Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Army weapons supply local insurgents (!!!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:47 PM
Original message
Iraq Army weapons supply local insurgents (!!!)
Tue. April 25, 2006

UPI Intelligence Watch
by John C.K. Daly
Apr 25, 2006

WASHINGTON, April 25, 2006 (UPI)
-- Eight Iraqi soldiers, mostly privates, have turned in their company commander, a major, and a captain who were supplying army weapons to local insurgents.

U.S. and Iraqi intelligence officers had believed for some time that munitions from the Badush ordnance depot in al Kisik, near Tal Afar, were being purloined and supplied to guerrillas, who used them to manufacture improvised explosive devices.

The Badush munitions depot was established during the reign of deposed Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
Stars and Stripes reported on April 24 that although Iraqi army officers repeatedly assured their U.S. counterparts that the magazine had been secured, U.S. intelligence noted that local guerrillas seemed to have a limitless supply of artillery shells and other military ordnance. The issue strained local relations between Iraqi officers and U.S. military commanders in northwestern Iraq.

<snip>

On March 6 the soldiers, members an intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance company, were using night-vision equipment to monitor the site when they observed two civilian cars, which they decided to investigate. Speaking on condition of anonymity, one of the men said, "We went down to question them and they confessed. They told us, 'we have bombs in our car. Don't worry though, we are only going to use them on Americans.'"

<snip>

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/security/article_21216015.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. In the early days of Vietnam
local cadre in the Delta advised Hanoi to stop sending snmall arms because they were getting those from the ARVN, and Communist bloc weapons caused logistical problems. They were more streamlined logistically with weapons stolen from Uncle Sam! Here we go again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hear a ghostly 'I told you so',
from John Paul Vann and David Hackworth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Americans killed by their own weapons...
It's a little hard to take, on top of all the other bad news we've had.

I'm not wondering why this isn't a front page story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What, you expect the media to report on only the bad news?
Get with it!!


:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET!! Saddam knew what the USA was up to
.
.
.

I doubt that Saddam is surprised at the invasion and his capture.

So he armed his nation as best he could - decentralized stores of weapons, and a confidence that the USA's arrogance would incite his people to ward off the invaders

So far, despite the USA's billions of dollars in weaponry, and thousands of lives of Americans lost on Iraqi soil

Saddam is proving to be a better military mastermind than the fool in the Whitehouse

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. BTW, I thought Tal Afar area was all wine and roses?
I mean, that massive air assault and subsequent photo ops and rhetoric convinced me!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, it was pacified with air strikes and Kurdish Peshmerga
Now they're happy again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. A resistance group infiltrates the occupying regime and uses
the occupying regime's weapons against them.

That's pretty logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hey! Wait! Check out the LAST TWO paragraphs in that article!
For the first time along the Afghan-Pakistani border Afghan, Pakistani and U.S. troops will conduct a joint military exercise, Operation Inspired Gambit.

Geo News reported on April 24 that U.S. military spokesman Col. Laurent Fox said during a press conference in the Afghan capital Kabul that the joint operation would be an "air assault exercise."


Umm...shouldn't that have been done back in, oh, Oct./Nov. 2001?!?!?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LexMan81 Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. ok so what we should do?
s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. LEAVE!
post haste. This was a totally predicatable event. It is FUBAR! Time to bring them home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. or at very least
have coalition (aka American) forces guarding the Iraqi munitions depots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. they were emptied
about three years ago. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I should have said
or at very least have coalition (aka American) forces guarding the Iraqi Army (aka American) munitions depots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran1212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. They certainly won't fight for foreigners and occupiers
I'll bet many Iraqi army members join just to be double agents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC