Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Finnerty (charged lacrosse player) charged with assault in D.C.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:42 AM
Original message
Finnerty (charged lacrosse player) charged with assault in D.C.
News&Observer: Finnerty charged with assault in D.C.

Collin Finnerty, one of two Duke University lacrosse players charged in the reported rape of a dancer at a March 13 party, has been arrested before.

Finnerty, a lanky sophomore attackman from Chaminade High School, an all-boys Catholic academy in Mineola, N.Y., was arrested last November on assault charges in Washington, D.C.

On March 23, the same day he was ordered to provide DNA samples in Durham for the gang rape investigation, Finnerty was in Washington to face a misdemeanor charge of simple assault.

According to court records, Finnerty and two former Chaminade teammates attacked a man who was driving by The Georgetown Inn on Wisconsin Avenue in the early hours of Nov. 5, "busting his lip and bruising his chin."

The man said that he told them to stop "calling him gay and ... derogatory names."...

http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/429880.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. FYI Southern Bashing Folks
Both the charged are from the North East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ah, but they CHOSE to go to the south
I can't blame someone for where they were born, just where they choose to go. They could easily have played LAX at Hopkins, Syracuse or Princeton, but no, they had to go to the Confederacy.

it's as logical as your statement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Scholarships?
Just getting tired of hearing the whole southern racial crap. Like I never heard a racial slur in NY state or NJ.

Duke is a better school than both any way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. not for Lacrosse
Syracuse and Hopkins are the gold standards, with Princeton right behind. And I don't think most would agree that Duke undergrad outpaces Princeton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I would. Undergrad that is..(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. "Syracuse and Hopkins are the gold standards, Princeton right behind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
77. yes, it's a down year.
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 11:16 PM by northzax
but in the last 34 years, hopkins has 8 titles, Syracuse has 8, Princeton has 6, North Carolina has 4, no one else has more than two (and that's Cornell and Virginia). Hopkins (full disclosure, it's my graduate school Alma Mater) has 46 titles in the last 75 years. plus, Syracuse has the best player ever, and there are two candidates.

that's 22 of the last 34 titles, not bad. Add in Virginia, Cornell and Carolina, and the last champion, outside that group, was Maryland in 75.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #77
80. I have yet to see Hopkins play
I'm in northern VA, and the thought of driving across DC and then across Baltimore too to get to Homewood alwasy gives me pause. Last year was their year; this year not so much.

Best wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Oh for pete's sake...


Just because these guys attend a college in "The Confederacy" DOES NOT, let me repeat that, DOES NOT MEAN THAT ALL SOUTHERNERS ARE RACIST MYSOGYNISTIC ASSHOLES

BTW, did you know that one of the biggest areas of KKK activity in the 1800s was in Indiana-- a "Yankee" state? Did you also know that lynching was also common in the north in the 1800s, NOT just in the south?

Your southern-bashing is quite repulsive, and is just as bad as the neocon bashing of the Northeast. And it makes you look no better than the intolerant asses we're supposed to be fighting against.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. yes, it does
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 03:39 PM by northzax
obviously. and no amount of posting cute pictures will change anything.

of course lynching was common in the North in the 1880s, of course, it was just as common in the South 80 years later. And there were slaves in the North in 1800, as many as in the South. Of course, the North changed voluntarily, the South needed to lose a war. purely the same, no doubt.

hey, if you want to take this shit seriously and throw out meaningless and irrelevant statistics, and use selective reading to make a point, so can I. watch:

no name no slogan:

ALL SOUTHERNERS ARE RACIST MYSOGYNISTIC ASSHOLES


How dare you! see? it's fun. Lesson learned: context is everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Glad you got your jollies
but your tedious efforts at pigeonholing and stereotyping a part of the country are not doing anybody any good.

Sorry if you think that all racism and classism in this country are confined to the area south of the Mason-Dixon line. I'd invite you up to my lily-white neck of the woods and dispell that notion from your mind forthwith, but I would not want you (or your bass-ackward redneck ilk) in my home.

Good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I sincerely apologize
for responding to a humorous post with humor. I forgot that the famous Southern sense of humor doesn't extend to ridicule of sacred cows. If you did not see the humor, then I apologize.

By the way, I'm from the Northeast, feel free to mock it all you want, we can take it. I am a New-England born, east-coast, overeducated academic egghead. I'm exactly what the Freepers say I am, and so are many of my friends and family. And we get called names by them (as a resident of DC now, I deal with everone saying how bad DC is, and yet, somehow, I get out of bed in the morning). I've also been a granola-eating latter day dead-head hippie from Oregon. Mock that as well. I sure do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Sorry-- no offense taken, none intended
Lifelong Minnesotan here-- possibly the only state that's more liberal than Taxachussetts (in fact, we're the only state that got bluer in 2004 than in 2000). Minnesota still has a Confederate battle flag it "won" in the Civil War from some regiment in Virginia. Every few years we get a request to return it, but the state still won't give it back. Seems kind of dumb to fight over a trophy from a war that happened 150 years ago, but you know how that goes.
:thumbsup: :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
78. Neither of you is as liberal as California!
B-) We even have dumb rednecks here. So our point is?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
74. And the KKK is alive and well in Sunny California


:( to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. Yep, that is sad but true! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. These are really sick puppies....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. The gull of this bastard-to not even be at the party during the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. How far up your ass does the defense attorney's hand go?
I swear, you're worse than a Whack-A-Mole. Or better yet, a parrot. "Braaaaack! Photos show she was drunk when she arrived! Braaaaack!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Actually, photos show he was not there when she was drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Oh, you've seen the photos?
and just because he isn't in them doesn't mean he isn't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Apparently for you, no fact could indicate that he, in fact,
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 04:02 PM by lizzy
could be innocent. What particular evidence against him shows he did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
59. You're cracking me up, Fred!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Thank you
as you know, I'll be here all week...tip your waitresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. I never said he was guilty. I am questioning what the defense is saying
and what *you* keep posting about this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. you seem to have some vested interest in this guy
getting off. What gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
66. I don't want innocent people go in prison for crimes they did not
commit. Is that good enough a reason for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. what makes you think they are innocent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. That's a pretty bird. However, you should let the parrot's on
fantasy island alone-

;)

Let her enjoy her trip by herself, honestly. If she believes her own crap...then you don't want to get yourself involved--if she doesn't, then she is just trying to push posters over the edge.

Walk away!

no, run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. LOL!!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. Do you know this guy personally
or do you defend all accused rapist like this, and attack the victim and the doctors the victim sees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
53. Unless the bank card was surgically attached to his hand,
that is not proof that he wasn't there. ANYBODY else could have used the ATM. Now, if there are pictures of him using the ATM at the exact time the assault was allegedly taking place, that's different. But the defense attorneys don't mention anything about that.

Oh, and BTW, just because there isn't a picture of him at the party doesn't mean he wasn't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. Oh yeah, one more thing
If he truly wasn't at the party and had concrete evidence to prove this...why submit to a DNA test?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrownOak Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. This may be a little too far outside your viewpoint
but try to set your preconceived notions aside for a moment and work from the perspective the guy's friends who were at the party that evening tell him that nothing happened and that he believe them. What does he have to lose by holding back? He knows he's innocent, he knows he has the concrete evidence to support that. So sure, he could step forward and remove his name from the pool of suspects. But since he trusts these guys when they tell him nothing happened and he knows that the alleged victim is going to name one of his friends whom he believes is innocent, why help her narrow the field?

If the guys who weren't at the party tipped their hands early, instead of having to choose three out of 46 guys with maybe 15 of them not at the party, the alleged victim would be choosing 3 out of 31 guys with all of them at the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. You're right....it is a little too far outside my viewpoint
as well as being a million miles away from rational thought.

What does he have to lose by holding back? Well, to start, his clean record now that he's been arraigned on felony counts of kidnapping, rape and sodomy. So much for loyalty to the boys.

So, when the call came in to provide a DNA sample, he thought helping his "innocent" teammates was more important than clearing his name? Who's advising him....My Cousin Vinny?

My guess is that this guy will say he was intimidated into joining the stonewalling of the investigation and only now does he feel that he has to clear his name. Too bad his conscience didn't kick in before he was fitted for a number and a mugshot.

Once again, the world's smallest violin is playing for this asshole :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrownOak Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. Rational Thought
Why is it rational to assume that 47 guys would uniformly lie to protect someone who is guilty without one of them rolling over to save his own butt.

As for his clean record,if he can in fact prove he was not at the party and is not convicted, it's not that difficult in the State of NC to get an expungement.

Here's a better question though, at what level in the courtroom would you believe an alibi that the defense put forward? Would you believe with witnesses? Would you believe with an ATM receipt? Would you believe with a video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. It's rational because it happens every day in every city and town
and we're seeing it play out in this case....initially, the players formed a stonewall in the face of the investigation to protect their own. Now, we can reasonably assume that the DA has a cooperating witness (either a teammate or a party attendee) who probably handed him the "let's kill and skin some strippers" e-mail.

It's not that difficult to clear your criminal record in North Carolina? I bet it's no stroll in the park either. Here's what would have been the least difficult and damaging act of all...clear your name when you have the chance!

Find me one criminal defense attorney who would think this is a cogent strategy...sit on evidence that clears your client, let him refuse to cooperate with the investigation at a point where he's not compelled to do anything, let him submit a DNA test when the court orders him to, let him get charged and put through the system and only then, unveil this shocking evidence.

I'm not believing this bullshit because there isn't a criminal defense lawyer in this country who would be this stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. His father has appeared on CNBC/Bear Sterns Securities Investment.


Finnerty is from Garden City, N.Y., a fairly affluent Long Island bedroom community about 26 miles east of New York City. His father, Kevin J. Finnerty, is a senior official with Bear Stearns, a securities trading, investment banking and brokerage firm with headquarters in New York.

Finnerty graduated from Chaminade in 2004 and made the East roster for the National High School Senior Showcase sponsored by U.S. Lacrosse, the national governing body for the sport.

According to the 2005 Duke University lacrosse team guide, Finnerty was an all-conference player at Chaminade. He scored 48 goals and had 22 assists during his senior year at the Marianist order Catholic school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. isn't Hannity from that area as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Massapequa-same as Alec Baldwin, I believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. classy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow. Nice kid, isn't he?
Will this be brought out in the rape trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Well, if he got an alibi, do you think there will be a trial?
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 01:45 PM by lizzy
"Thomas said “multiple witnesses and a commercial transaction” indicated one of the charged players wasn’t at the party. And defense attorney Robert Ekstrand, who represents other players, said neither Seligmann nor Finnerty was at the party “at the relevant time.”"


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12366767/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. of course his attorney would say he wasn't there
what do you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And I supposed the receipts are fake too?
And multiple witnesses?
WTF are you kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. What receipts?
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 01:51 PM by Beaverhausen
Again, you are quoting what the defense is saying. Lets wait for the trial, shall we?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yes, lets.
Cause I would really like to know how someone who was not even at the party and has multiple witnesses and commercial transaction to prove it managed to rape this woman.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12366767/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. All that is per the defense attorney
What do you expect him to say? Of course he is going to claim his client was innocent. He wouldn't have a job if he didn't, now would he?

I'm not saying the guy is guilty, but I don't think the DA would indict here without some hard evidence. If it does end up that these guys are innocent that DA is going to get buried with allegations of overzealous prosecution, so its not a decision I think they would make on the fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. You don't think the DA would indict without some hard
evidence? I think you will be in for some major surprise then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
54. Sorry, witnesses are very unreliable.
And a receipt isn't proof he was at the ATM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
67. Witnesses are unreliable? Then WTF would you assume
this woman would even identify the correct men?
Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, the alleged victim got a criminal record herself.
What is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatlingforme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I swear you are on the lacrosse team at Duke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh no, I am not.
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 01:43 PM by lizzy
Does it matter to you that one of the players indicted apparently wasn't even at the party?

Could very well be that guy you have already convicted because he had a criminal record. Or could be the other one-there are only two choices.


"Bill Thomas, a defense attorney representing one of the team captains, said Tuesday that neither Seligmann nor Finnerty had any contact with the woman that night. “We are ... actually shocked,” he said. “We always thought she would pick out someone who at least had a conversation with her or paid her.”

Thomas said “multiple witnesses and a commercial transaction” indicated one of the charged players wasn’t at the party. And defense attorney Robert Ekstrand, who represents other players, said neither Seligmann nor Finnerty was at the party “at the relevant time.”"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12366767/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
64. Are "absolutely innocent" people in the habit of submitting to DNA tests?
Or turning themselves in? Oh, I get it...this guy is a martyr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrownOak Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. Turning himself in...
Well, since there was a warrant issued for his arrest his options were to turn himself in, have the police arrest him and haul him in, or flee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. But why did he let it get to that point?
Either this guy is the dumbest suspect on earth or, once again, the defense is farting in the wind with a new goose chase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. OK so Finnerty is an asshat.
That doesn't prove he raped anybody. The media should shut the fuck up about this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What I would like to know-
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 03:18 PM by lizzy
how did he manage to rape her if he wasn't there (according to his defense he can prove it)? Any ideas?

"Another defense attorney, Bill Thomas, called the indictments "absolutely outrageous."

"The two that they indicted had no contact with this woman whatsoever," he said. "We are shocked, absolutely shocked. We always thought she would pick out someone who at least had a conversation with her."

Sources close to the investigation said Tuesday that the defense will present evidence -- including ATM receipts -- that neither Seligmann, 20, nor Finnerty, 19, were at the team party at the time the alleged rape took place.

A cab driver allegedly carried one of the young men to an ATM, where a security camera captured his picture, the sources said, and the other man was reportedly at a restaurant."
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/04/18/duke.rape/index.html

Cause we all know he must have done it somehow, someway. Even if he was on Planet Pluto at the time.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I'm sure the DA will explain his case in court.
Meanwhile I think that the defense legal team, which appears to be quite well funded, is running a major pr campaign to try this case in the media and prejudice as much of the jury pool as they possible can. This is of course entirely legitimate behavior by the defense team. I just wish the media would ignore them and let this case get heard by 12 men and women in a court room instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. EXACTLY!
This is total PR spin by the defense. It doesn't mean the guy is guilty, but you can't exactly take it at face value either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. AMEN!!!
See, I can agree with you here even if I disagree with you on the women's clinic/protesters thread. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. And I can be impossible everywhere! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Don't hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Fantasy of them being innocent?
Well, first of all, they are presumed innocent at this point.
And second of all, do you have any information that they did anything of the sort they are accused of?
Or the fact that one of them has a record means he is guilty in raping this woman?
If anything, I think it's you and people like you that fantasize about them being guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Nope. I haven't said one way or the other. This fantasy trip is all
yours.

BTW, I watch all those neato tv shows too---going right back to Ironsides...so, like you, I understand the "presumed innocent" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. wow. What a piece of work.
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 04:33 PM by superconnected
So let's get your thought-train straight - the womans story shouldn't be trusted. Her eye witness account means nothing. Her doctors opinions come in question.

But the guys should be believed and presumed innocent no matter what.

Gee, if you gave the woman the same consideration, your stance with the guys would show some integrity.

I'm sure I'm not the only raised eye brow at your one sided justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Count me in with one raised eyebrow, superconnected.
And I do think you hit the nail on the head regarding the integrity of the arguments in question.

Why anyone--let alone someone posting on a progressive board--would leap at first chance to swallow every word from a defense attorney's mouth, yet heap nothing but scorn and malice on a rape victim...well, it's difficult to find a logically consistent argument there. Combined with the utter disregard of the poster in question for the opinion of trained medical personnel in a medical matter, this lopsided focus on smearing the victim doesn't seem to support the poster's professed interest in merely preserving the presumption of innocence in American criminal law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. No Shit
Third thread on this too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. Nancy Grace just had an orgasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. that's just wrong
I did NOT need to get that image in my head. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. well good thing i held back on my post re greta van sustern's ejaculation
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 07:47 PM by madmark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Just please don't mention Rita Cosby in the throes of ecstasy
We cannot, nay, must not go there.

Although I'm curious....does a Rita Cosby orgasm sound more like an outboard motor or a horse that's just been branded?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. christ i didnt even think of that one; now even im sick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Yeah, that's sort of the point
I bet she hits notes that send dogs into convulsions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Too funny!
:spray: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouthInAsia Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
68. But that doesnt necessarily make him a rapist.
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 09:03 PM by YouthInAsia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC