Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shiite Militias Move Into Oil-Rich Kirkuk, Even as Kurds Dig In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 09:55 PM
Original message
Shiite Militias Move Into Oil-Rich Kirkuk, Even as Kurds Dig In
Hundreds of Shiite Muslim militiamen have deployed in recent weeks to this restive city -- widely considered the most likely flash point for an Iraqi civil war -- vowing to fight any attempt to shift control over Kirkuk to the Kurdish-governed north, according to U.S. commanders and diplomats, local police and politicians.

The Mahdi Army, led by firebrand cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, has sent at least two companies, each with about 120 fighters, according to Thomas Wise, political counselor for the U.S. Embassy's Kirkuk regional office, which has been tracking militia activity.

In a meeting here last week, Sadr's representative in the city, Abdul Karim Khalifa, told U.S. officials that more armed loyalists were on the way and that as many as 7,000 to 10,000 Shiite residents were prepared to fight alongside the Mahdi Army if called upon. Legions more Shiite militiamen would push north from Baghdad's Sadr City slum, he said, according to Wise.

"His message was essentially that any idea of Kirkuk going to the Kurds will mean a fight," Wise said. "He said that their policy here was different from in other places, that they are not going to attack coalition forces because their only enemy here is the Kurds."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/24/AR2006042401560.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Golly, Unca Dick! This sounds like...
civil war! Imagine that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I said before, Shias will never allow the Kurds to secede
There is never going to be an independent Kurdistan

Shia, Suni, and Turkmen in Iraq will never allow it to happen, even if they have to use force. Turkey won't allow it. Iran won't allow it. Syria won't allow it. The US will not allow it either, and neither will Russia and China who have separatist problems of their own.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2242950&mesg_id=2242975
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's not enough Shiites to do a damned thing to stop it though
Not like the Iraqi Army would intervene. (Ha! Ha!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sadr has four million followers in Sadr City
It could get horrifically bloodly if he wanted it to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. All of Sadr City's two million mainly Shi'a Muslims.ready to go to war?
I kind of doubt that.

The 7,000 he is saying he might move to Kirkuk is also half of his total force under command.

Not that your "horrifically bloodly" is wrong - I agree it would be.

But Sadr's power is quite a bit less than 4 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. As long as it's not a civil war yet.
:eyes:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh shit.
I've been fearing this. I hope nothing comes of this.

I want to see bush fail, but not at the cost of more death and destruction.

Not only should we impeach bush and remove his whole administration, those responsible for the war should be put on trial for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Geez, sounds like the boys aren't playing very nice over there. Think
that maybe there will be some rough stuff over who gets those Kirkuk oil fields?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting choice of word - restive. It fits, but seems such an odd term
to use in a newspaper article. :shrug:

Certainly looks like our troops are going to get caught up in the middle. Will they be forced to choose sides? This part here looks like a shrewd move on Sadr's part - basically calling a cease fire on coalition forces...assuming coalition forces don't shoot first.

In a meeting here last week, Sadr's representative in the city, Abdul Karim Khalifa, told U.S. officials that more armed loyalists were on the way and that as many as 7,000 to 10,000 Shiite residents were prepared to fight alongside the Mahdi Army if called upon. Legions more Shiite militiamen would push north from Baghdad's Sadr City slum, he said, according to Wise.

"His message was essentially that any idea of Kirkuk going to the Kurds will mean a fight," Wise said. "He said that their policy here was different from in other places, that they are not going to attack coalition forces because their only enemy here is the Kurds."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. why shouldn't the kurds secede
iraq is a basket case of religious insanity. the kurds are less sectarian than the shiaas and sunnis.
i can't say i blame the kurds, lots of bad memories from when saddam was in power.it seems as if the world is against it....i say, let them be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because they would be butchered
The Sunnis and Shia would send thousands and thousands of men to fight them. More importantly Turkey and Iran would be more then happy to gobble up good chunks of Northern Iraq and mark my words they would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. they seen the most rational
why does might always win (um, sometimes). it's too bad, the kurds would probably be able to make a good start at a democratic government. maybe someone (not the west) should fund the rebels (india, russia, or china?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Wow, you don't know much about the place at all...
Not knocking you. But you seriously need to read up on all the different factions and on how they only barely commuted a 30 year hard prison time sentence for a reporter whose crime was writing things that the "president of Kurdistan" didn't like. And the Israelis have a lot of friends there. The US would be horrified if India, Russia or China supported the Kurds. It'd align the Kurds against the US, which would be a disaster for US interests there.

Bottom line is, all anyone has to do is decide Iraq doesn't really exist, it's just a figment of our imagination. After that, Kurdistan's existence is a natural step. No-longer-Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites can fight over what the Kurds can't be bothered to take. Yeah, that's better. Real positive development there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. i wasn't writing from a "realpolitik" POV
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 04:51 PM by adriennui
if all 3 factions stand together they all go down. a kurdistan would have the best chance of acheiving some sort of free(ish) society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Remember the Kurdish militia is just waiting for orders to split off and
go off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kirkuk is Kurdish. Tell Al Sadr to stick it up his ass
Kirkuk and Erbil are in the Kurdish dominated zone. Those cities are Kurdish. Al Sadr and his Mahdi army can go to hell. The Peshmerga will protect Kirkuk from anyone trying to take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Thank you for illustrating what a powder keg this all is.
But while your first phrase is true, your third phrase is pure opinion, and your second is a stretch. That city (Kirkuk) is not Kurdish. YET. The Peshmerga will have to protect it from anyone ELSE trying to take it, while taking it for themselves.

Hence why it's a powder keg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sadr and his thugs can go to hell.
Thats Kurdish land, the Arabs have no right to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Kurds sadly will be sold down the river.
They will dream of how good life was compare to now.

Sold down the river
Sold down the river.

Prove me wrong bush

You selling them down the river
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. And so it starts..
The Kurds actually thought they could continue to maintain their little domain. The No-fly zone gave them peace and quiet, and autonomy. Those days are OVER.. The shi'ites are the majority, and they will run roughshod over the Kurds. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The Kurds are much too tough to be run over quickly.
But hey, the longer a conflict goes on, the less good their position looks.

Hence why I keep saying it's a powder keg. Regardless of if one's personal sympathies lie with the Kurds or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I believe that too
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 09:51 AM by Canuckistanian
The Kurds have been repressed for a long time.

Now, they have relative autonomy, newfound wealth, political power in the Iraqi government and, most importantly, a new national pride.

Any enemy that tries to take them on is going to get a vicious fight.

The problem is, Turkey would try to insinuate itself right into the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's a great big rock rolling downhill
one that we kicked the lockstone out from underneath. We have set events into motion with this excursion into madness that we're not going to be able to stop.
I said in 02 that chucklenutz* was whacking a Hornet's nest, now the swarm is out, and I haven't any confidence in anyone's ability to stop things before they decend further into insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here's an ethnoreligious map of Iraq for some perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Armed conflict over territory will split Iraq into three sections.
“The Kurds, the majority of which are Sunni, make up 20% of the Iraq population and are also persecuted.”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/ethnic.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC