Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Loss of Competition Is Seen in Health Insurance Industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 12:32 AM
Original message
NYT: Loss of Competition Is Seen in Health Insurance Industry
Loss of Competition Is Seen in Health Insurance Industry
By ROBERT PEAR
Published: April 30, 2006

WASHINGTON, April 29 — Federal investigators have found that a handful of companies account for a growing share of the health insurance policies sold to small businesses in most states, leaving consumers with fewer options and higher costs.

The Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, said that the largest insurer had 43 percent of the market for small group coverage in a typical state, up from 33 percent in 2002. In nine states, the largest carrier — a Blue Cross and Blue Shield company — has more than 50 percent.

Small businesses and doctors also report a steep decline in competition in health insurance markets, a problem Congress is trying to address.

Within two weeks, the Senate plans to take up legislation that would make it easier for small businesses to band together and buy health insurance through trade associations and chambers of commerce. The main purpose of the bill, strongly supported by President Bush, is to make coverage more affordable.

In the face of soaring health costs, small businesses have struggled to find affordable insurance for their employees. The legislation would set uniform federal standards for insurance products that have long been regulated by the states. The standards would supersede state laws requiring coverage of specific services like cancer screenings in the individual and group markets....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/30/us/30insure.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is the dangerous S 1955 bill.



...Within two weeks, the Senate plans to take up legislation that would make it easier for small businesses to band together and buy health insurance through trade associations and chambers of commerce. The main purpose of the bill, strongly supported by President Bush, is to make coverage more affordable.

In the face of soaring health costs, small businesses have struggled to find affordable insurance for their employees. The legislation would set uniform federal standards for insurance products that have long been regulated by the states. The standards would supersede state laws requiring coverage of specific services like cancer screenings in the individual and group markets....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. The reality is GAO is right on... Its a Health Monopoly and rates
just go up and up... and the consumer gets less and less...

Universal Health for Everybody!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And rates will do NO different with this bill, No limits on out of pocket
Edited on Sun Apr-30-06 11:44 AM by caligirl
spending before the policy kicks in and no limits to premium charges. The groups selling the plans will charge any price they want and the state can't stop them. And the federal governemen won't be able to enforce any federal standards developed by a board this bill calls for. And of course the new insurance sellars will have a seat at that board, the consumer won't. Allows for additional cjarges for age, gender etc.

The bill is marketed as a way to give small business more choices and buying power. Instead it gives insurance companies even more control over price and treatment options.

S1955, claims vs. reality.
http://www.nationalpartnership.org/portals/p3/library/TheUninsured/S1955ClaimsvReality.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. U.S. Senate is about to gut guaranteed health insurance coverage:
I posted this on the Activist Forum


U.S. Senate is about to gut guaranteed health insurance coverage for regul Updated at 6:21 PM



Send a free fax to your Senators NOW: (other manadatory coverage will be dropped also):
The U.S. Senate is about to gut guaranteed health insurance coverage for regular mammograms.

Tell the Senate to vote NO on S.1955.

Protect coverage for mammograms.
Read More...
Go to:
http://www.acscan.org/site/pp.asp?c=cnJHJIPuB&b=1555475

OR CALL your Senators:

Call Your U.S. Senator

Call 1-888-NOW-I-CAN
between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. EST
to be connected to the office of your U.S. Senator.

When the receptionist answers the phone, simply tell him/her the following:
"Please tell Senator ________ that I am a state resident and that I want him/her to oppose Senate Bill 1955 and any other bill that would not protect cancer screenings."

It's as easy as that. Please be prepared to give the operator in the office your name and address if they ask.

A few additional talking points are provided below. Click here to learn even more about the issue and this legislation.

* Right now, there is legislation before the U.S. Senate that, if passed, would allow insurance companies to ignore state laws on insurance coverage. This legislation, Senate Bill 1955, would remove any guarantee of insurance coverage for vital cancer screenings, prevention, and treatments that are currently provided for in more than 130 state laws across the country.
* This bill would eliminate all of the American Cancer Society’s work in your state to guarantee insurance coverage for mammograms, colon cancer screenings, clinical trial participation, and other cancer screenings and treatments.


What other cancer screenings are at risk?

Insurance coverage for the following cancer screenings and treatments could be eliminated:

- Mammograms - Colonoscopy
- Pap smear - Clinical trials
- Off-label drug use - Prostate cancer screenings
- And more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick for the afternoon crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC