Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plane with U.S. officials was fired at (by missile...in Iraq)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:22 AM
Original message
Plane with U.S. officials was fired at (by missile...in Iraq)
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 01:22 AM by Roland99
Plane with U.S. officials was fired at
House members say C-130's defenses repelled missile; Boxer argues for similar equipment on commercial jets
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/08/MNGESI60LE1.DTL&feed=rss.news

In January, a six-member delegation of the House Armed Services Committee, led by Rob Simmons, R-Conn., came under missile attack as they traveled "lights out" on a military plane from Baghdad to Kuwait, according to three members of that delegation.

...

According to those same sources, the missile was deflected by the plane's countermeasures -- based on technology Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and other lawmakers have been seeking for commercial airliners.

...

"We had a scare in Los Angeles last year when an American Airlines pilot reported seeing a rocket right after takeoff. Authorities couldn't rule out the possibility it was a shoulder-fired missile," she said. "We had a scare in Iraq in January, when my colleagues said they believed a shoulder-fired missile was fired at their plane."

According to Boxer, two companies have developed countermeasure systems for use on commercial aircraft that can be installed for less than a million dollars per plane.


Uhhh..."a scare in Los Angeles", Senator? Where did that rocket land, Senator? What damage was caused, Senator?

We're going to beef up some military contractor over "a scare"?

And who's to say that plane of Representative's was actually fired upon by a missile and not something the military concocted to drum up support for more defense programs? :tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Take the tinfoil off
A Stinger or other portable SAM would be the easiest way to kill 300 people with the press of a button. Any money spent for countermeasures on civ aircraft is well worth it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would have no doubt the air over I raq is dangerous and they have lost
plenty of helicopters just a week ago a top of the line Apache attack helicopter more than likely by a shoulder fired sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. If it was a dummy rocket like an RPG, did the C-130 do a barrel roll?
What goes up must come down. Where the F is it? Did it land in the Pacific?

"We had a scare in Los Angeles last year when an American Airlines pilot reported seeing a rocket right after takeoff.

My thoughts exactly.:tinfoilhat:


And who's to say that plane of Representative's was actually fired upon by a missile and not something the military concocted to drum up support for more defense programs? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. A RPG-7 will self destruct after about 600 Meters
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 09:22 AM by formercia
the copper jet from the shaped charge warhead will travel a couple of hundred Meters more. From personal observation, the copper jet will penetrate about 13 mm of steel plate 100 Meters beyond the detonation.
The tracer element in the RPG is very bright and might be mistaken for a SAM.

The Insurgents commonly fire volleys of RPG's at low-flying aircraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. if it's true it shows that the Iraqui resistance has a darnn good
intelligence

because you don't stand in the desert with a SA18 on the shoulder and wait that something "lights out" flies by... The knew who was aboard, the route and the time



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igla
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Yep, they're getting more sophisticated...just like Nam n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, eff that. While we're at it, why don't we make our autos crashproof?
And our curbs accident proof?
And our bathrooms drunken fool-proof?
And lighters and matches fire-proof?

How much money do you want to spend?

Even with all the money in the world, the Airlines would screw it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Seriously...making cars less dangerous would be idiotic! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Let's Make Elections Idiot-Proof
then all the other problems will take care of themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostexpectation Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. what are teh countermeasures?
chaf etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. jamming, flares, decoys
but the average kill is between 0,2 - 0,5. Which means that if the measures are not set in time you have 50% chances to crash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. And chaff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I never heard about the LA rocket
was that ever on the news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wise Doubter Donating Member (458 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It was actually at Long Beach Municipal
I remember seeing it ONCE on the news. It was last summer?

I was concerned because my g/f was flying out of there the following week.

I always fly out of Long Beach. Easy in & out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. They never identified that pilot who crashed near the LB habor
from what I saw he smacked into a few containers but was taken out alive but the plane looked smashed up anyway I saw it once breaking on the local news and that was the end of it after that I never heard of the story again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Was there an investigation?
What was the outcome? Surely if a rocket was fired, there should have been more than just local interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. I would be surprised if...
a shoulder launched SAM could take down a large commercial ariliner. They just dont have that much of a warhead. In fact I believe a 747 or some other large airliner got hit on the way into Baghdad airport. An engine was set on fire, but other than that, not much damage.

On top of that there are no counter-measures really. Shoulder launched missiles are infrared guided, so you cant use a radar warning receiver. In fact you pretty much have to actually SEE the missile launch to have any hope of defeating it. So unless they are gonna have specially trained lookouts on airliners, there is nothing they can really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. If you could take out an engine while it was taking off and flying slow ..
there is a good chance you could induce a stall, making it crash. But if the plane had adequate speed, you are right that it would most likely survive.

However, the psychological impact on the traveling public and the resulting economic impact as many refused to fly would be great whether the plane crashed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I believe most multi engine aircraft are designed...
to lose one or more engines on takeoff and still be able to land safely. In fact the 747 can lose 3 engines mid Atlantic and still make it home. Its not good for the engine (most likely result in it being scrapped) but it can do it.

In any case, there is nothing you can really do about it. Military aircraft keep getting shot down even though they have these systems, so what makes people think airliners would be any better off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. There used to be an effective counter measure available.
But it has already been wasted, flushed down the neocon toilet.

It was to avoid turning other countries into enemies, and to not pour fertilizer on the land after planting the seeds of terrorism there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. agree.
bush gang are a bunch of stupid fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. Boxer, that's another giveaway to Boeing/Raytheon/Honeywell/et al
Who's going to pay for it? The airlines certainly can't.

Instead lets change our stupid foreign policy. Putting "countermeasures" on commercial aircraft isn't going to fix the root cause of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. The Bush admin has been warned time & again
I'll bet $$ that this will be the next menace. . . . Just imagine the carnage if this were done in a more than one city at the same time. . . What are they waiting for to equip planes with some protection? ** is probably keeping his fingers crossed, praying for a way to get his shitty ratings back up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. I still like the parachute idea the most . . .
Put a giant parachute on the plane and float down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
25. Somehow I think we'd have heard about it in January
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 09:40 AM by superconnected
if it were true.

It's Propaganda for war. The War is propaganda for defense companies.

Anything else, like... "how dare they shoot at us over THEIR air space", is ridiculous. They damn well ought to. But I doubt they did.

The LA rocket incident, isn't worth focusing on. I could only guess that one of the choppers that went down in California last year, contained the US soldier that shot it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC