Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-U.S. attorney arraigned in 9/11 case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 10:10 PM
Original message
Ex-U.S. attorney arraigned in 9/11 case
April 22, 2006

A former federal prosecutor and a State Department agent were arraigned Friday in Detroit on obstruction of justice charges, accused of misleading a jury in the first terrorism trial to result from the federal probe of the 9/11 attacks.

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino, 45, and Harry Smith III, 49, stood mute to the charges before U.S. Magistrate Judge Donald Scheer in federal court. Scheer entered not guilty pleas on their behalf and freed the men on $25,000 unsecured bonds. He also ordered them to surrender their passports.

The jury convicted two men of terrorism charges in the 2003 trial, but the U.S. Attorney's Office persuaded the trial judge to throw out the convictions the next year, saying Convertino withheld key evidence from the defense. The reversal was an embarrassment for the Bush administration, which had hailed the convictions as a victory in the war on terror.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060422/NEWS05/604220309/1007


Way to go BushCo. No wonder they want secret courts and prisons.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oops. So much for adults being in charge and all.
The constitution is made for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whoa! From the article:
Smith, formerly assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Amman, Jordan, is accused of lying to the jury about the existence of photographs taken of a Jordanian military hospital. Prosecution witnesses, including Smith, testified that the photographs matched an alleged terrorist targeting sketch found in the defendant's flat.

Man, what a fuck up. This is why, when you're the government, you don't break the rules. This is great because it just shows how Bush's administration of lying and law-breaking fucks themselves on a regular basis. This is hideous because whomever they got convicted may have been actual terrorists. I don't know how important that piece of evidence was.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Remember their names for they WILL be issued pardoned by Bush.
Richard Convertino
Harry Smith III

They WILL be pardoned by Bush on leaving office, two of possibly thousands.

Disgusting...

PB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is so unusual
It is extremely rare for prosecutors to be disciplined for Brady violations. Also, the Government asked for the case to be overturned based upon the violations. Thirdly, with regard to Smith and the photographs, his testimony shouldn't even have been admissable, as a Sixth Amendment violation. This case is being fixed for some other reason. Someone is probably being extorted, coerced or blackmailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC