Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Chairman Criticizes Dean in Vermont

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:20 PM
Original message
GOP Chairman Criticizes Dean in Vermont
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20031202_1676.html

WASHINGTON Dec. 2 — Republican Party Chairman Ed Gillespie on Tuesday went to Vermont Howard Dean's home state for the first time and criticized the Democratic presidential candidate for his stance on the war, comments about military pay and refusal to open his records.

The Dean campaign called Gillespie's speech to be delivered at a fund-raiser at Essex Junction a "pre-emptive attack," referring to the Bush administration's policy of striking a perceived threat early to avoid problems later.

"The fact that the Bush campaign is flying one of their top political operatives to attack Governor Dean in his hometown shows just how much they don't want to run against Governor Dean and his army of grassroots supporters," said Jay Carson, a spokesman for the former Vermont governor.

...more...

the pic on the link page makes a wonderful sight - Dean looks like he's having a great time :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't care what those thugs say
They're scared of Dean. They're scared in general, but especially of a candidate who can raise millions in small donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah....just yesterday all we heard was how the repugs would
love to run against Dean. Yeah, sure, I believe that! I said a long time ago that the repugs were scared stiff of Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. A candidate who can raise millions
in small donations, and even worse, who's clean. If the draft-dodger, sealed records, abortionist bull is the best they can do, they are well and truly screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. agreed...who gives a flying crap what the GOP thinks of Dean.... I guess
this just confirms how much they are afaid of Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. This disproves all those who have said that Dean being pumped by the RNC.
As does the massive media attack on Dean today on Fox and a little on CNN as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It focuses the attention on Dean and energizes his base.
It keeps attention away from Clark...

I think Dean can win, but I do think it's Dean they want to run against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. it reassures dem voters that Dean is electable
The Dean campaign's reaction is completely predictable, Gillespie just did Dean a favor.

Plus they're obviously holding back. The big guns for the general election are abortion and gay marriage, and whatever else they have on him that we don't know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Code_Name_D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But Clark is still the canadate the GOP can live with.
If we are to take back our contry, he have to discredit the GOP, there agenda, and tactics. Bush and others needs to come under scrutiny under warcrimes, or all of this WILL happen again.

But Clark is not that guy. The man prased half of the PNAC gang during the Lincone dinner address. Do you honistly beleive he would lift a finger to point it at Bush and the GOP? More likly Clark will give them a "gentulemns trial" where Bush gets to walk away with his honor and integrity in tact.

And that means none of his croneis have to sweat about having to me dragged off to trial. They will just become talk show hosts and talk on the think tank cercuite, writing books, and rasing money for the next Gen of neo-cons. Many will bide there time in the lap of luxury and influence, waiting for the next republican shill to be apointed.

Clintion beat Herbert Walker, and yet we are still here. Just beating Bush, will fail just as spectaculery. At best, Clark will only keep the seat warm for the next GOP dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadacanabis Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. dems , republican whats the diff
american polictics are a joke...it may seems from the outside so is canada, after all we have a 'marjuana party' (not in party whoohaa sense) the real goal for the next election should be electoral reform. i read an article recently about ballots in alabama (i think) where there were ballots with one name on them...doh! time for more alternatives and more representation in goverment down there. maybe the disinfranchiesed would actually have someone to vote for. in my next fed election i will be able to vote for a liberal (not democrat equivilant) Progressive Conservative (like the dems) Canadian alliance (kinda like republicans) Bloc Qubecois (sovernist quebecers) marijuana party, communist, libertarian, and many other independents....it gives people opportunity and forces issues in parliament....the real issue is reform!!! (including fundraising for elections (our PM was voted in last time in part to his promises for election fund reform...he was successful and there is strong limits on the amount allowed to be donated blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Hi canadacanabis!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coralrf Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Rubbish...
X-Ray has some serious problems. Rove wants to run against the guy contrary to what this thread initial post states. Rove has publicly stated that he wants to have Dean as Bush's opponent. He knows he can beat him soundly.


Will you Deanies please put something of substance out there about Clark and for God's sake not your unsupported opinion phrased as fact? Let me show you what I mean.

Dean cannot go after Bush's bullshit military history as ‘X-Ray’ has a pretty shitty one too. In Viet Nam the people used to use the phrase “Same Same” for things alike. Lets look at some “same same”

Dean voluntarily took his X-Rays from a private doctor that indicated he had a MINOR problem with spondylosus to a Military Induction physical.. He gave the films to the Doctor and asked them to consider his condition as sufficient for exemption from the Draft and therefore service in Viet Nam. When asked about this Dean said.."took a physical, flunked a physical". The MEPPS stations of the day did not X-Ray you and on physical exam Dean appeared normal. Without those films the guy would have been drafted and served. He went skiing with his condition so I don’t see humping the boonies impossible for him.

I too took a MEPPS physical and was drafted, I served in Viet Nam. I know exactly what "Rich Kid" Dean did, why he did it and there is nothing good to be said of it. His attempt to paint this incident as a simple 4-F ruling is tantamount to lie if not out and outright one. Sure Bush will not be able to beat Dean up on this but Dean will not be able to go after Bush’s AWOL, grounding from flight status and the like as it will open him to similar attack.

I don’t want a candidate handicapped like that. Your conservative Clark who will “frog march Ashcroft out of the JD" and will dump the Patriot act amongst other conservative plans has no such handicaps.

Dean has a severe problem in going after Bush’s secrecy and failure to make records available as he id doing the same scum bag thing and he is dumb enough to make that damn stupid remark about it.

See how it is done? You don’t just call Clark a conservative or a kleptomaniac because you "think so" you provide a few facts to support your claims. Facts..not fact based lies. There is a difference.

Go for it Deanies..your man has no chance. Not after the X-Ray bit. He is every bit the coward that Bush is and outside of his circle will be seen as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kutastha Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Essex Junction
Three miles from me. I should stop by and count the Repubs. Shouldn't take long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. This will only strengthen Dean. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just how much....
of Bush's Gubenatorial record is 'confidential'? Funny how they igonre that part of the conversation. Dean said 60% of his record is public...Just ask Kerry, Gephardt, Clark...etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coralrf Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Dean asked for his records to be hidden.
Let me say that again..DEAN REQUESTED THEY BE HIDDEN and then like a fool said it was to 'avoid political problems'.

Clark has a military record and one of a 4 star General. HE HAS ASKED THAT ALL HIS RECORDS BE RELEASED but unlike Dean who controls his records Clark does not. The Army will not release records that contain matters of strategy or procedure or State Policy. They will and have released all records about Clark the Man. We don’t have those records on Dean.

X-Ray can hardly be compared to Clark. Sure the Deanies will spew their nonsense but as of late it is ringing very hollow. Dean is the "Front Runner" the media say and I agree..he ran from the Viet Nam front to the slopes. Go Skiing X-Ray we need a victory in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Dean will release HIS records when Herr Chimpster makes HIS records...
...public. Do you see anything wrong with that tactic? And just who HECK are you to tell anyone they can't win in 2004? I like Clark quite a bit, but he started late and he's got a lot of ground to make up to catch up with people like Dean that have been running for quite a while.

Here's my personal story about the 1969 draft. My number was 46, and I was finishing my first year in college. One night I told my Dad I didn't like college all that much and I was going to enlist in the Navy. I actually told Dad that I wanted to volunteer for one of those riverine patrol units because I wanted to see some action. I was incredibly naive, without a clue whatsoever. Dad reminded me that he had fought in WWII, and he didn't see any sense in me going to Vietnam. "Different war, no clear-cut objectives, and no exit strategy", he said. At that time he was a teacher and football coach, and he had coached some kids that hadn't come back. The conversation went on for several hours until he convinced me to stay one more year in school to see if I still disliked it. Well, it turned out I liked college quite a bit.

But in 1972 I was in a pretty bad car accident that got me reclassified 4F by my local draft board. I did exactly what Dean did...I took my x-rays to the draft board AS REQUESTED. The military doctor made the decision to reclassify me to 4F, just as the doctor reclassified Dean. The only difference between me and Dean is that I stayed another four years in college while he went skiing for 10 months. If he enjoyed the skiing as much as I enjoyed college, we're even. Are you going to make some ignorant disparaging remark about "draft dodging" to me, too?

I medically rehabilitated myself, earned two degrees, and enlisted in the Navy in 1976. I was a full Lieutenant when I got out five years later, having spent my last three years assigned to the Marines at Camp Pendleton. Got anything else to say about "draft dodging"?

And by the way...when did YOU serve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. the army can hide whatever it wants under that cover
It is amazong how the talking points for Clark supporters are identical to what the Republicans spout?

Makes you wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
san antonio Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. About the same amount...
...from what I understand. At one time jr. had his records sent to his daddies presidential library at Texas A&M so they would potentially have 50 years of confidentiality. They've been sent back to Austin and the last I heard the amount that are available for review are in the 40% to 60% range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Hi san antonio!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Hi Debi!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. TYPICAL ROVE TACTIC
LIES TO KEEP THE BUSH TRIP TO IRAQ IN THE NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC