Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Not unreasonable for city workers to surf Web

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:34 AM
Original message
Judge: Not unreasonable for city workers to surf Web
April 23, 2006

NEW YORK (AP) _ Saying surfing the web is equivalent to reading a newspaper or talking on the phone, an administrative law judge has suggested that only a reprimand is appropriate as punishment for a city worker accused of failing to heed warnings to stay off the Internet.

Administrative Law Judge John Spooner reached his decision in the case of Toquir Choudhri, a 14-year veteran of the Department of Education who had been accused of ignoring supervisors who told him to stop browsing the Internet at work.

The ruling came after Mayor Michael Bloomberg fired a worker in the city's legislative office in Albany earlier this year after he saw the man playing a game of solitaire on his computer.

In his decision, Spooner wrote: "It should be observed that the Internet has become the modern equivalent of a telephone or a daily newspaper, providing a combination of communication and information that most employees use as frequently in their personal lives as for their work."

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--internetsurfingru0423apr23,0,5454675.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. some sanity is injected into this discussion by the judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Definitely
But I wouldn't accept someone using the phone 5 hours a day on company time either. Unless that's the job. Sanity is only part 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds about right to me.
If we had thought any other way we still would not have the funnies or crosswords in the papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why?
Unless access to the internet is needed for their job why give them access in the first place? If they are not general research people limit what sites they can browse. You should be able to send e-mail without a browser. Same with the games why not take them off the computer then you don't have to worry about people playing solitaire on 'company' time. Management would rather threaten the worker than eliminate the problem. Either modify the system to get rid of the problem or judge the worker by the amount of work they get done. If the internet/games are impacting the amount of work completed or deadlines met that is a problem, on the other hand if you have a worker that meets their deadlines and does good deal of work why harass them for spending a little time on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. because it's the workplace standard
He [the Judge] added: "For this reason, city agencies
permit workers to use a telephone for personal calls, so long
as this does not interfere with their overall work
performance. Many agencies apply the same standard to the use
of the Internet for personal purposes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danieljay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. they wont eliminate the problem because they are usually as guilty
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 10:08 AM by Danieljay
as the workers they are referring to. I recently made some personal copies on the copy maching at work, it made extra and left them sitting in the tray. I was called in to the office and handed a copy of the handbook and told I needed to pay 10 cents a piece for the copies.

So, I go to accounting, write an IOU, pay them, they write a receipt, give me a dime in change. So now we just spent about $50 minimum in productivity for the cost of a few copies. I asked all three in accounting and none of them had received a penny from anyone before regarding personal copies, including the "director" I report to. I happen to have witnessed several so called directors and managers, including mine, making personal copies of anything from stupid silly emails to home mortgage transactions and evidently not one of them has paid for personal copies, according to accounting.

Anyway, my point I guess is that most everyone is guilty of using the internet on company time. That being said, IF its affecting the employees actual performance and he/she is not reaching their goals or expectations, I agree that they should be reprimanded or worst case, replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Because most workplace LANs and WANS
are now built on the Net. The two are no longer separate.

I read the news online, I do my crosswords at lunch, all of it online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. What does this have to do with their job?
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 08:17 AM by exlrrp
As a former employer, I wonder what this person's job is and how or why they use the internet in it.
is it research? Paper writing? what? If this persons job has nothing to do with the internet then let them surf on thier own time, just like I would expect them to read a newspaper on their own time, unless their job was clipping articles.
I'd also like to know how what sites he was visiting on the taxpayers dime and hwo much time he was spending on them. If they were porno or game sites he should be fired and I mean right now.The taxpayers shouldn't have to support someones addictions when they should be working
The offense here is disobeying orders from supervisors, who obviously were concerned and had warned this person before. His lawyer got him off being fired because he works for a public municipality--out in the private sector he would have been pounding the pavement.
Ok so they reprimand him this time. What should do they do the next time they bust him spending too much time on the net on the taxpayers dime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. A reading of the linked article clearly states the following:
"a search of Choudhri's computer files revealed he had visited several news and travel sites."

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--internetsurfingru0423apr23,0,5454675.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. wow you're really hardcore

...maybe they're doing it on their break time. There are all kinds of jobs that require knowledge of current events. Maybe by being aware of what's going on they will be able to come up with more creative solutions to problems in the workplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I have mixed feeling about this
Especially since I've had to spend $1000's cleaning up people's computers after they've infected them with viruses.

I don't mind people looking at stuff but don't do your business or download anything on my computers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. on "your computers"?

So you own the computers? or do you just work on them. You hit a nerve by using that phrase cause I've had so many problems with systems people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm a small business owner
with 25 - 30 employees.

Yes, I own their computers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. self delete
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 07:04 PM by brazenlyliberal
self delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC