Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Qwest Chief Calls Net Neutrality 'Really Silly'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 10:02 PM
Original message
Qwest Chief Calls Net Neutrality 'Really Silly'
(AP) DENVER Qwest Communications chief Dick Notebaert said Wednesday the issue of ensuring equal, open access to the Internet is "really silly" and could wind up costing consumers more money.

. . .


"Competition is good, makes us better and makes us more creative," Notebaert said. "That's why when they talk about net neutrality, bad idea. Really silly. What we're talking about has no basis in anything. It's a nice move to make the consumer pay for everything."

Some major U.S. telecommunications companies have proposed giving priority treatment to Web users who pay to get through faster. In effect, service would be broken into tiers, with more money guaranteeing quick or better access online.

. . .

Advocates of net neutrality are concerned that telephone companies want to become "gatekeepers of the Internet," said Jim McGann of the It's Our Net Coalition of businesses and consumers. "Companies like Qwest want to change the fundamentals of the Internet, charge more, boost their bottom line," McGann said.

http://cbs4denver.com/business/local_story_243122347.html

Telcos want ownership of the internet and any objection to their grabbing ownership is "Really Silly". Funny thing is that the Telcos don't expect to pay for this new right, they expect just to be handed the internet free of charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Aww, what I call him isn't even printable.
Even with DU's permissive standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. How arrogant, corrupt and brazen
I wish to extend my thanks to all the DINO's who empowered- and continue to empower- assholes like this who steal from us and tell us we should like it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. How appropriate that his name is Dick
And how funny that he thinks consumers should trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's amazing how many of these dicks are called Dick
Richard Bruce "Dick" Cheney
Richard "Dick" Nixon
Richard "Dick" Helms (head of CIA during Nixon)

Imagine a conversation between Nixon and Helms, calling one another by their first name... (see "Nixon" the movie)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, I was shocked to see an TV ad...
...on ESPN. "They want you to pay more -- Say no to net neutrality" stating that it was a silicon valley gimmick that was bad for consumers and it would cost you more!

It was all a pack of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. I've seen those ads - completely misleading. I wonder what the public
makes of them? For instance, the average ESPN viewer. Do they have any idea what the hell the commercials are talking about?

Even for me, a person somewhat enlightened on the issue, I still did a double take.

Ah well, maybe it will send folks to their internet(s) connection and see what all the fuss is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. heehee. transparent as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. yeah, silly internet... it was designed that way
who could've have forseen that a bunch of corporation would want to steal it for themselves? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Pushing the meme of competition again
Competition has it's place in culture and society but it isn't a silver bullet or sacred idea that can solve any problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not "competition" in this case. It's extortion.
This will hurt small ISPs who won't get paid by web site owners. This will hurt web site owners who will have to pay every ISP to get their content shown at a normal speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. What surprises me (maybe it shouldn't, considering their
level of intelligence) is that the fundies don't realize that with tiered service the porno and gambling sites will be able to afford the top (fastest) tier with no problem. While the more "wholesome" (non-corporate) sites will only be able to afford the bottom tier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hmmm, let's find Qwest rates today
And see where they are in two years. Headline in yesterday's Tribune, REALLY:

Phone charges to jump in 2007

....but consumers may have an edge


Now, if you believe that, I got a real nice bridge, lotsa traffic, just begging for a goldmine of a toll...I'll sell it to you cheap, cuz I like your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. I used to work for this prick...
This was the same Dick that was seeing multi-million dollar bonuses while showing employees to the door every Friday afternoon with a box and a security guard. I'm glad I quit that place when they asked me to train my replacement who was calling from India. I never did train the little shit, instead I pulled out my 401K and started working for myself. So long Qwest, you suck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. Has Anything Been Said About What This Could Do to "Backbone" Users?
ie, will smaller ISPs (there are still some) have to pony up to see equal bandwidth allotment for their customers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. LOL...competition
Libertarian corportist types are are always using 'competitive' metaphors as if it was a sport or something. But any sport you can call a sport actually has some 'common agreed to rules' or else it wouldn't be 'competitive' or a sport, by definition.

The corporatist libertarian thinks competition is amassing ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. The obvious question to ask is:
So your company advocates making less money, then? How do your stockholders feel about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. i've worked on qwest's advertising a good bit and i don't see how they
stay in business.

they're barely in business, losing market share each day. and their marketing people are among the worst -- if not THE worst i've seen in 15 years.

but i'm talking about general stupidity in their operations, etc. they're utter morons.

and that's my spirit of service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Everybody's got their something.
Qwest was hailed for not giving in to Bushco's wiretapping bullshit, but now we see their true colors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Qwest Only Resisted Bushco's Wiretapping
because they can't afford any more lawsuits ever since they were one of the companies caught cooking their books a few years ago. Since the Bushies couldn't provide a boilerplate legal reasoning behind their wiretapping schemes, Qwest wisely declined to participate. Believe me, it was not because they were concerned about their customers or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, true altruism is a long-rotted corpse. Isn't it?
Sad to think that the only reason Qwest failed to comply was their own financial situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. One Of The Biggest Lie Ever Told
is that a corporation has either a soul or a conscience. It exists only for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC