Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medicare Chief Scully Says He's 'Checking Out of Dodge'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:31 AM
Original message
Medicare Chief Scully Says He's 'Checking Out of Dodge'
Could be subtitled: Another Republican Golden Parachute

Thomas A. Scully, the outspoken administrator of the agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid -- the public health insurance programs for more than 70,000 elderly, disabled and poor Americans -- said last night that he has turned in his resignation.

An often colorful figure in a largely buttoned-down administration, Scully is part of a nucleus of senior advisers to President Bush who shaped the administration's policies on the landmark Medicare legislation that Congress passed last week.

<snip>

He said that he has "been talking to a bunch of law firms" and planned to decide on a job in the next few weeks. He said that he had stayed in the administration nearly a year longer than intended and that he was leaving "totally for personal reasons" -- to spend more time with his three young children and find more lucrative work. "I love the job," Scully said. "It's been a great experience."

Last night, Scully said that he informed HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson in May that he wanted to leave, and that Thompson asked him to stay to work on the Medicare bill. At that time, Scully said, he obtained an ethics waiver from the department's general counsel that he said allowed him to begin having general conversations with potential employers.

source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29781-2003Dec2.html

________________________________________________________

Mission Accomplished!

Time to cash in with a private sector job. Bet this guy makes a boatload of money...now that Medicare cash is leaking in to Wall Street. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ILeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. "an ethics waiver"........is that a Bushism?.....eom
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was wondering about that
How do I get an "ethics waiver"? I'd bet it has something to do with that $2,000 per plate thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. In the Bush administration
you can wave (sic) good-bye to any ethics requirements
(on Republicans).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. He'll Now Advise Firms How Not-to-Cover Elderly People
Or, how to cover them at a 300% increase.

If there's such a thing as "karmic cancer", I'm wishing some his way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting.
Put the plan to gut the program in place and get the hell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. See this HORSESHIT at the Defense Dept a LOT!!!!
Top General, Admiral or Civilian Administrator---goes to a big Defense Contractor and cashes in---

Or the Latest SCAM---This same person hired by a CONSULTING FIRM and uses old contacts to obtain the Contract for the Defense Firm for a FEE--

Disgusting----- kind of like a PIG at the PUBLIC TROUGH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Law firms? He knows there are going to be lots of suits over the reform
Going to cash in now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No he is going back to those firms to get his payoff
Prior to assuming responsibility as CMS Administrator, Tom served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federation of American Hospitals, the trade association representing the nation’s 1700 privately-owned and managed community hospitals and health systems from January 1995 to May 2001.

Previously, Scully was a partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Patton Boggs, LLP. His practice focused on regulatory and legislative work in health care. Before joining the law firm, Scully worked at the White House as Deputy Assistant to the President and Counselor to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from 1992-93, and as Associate Director of OMB for Human Resources, Veterans and Labor from 1989-92. In these positions, he oversaw the fiscal policy and regulatory review of the Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, Labor and Veterans Affairs. He also advised President Bush on health care policy, Medicare and Medicaid payment reform.

http://www.hhs.gov/about/bios/cms.html

The only presidential candidate who I have seen address this is John Edwards....the others need to get online and CLOSE the revolving door from industry to administrative posts and back to industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But he got an ethics waiver
so I'm sure it makes everything OK? :puke:

:wtf: is an ethics waiver — a free pass to engage in unethical behavior?!?!?!

But it's OK because they're Repukes. I bet if a Dem tried this, they would be all over it. Where are our spokespeople on this?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Suspect The "Ethics Waiver" is the Gold Card
It probably means it will allow him to now go and work for firms who just directly benefitted from legislation he crafted, got passed helped implement and therefore knows inside out, including all the loopholes and how to best profit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. beautiful summation
of the situation.

thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Time was...
They called this a Get Out of Jail Free Card!

:mad: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I propose we call the BFEE the "Ethics Waiver Administration!"
Ethics waivers drafted our energy policy, got us into perpetual war, and are bankrupting our futures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Our spoksepeople are overwhelmed, flooded, confused...
They are so invested in the Old American Republic they cannot see the forces which are destroying it...and them.

Plus, the absolute lack of a Left-Wing Sub-Media to counterbalance the Bushevik Sub-Media is being shown, given the monstrous infotainment evolution, to have been a grievous error?

Did our spokespeople deign "not to sully themselves" by countering such a fascist move? Or did they just never catch on because they couldn't believe the Busheviks cared not a whit for "The System" and that they would glady destroy it to possess the ashes?

Who knows? At some point, motivations become irrelevant and all that exists is what happened...

However, if there is an afterlife, I expect some very interetsing note-comparison going on between our Democrats and the 1933 German Social Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
Just heard it on CBS radio news. I hope it makes more people aware. Scully was portrayed as cashing in.

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B8D3027F5-9B08-42F4-AB62-075F3ED84E62%7D&siteid=google&dist=google
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. this puts a face on the special interests
something for the dem campaign ads, along with Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. I would assume that an ethics waiver
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 03:31 PM by realpolitik
much like the storehouse of grace through which plenary indulgences erased sin, can only come from a higher ethical power.

Where exactly, would such a thing reside in the American Government of 2003? SCOTUS?, Congress? ... the feakin Boy Scouts of America? Where???

This is a corrupt trough from top to bottom and side to side. The few ethical ones are immersed in the fetid pus that is the Republican party rule.

Nineteenth Century America had Urban Machine politics.
The Twentieth Century saw first Urban vs rural party division within statehouses, then Suburban vs Urban party division.
The Twenty First Century is creating a one party Federal Totalitarian Machine.


Look at PNAC and realize that they are creating a New America, a land of Spartan and Helot. You, and everyone you know is probably a Helot.

Bush Sr. is quite fond of Central American Patronage Peonage systems.
Why does he like them? Because they share common values. So does Junior, though enounciating exactly what those values might be is beyond him.

Stop it with a ballot in 2004, or stop it with bullets in 2006. Call me Cassandra, call me a fruitcake, but that is how I see it, and it has been heading that way since 2000.

PS: On a related note.


It would not take a change in Democratic social policy to win back the rural vote. It would take a demonstrated committment to small farmers, and to dismantling the corporate/agricultural economy. Take it away from CEO's and boards, and return it to family farmers. Re vamp the Dept of Agriculture to promote sustainable farming and ranching at a sustainable market price.

That would be a perminent improvement in the economy and environment. We were paying attention to other things while it got taken over in the 80's, I guess. But it is a real hellhole out there in the stix now. Why else do you think we have a meth problem out in small town America.

These voters are pissed not so much because they think that Urban Democrats are for minorities, as much as they think we are against them; that we sold them out. And we did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC