Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT/Reuters: US Auditors Fault Pentagon on Bang for Buck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:30 PM
Original message
NYT/Reuters: US Auditors Fault Pentagon on Bang for Buck
US Auditors Fault Pentagon on Bang for Buck
By REUTERS
Published: March 31, 2006

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The projected cost of major U.S. weapons has doubled under President George W. Bush to nearly $1.4 trillion, but the Pentagon is not getting enough bang for its buck, congressional investigators said in a report on Friday.

In the fourth annual assessment of its kind, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congress's audit and investigative arm, found ``no appreciable improvement'' in how warplanes, ships and other arms are bought.

"Rather, programs are experiencing recurring problems with cost overruns, missed deadlines and performance shortfalls," GAO said in a review of 52 projects.

The cost of developing a weapons system often tops estimates by 30 to 40 percent, it said.

Among things highlighted as contributing to cost increases were the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, under development by Lockheed Martin Corp., and the Army's centerpiece Future Combat Systems, overseen by Boeing Co....

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-arms-pentagon-report.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. U.S. auditors fault Pentagon on bang for buck
http://today.reuters.com/misc/PrinterFriendlyPopup.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=uri:2006-04-01T023659Z_01_N31171886_RTRIDST_0_ARMS-PENTAGON-REPORT-UPDATE-1.XML

WASHINGTON, March 31 (Reuters) - The projected cost of major U.S. weapons has doubled under President George W. Bush to nearly $1.4 trillion, but the Pentagon is not getting enough bang for its buck, congressional investigators said in a report on Friday.

In the fourth annual assessment of its kind, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congress's audit and investigative arm, found "no appreciable improvement" in how warplanes, ships and other arms are bought.

"Rather, programs are experiencing recurring problems with cost overruns, missed deadlines and performance shortfalls," GAO said in a review of 52 projects.

<snip>

Overall, the Defense Department doubled planned investments in new weapons systems over the past five years from $700 billion in 2001, when President Bush took office, to $1.4 trillion, the 141-page report said.

"This huge increase has not been accompanied by more stability, better outcomes or more buying power for the acquisition dollar," Comptroller General David Walker, the GAO director, said in a cover letter to lawmakers.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This has to be some sort of joke.
The pentagon is in the business of pissing money away. They never saw a deadline they could not ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...nor a faulty weapons program that needed building.
Beyond the basic military hardware, the rest is mostly a ponzi scheme; with John/Jane Q. Public at the base of the pyramid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC