Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Green mini-car to beat congestion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:51 AM
Original message
Green mini-car to beat congestion
24 April 2006





A tiny, three-wheeled car that could help solve city congestion has been demonstrated at the University of Bath.

The prototype Clever (Compact Low Emission Vehicle for Urban Transport) car is one metre wide and less polluting than normal vehicles.

It has a top speed of 100 km/h (60mph) and uses a novel tilting chassis to make it safe and manoeuvrable.

The traffic-busting two-seater is the result of a 40-month project by researchers in nine European countries.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4930794.stm


It's amazing what we could do if we put our minds to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. True, BUT the majority of us will still have to rely
on our older used cars for a while longer. The "new" ones and "green" ones sound great, but they also come with car payments for many years, and lots of us don't DO car payments:)

I don't know how people can afford new cars these days..:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. And a lot of the new cars are downright ugly and not
safe for the tons of interstate driving (with HUGE trucks) some of us have to deal with.

This particular car isn't as ugly - looks more like a dune buggy - but most of the hybrids are kind of, well, I don't find them particularly attractive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's a pic of the finished model


It's actually sort of cute but I've always liked ugly cars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It depends on the bumper stickers...

(Not my real license plate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Your still not safe
If you tangle with a 60 ton semi. It won't matter if you are driving a tricycle or a hummer.

And maybe that is the answer. Since to maximize efficiency we need to make cars smaller and trucks bigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Lots of us can't even get loans for cheap used cars!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. now that's a car
i could really get into. cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah? Go to India, they have millions of 'em. Of course they
are the older virsion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LosinIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, but do they come with snow tires?
I live in the Lake Effect region of Central NY and we get hammered off and on through out the winter. I commute 40 miles each way to work so I don't think ito woul really be practical for me, better stick with the Mazda Protege 5, ZoomZoomZoom, it gets around 36mpg on the highway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'll take an enclosed two-wheeler like this -->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. man, that looks like fun!
so if you can get your hands on one, is it legal to ride it on the highway? i'm ready :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. It says max speed is 60mph, so highway driving is out.
Which would leave it for errands in the city, but there is no space to put anything, including a passenger.

Seems like it will be a toy for people who can afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boise1 Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. 150 mph on the above Ecomobile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Ecomobile is a different one then?
I still would never drive something like that on the highway. If you crash, you die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. I want one were can i get it
It would be great for my 3 mile commute, just as long as the dumb suv driving soccer moms, who cant see over the steering wheal don't run me over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Its not only the Soccer Moms but everyone
that is on a cell phone. I drive fro a living and I'm just so sick of the people that have to have their freaking phone glued to their ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. For a 3 mile commute, why don't you ride a bicycle?
That's only a 15-20 minute bike ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Looks Like A Straight-up Ripoff Of The Carver.
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 09:06 AM by jayfish
Carver Video

They should have just bought out the Carver guys instead of wasting 40-months of researchers time.


Jay

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Thanks for the link. Now I want one.
I also want a Smart Car. But for now I got a Vibe. Which is ugly but I like ugly cars, because I think they are so freaking cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Great video....
...:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kinda hard to take 3 kids grocery shopping in that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Not every solution will work for everyone
but naysaying every good idea will get us nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lagavulin Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. What does naysaying have to do with it?
It's a simple fact: if it can't serve our lifestyle then it won't market. If you can't load 2 or 3 kids in the back, why will you buy this over a fuel-economy minivan?

I mean I'm not arguing the effort, but I would question the theory. Our culture has spent 70-odd years deciding that the mid-sized car is the ideal form of mainstream vehicle. How many dozens of "better" designed cars have been built? I've run across countless article and sites about more efficient engines, bodies, power-generators, etc. over the years and you know what? Cars look pretty much the same today as they did when I was a kid. Pretty much the same as the old-timey cars I've seen in pictures and museums. New technology and designs won't sell unless they have the look of at least a compact car and can drive 80mph without shaking....because that's the vehicle we've constructed our culture and the physical infrastructure of our society around (at least here in America).

Yes, if America becomes a bankrupt, third-world nation then we will probably see millions of people driving tuk-tuks...and that will probably happen soon, but until it does people will continue taking on debt to buy something that they can use to haul their oversized bags and cardboard boxes from Target and Wal-mart back to their homes Suburbadale 20 miles away (while stopping to grab the dry-cleaning and a few value meals for the 2.1 kids in the back seat). That's the chief reason SUV's are so popular--you can carry lots of stuff in them (plus that they're perceived as being safer and more dominant).

Heck, even when people live in an area where most of their needs (and wants) are within walking distance, they still want a car they can throw a few suitcases in to "get away" for the weekend, to visit the family out of town, or just to lug the pool-toys to the beach or waterpark or pick up those 18 new shrubs for their back-porch permaculture garden or whatever.

The problem is not that we need more "efficient" or better cars! As long as we are a confirmed consumer culture we will need big cars (or at least access to one on short-notice). Until we learn--or are forced--to deconsume our lives, we're married to Motor City, now matter what country Motor City is in. Until we change our culture, we won't change our cars....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. And is there room for groceries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Maybe you can put an apple in the glove compartment.
Oh, wait. I don't see a glove compartment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. uh
its aim is to solve <i>city</i> congestion, not to cart kids around in the suburbs.

i live in the city. and i don't take my car grocery shopping EVER. cause where i live in the city there are 3 grocery stores less than 3 blocks away from my place and a bunch more that deliver.

its like you're complaining that a hammer is no good cause it can't drive screws.

personally, i don't see what makes this thing so much better than a scooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. It goes 60 mph
and is safer then a scooter. Plus it's got some 'new' suspension system that might have other applications.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chopper Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. my scooter goes 60mph
though i wouldn't say its nearly as safe as that thing at those speeds.

however, i don't do 60 in the city, and the 2-wheeled scooter is far more manouverable and easier to park than that glorified go-kart would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. They really need to come out with
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 10:15 AM by FlaGranny
several different vehicles: a one seater, a two seater, and a four seater. An enclosed wagon would be useful for when you need to get things. It could be detached when not used. It would be a lot more practical to do that.

Edit: The truth is, though, that I wouldn't feel very safe in a vehicle that tiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. you build up a keener sense of your surroundings. Your
reflexes sharpen, you become a more defensive driver, just like a cyclist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I tried bike riding on busy
streets once. I was terrified the entire time, so I rode on the sidewalk - also dangerous, but felt safer. The trouble with bikes and vehicles like that is that many times, they are not even seen. The same with motorcycles. My uncle was nearly killed, spent months in the hospital, and never recovered completely, from a motorcycle accident, where the driver of a car pulled out into his path without seeing him. Then, when I was working in a hospital, we had a couple come in to the ER both DOA. They had been innocently sitting at a red light one evening and were struck from behind by someone who didn't see them. In both those cases, defensive driving could not have helped. When I'm in traffic, I want to be seen. Even in a car, it's bad out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. It take a while to learn street smarts. I rode a lot in Detroit.
It wasn't just the cars that could get you, the pedestrians were a hazard. Some were just clueless, so wanted your bike to sell for a fix.

Now the greatest threat is the cell phone. A week or so ago a woman got hit by a train. She was so busy yakking on the phone that she didn't notice the warning lights and the approaching train.
Out of the gene pool in a flash. Not sure if it is safe to ride anymore. the cell ups the chance of getting hit. When on the phone the driver become "blind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. You're safer on a bicycle than in a car
People feel safer in a car because they are enclosed but the safety is really an illusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. Kinda Kewl
I like the little Smart car as well...

But while it maybe a concern that a smaller car like this might not fair vey well with larger cars (presuming the large car hasn't been supplanting by all these small cars over time), I am surprised nobody has pointed out that your are ALSO a pedestrian,and so, you are much more likely to survive being hit by one of these, I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. Tiny little cars are common in Japan
They're fully encased in metal, but they're smaller than anything I've seen in the States. They're practical in Japan, where the streets can be so narrow that the sides of a bus practically scrape the buildings on either side.

People drive scooters and bicycles a lot more, too.

Personally, I wouldn't drive a scooter or an eensy-teensy car on a four-lane+ highway, but they'd be great for ordinary city street commuting. I see bicycle commuters going up Hennepin Avenue toward downtown Minneapolis, and I think, "Why do that, when there are practically traffic-free residential streets running parallel to Hennepin almost all the way downtown?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC