipal governments. In any case, it was you, Mr. Bush, who defunded the levee project that would have protected the Crescent City and its citizens.

We are done with you. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Larry Flynt
Publisher,
HUSTLER Magazine

http://larryflynt.com/statements/leave_office.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. he obviously posted within last year since it mentions Katrina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. It was his aide, of course.
In 1980, Gingrigh asked for a divorce from his first wife--his high school geometry teacher, whom he secretly dated in high school. His reason for asking for a divorce (and trying to discuss it in the hospital while the first wife was recovering from cancer surgery) was because he was already having an affair with his future second wife.

In 1999, Gingrich asked his second wife for a divorce (on Mother's Day, while she was wondering if she had multiple sclerosis) because for the past five years and throughout every single day of the Monica Lewinsky scandal--Gingrich was conducting an affair with Callista Bisek, his $55,000/yr aide. He married her in August, 2000. It is theorized that Dick Armey and Tom Delay threatened to expose this relationship (a relationship that even I--a lowly paralegal--heard about before the impeachment of Bill Clinton) to the press and that, rather than his psychotic behavior in the House, is what forced his retirement.

Interestingly, Victoria Toensing, who has been rightly villified here at DU as a right wing shill for white collar criminals of a certain pachydermal ilk, represented Newt's second wife in the divorce proceedings. Toensing has more recently weighed in in favor of the perpetrators in the burning of Valerie Plame Wilson.

Here's a picture of Newt with his new (or perhaps soon to be traded in) wife and some no-talent hack:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. thanks for digging the dirt on Nut Gingrich, sofaking! Wife #3 is young
Edited on Sat Apr-01-06 03:59 PM by wordpix2
enough to be Nut's daughter, maybe even granddaughter. Ewww!

Just let this jackass run for pres. hahahaha, that will be lots of fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Newt Should Be Calling For Impeachment
It's the only thing that would save the GOP bacon, frankly.

I doubt that GOPpers have the vision or guts to pull it off, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. I think this time we are letting them suicide.
No more free passes, like the New Deal (where FDR saved Capitalism from itself), Warren Commission, Watergate (I believe that Nixon resigning was a pass to save the Republican Party) and Iran-Contra and BCCI (which Clinton dropped because he wanted to heal the country after the ravages of Reagan-Bush :eyes:), and of course the 9/11 Commission.
We'll see how the other current investigations turn out, but I am hoping their free ride is over.
They've been rotten from corruption a long time, time to pull the plug, hold the funeral and bury the corpse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gingrich is a whore running for President. Nothing he says has
any value. He is the prick that poisoned bipartisanship that ruined this country. Screw him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree. If he wants to know what's wrong with the country he should
look in a mirror.

He is the orginal hypocrite. But for once in his pathetic criminal life, he may be right. If the Repukes are not voted out of office, they will so destroy the country that it will disintegrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. They ARE in charge of a government that can't function. Duh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. They aren't going to turn things around by Nov., they've screwed up
way too badly for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo - Language: A Key Mechanism of Control
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4443.htm

Optimistic Positive Governing Words
Use the list below to help define your campaign and your vision of public service. These words can help give extra power to your message. In addition, these words help develop the positive side of the contrast you should create with your opponent, giving your community something to vote for!

active(ly)
activist
building
candid(ly)
care(ing)
challenge
change
children
choice/choose
citizen
commitment
common sense
compete
confident

<snip>

family
freedom
hard work

<snip>

Contrasting Words
Often we search hard for words to define our opponents. Sometimes we are hesitant to use contrast. Remember that creating a difference helps you. These are powerful words that can create a clear and easily understood contrast. Apply these to the opponent, their record, proposals and their party.

abuse of power
anti- (issue): flag, family, child, jobs
betray
bizarre
bosses
bureaucracy
cheat
coercion
"compassion" is not enough
collapse(ing)
consequences
corrupt
corruption
criminal rights
crisis
cynicism
decay

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. bwahahaha - all the "contrasting words" describe repukes perfectly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. First thing that we should do when we get back in...
is to re-open the House Bank.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree with him
Gingrich is absolutely correct, he's nailed it, except for the Impeachment part which would just be a bandaid with another scumbag slipping into the corporate musical chair..

I hate to agree with him, but he's nailed these guys :)

Now, if we took him and all the rest of the scumbags running this country and tossed them into a volcano, along with a virgin for good luck, we'd all be a lot better off..

(This is satirical Mr Gonzales, I mean no harm to anyone, by the way, don't you have a Mexican Flag to BURN?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. it's the logical outcome of the contract on america
Newtie boy.... you reap what you sow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. LOL!!! "Contract ON America!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'll add this too Bush didn't deliver and will NEVER Deliver
the Christian fundies the Abortion Issue... He NEVER intended getting rid of it... and Republicans will use the issue again

but the Fundies have to realize they gave them control of Congress Supreme court and presidency and we still have Abortion

When will it sink into these peoples heads they have been betrayed and used...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's kind of cool how the republicans are scared of the dems all the time.
Even when they have both houses and the presidency, fear prevails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. So if he wants to change his party....
Ok, let's quote him...

Long known as a provocateur, Gingrich said he was leveling his pointed criticisms to try to shake up his party. "I'm trying to get the government and my party to change this year," he said.


Well, if he wants the government and his party to change this year then he needs to change his party affiliation to Democratic! That would be the easiest way for him to get his party to change this year, by changing the party he supports himself - and if by hook or by crook (more likely by crook) the Republicans win in '06, well 1 out of 2 isn't bad then is it?

(ok, shall I duck for cover now?)

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's too late. They betrayed the U.S. and they must pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Who cares what he thinks?
And what about the "blunder" that knocked HIM out of politics: carrying on a ten-year affair while persecuting Clinton over a single sexual indiscretion?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. They can only fool the required number of gullible working people
to gain the reins of power every generation or so.

Then there is a big steaming pile of crap left for the Democrats to clean up.

Why must we repeat this process over and over again??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think it will happen. Please take this poll
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=806022&mesg_id=806022

Also, according to Charlie Cook the Dems won't win in '06

http://cookpolitical.com/overview/2006.php


The number of open seats that any party has to defend is the biggest predictor of how many seats that party could lose in the upcoming election. As of mid-December, there were just 21 open seats (14 Republicans and 7 Democrats). Of those 14 GOP seats, just three of them are highly vulnerable: AZ-08 (Jim Kolbe), CO-07 (Bob Beauprez) and IA-01 (Jim Nussle). There are three more open seats that are competitive but lean Republican: CA-50 (Duke Cunningham), MN-06 (Mark Kennedy) and WI-08 (Mark Green). A big question today is how many of the four seats that are currently rated as Likely Republican end up coming into play. For example, Democrats are playing hard in IL-06, the Republican-leaning suburban Chicago district where longtime GOP Rep. Henry Hyde is retiring. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rahm Emanuel, who represents a Chicago district, has recruited Iraq war veteran Tammy Duckworth into the contest.

Democrats have fewer open seat vulnerabilities, but they do have one seat in toss-up, OH-06 (Ted Strickland) and one that Leans Democratic, VT-AL (Bernie Sanders).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. I would be interested in knowing what voting equipment
AZ 08, CO 07 and IA 01 are using for their voter reg database AND for casting their ballots. Bookmarking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Okay, IA-01 is mostly Diebold DREs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Can't find specific equipment in AZ-08 but Sec of State's site
notes a requirement for a reciept when casting an electronic ballot. Hmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. CO-07 is a combination of touchscreen and op scan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. "They are seen by the country as being in charge of a government that can'
That's putting it mildly. Thanks for the light of hope, sabra.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC