Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S.: States Negligent in Use of Lethal Injections (New HRW report)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:05 AM
Original message
U.S.: States Negligent in Use of Lethal Injections (New HRW report)
(New York, April 24, 2006) – Incompetence, negligence, and irresponsibility by U.S. states put condemned prisoners at needless risk of excruciating pain during lethal injection executions, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Lethal injections are used in 37 of the 38 death penalty states in the United States and by the federal government. Every execution in 2005 was by lethal injection.

The 65-page report, http://hrw.org/reports/2006/us0406/]">“So Long as They Die: Lethal Injections in the United States,” reveals the slipshod history of executions by lethal injection, using a protocol created three decades ago with no scientific research, nor modern adaptation, and still unchanged today. As the prisoner lies strapped to a gurney, a series of three drugs is injected into his vein by executioners hidden behind a wall. A massive dose of sodium thiopental, an anesthetic, is injected first, followed by pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes voluntary muscles, but leaves the prisoner fully conscious and able to experience pain. A third drug, potassium chloride, quickly causes cardiac arrest, but the drug is so painful that veterinarian guidelines prohibit its use unless a veterinarian first ensures that the pet to be put down is deeply unconscious. No such precaution is taken for prisoners being executed.

“The U.S. takes more care killing dogs than people,” said Jamie Fellner, U.S. program director at Human Rights Watch and co-author of the report. “Just because a prisoner may have killed without care or conscience does not mean that the state should follow suit.”

Human Rights Watch opposes capital punishment in all circumstances and calls for its abolition. But until the 38 death penalty states and the federal government abolish capital punishment, international human rights law requires them to ensure they have developed a method of execution that will reduce, to the greatest extent possible, the condemned prisoner’s risk of mental or physical pain and suffering.

more http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/04/24/usdom13241.htm


:grr: Fallibility of the Criminal Justice System, Racial Bias, Economic Bias, Geographic Bias, Mental Illness and the Death Penalty, International Human Rights Norms...

http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/02/02/usdom12596.htm





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I speak with all due respect in saying this...
It is not my preference that the states improve their procedures by having a great deal more practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don´t understand your comment?
Edited on Mon Apr-24-06 04:56 AM by Stockholm
I can´t see a reference to "learning by doing" anywhere in the report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The report says they don't support more executions to get it right.
Doesn't mean I can't make a comment simply to highlight the issue.

If it came off wrong, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for posting this article
since these executions are being carried out in our name -- we need to educate ourselves on this tabu topic.

I had no idea that the three drug combination was first used 30 years ago --

So this is "faith based" execution?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC