GOP Senator Criticizes Appeals Court Nominee
By Charles Lane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 12, 2006; Page A05
A key Senate Republican clashed yesterday with President Bush's pick for a federal appeals court, taking aim at the nominee's past support for harsh interrogation methods at the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
At a Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) said that Pentagon General Counsel William J. Haynes II had pushed for the tactics over the objections of top uniformed military lawyers who considered the policy process a "sham."
The result, Graham told reporters after the hearing, was "legal confusion" that contributed to the scandal at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison -- and the attendant courts-martial and other career damage for those held responsible....
***
With Democrats united against Haynes, Graham's position is crucial because without his support Haynes could have a hard time getting out of the Judiciary Committee, which has 10 Republicans and nine Democrats. Graham is also one of the Senate "Gang of 14" that has agreed to oppose filibusters of judicial nominees except in "extraordinary circumstances."...
***
Haynes addressed the development of a memo that suggested it would be legal to subject some al-Qaeda prisoners to "cruel, inhumane or degrading" treatment. Responding to charges that he essentially collaborated with Justice Department lawyers on the memo, then ran roughshod over military lawyers who objected, Haynes acknowledged that there had been "spirited discussions" at the Pentagon but that everyone received a fair hearing....Graham said that the military lawyers "went ballistic" when they saw the "torture memo," believing that it contradicted established military practices and could put soldiers who followed it in legal jeopardy....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/11/AR2006071101026.html