When it's used as an excuse to impose draconian punishments for misdemeanors.
News.com is reporting that Gary McKinnon, the British hacker who broke into NASA computers back in 2002, faces incarceration in Gitmo and up to 60 years in jail if he is extradited to the US and convicted.
While McKinnon may be a bit of a sad case (by his own admission), he maintains that he was searching the NASA machines for evidence they'd covered up the existence of extraterrestrial life. Clearly, this is the kind of guy the 'War on Terror' is meant to stop.
This looks to me like a classic example of scapegoating. "We can't catch Osama, we can't pacify Iraq, Afghanistan is a mess. What can we do? I know, come down like a ton of bricks on some geeks who want to contact ET."
Here's the link to the story:
http://news.com.com/Alleged+NASA+hacker+to+hear+fate+next+month/2100-7349_3-6060524.html?tag=nefd.topQuite apart from the merits of this case, it is a clear example of the extention of powers created to combat terrorists into the ordinary criminal justice sphere. How long will it be before every offence is reclassified as terrorism? Kid puts a cherrybomb down a high school toilet? He's a terrorist. Take part in a mass demonstration? Terrorist conspiracy. Post anti-government information on political forums? Incitement to terror.
In a few years, when it becomes obvious to even the most purblind freeper that we are living in a fascist state, we can point to this case as one of the early warning signs.
As ol' Ben said "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither."