Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: In New Letter, Clinton Lawyers Demand ABC Yank Film (text)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:09 PM
Original message
TPM: In New Letter, Clinton Lawyers Demand ABC Yank Film (text)
TEXT OF THE LETTER TO ROBERT IGER:

Dear Bob,

Despite press reports that ABC/Disney has made changes in the content and marketing of "The Path to 9/11," we remailn concerned about the false impression that airing the show will leave on the public. Labelng the show as "fiction" does not meet your responsibility to the victims of the September 11th attacks, their families, the hard work of the 9/11 Commission, or to the American people as a whole.

At a moment when we should be debating how to make the nation safer by implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, "The Path to 9/11" calls into question the accuracy of the Commission's report and whether fabricated scenes are, in fact, an accurate portrayal of history. Indeed, the millions spent on the production of this fictional drama would have been better spent informing the public about the Commission's actual findings and the many recommendations that have yet to be acted upon. Unlike this film, that would have been a tremendous service to the public.

Although our request for an advance copy of the film has been repeatedly denied, it is all too clear that our objections to "The Path to 9/11" are valid and corroborated by those familiar with the film and intimately involved in its production.

-- Your corporate partner, Scholastic, has disassociated itself from this proect.

-- 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, who served as co-executive producer on "The Path to 9/11," has stated that he raised concerns about the accuracy of several scenes in the film and that his concerns were not addressed during production.

-- Harvey Keitel, who plays the star role of FBI agent John O'Neill, told reporters yesterday that while the screenplay was presented to him as a fair treatment of historical events, he is upset that several scenes were simply invented for dramatic purposes.

-- Numerous Members of Congress, several 9/11 Commissioners and prominent historians have spoken out against this movie.

-- Indeed, according to press reports, the fact that you are still editing the film two days before it is scheduled to air is an admission that it is irreparably flawed.

As a nation, we need to be focused on preventing another attack, not fictionalizing the last one for television ratings. "The Path to 9/11" not only tarnishes the work of the 9/11 Commission, but also cheapens the fith anniversary of what was a very painful moment in history for all Americans. We expect that you will make the responsible decision to not air this film.

Sincerely,

Bruce R. Lindsey
Chief Executive Officer
William J. Clinton Foundation

Douglas J. Band
Counselor to President Clinton
Office of William Jefferson Clinton

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/sep/09/in_new_letter_clintons_lawyer_demands_abc_yank_film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. But...but....but...it is EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, sez ABC, EXACTLY!!
That is even how those pigfuckers are advertising it in Australia: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2819194&mesg_id=2819194


I do hope ABC ends up meaning Albright, Berger, and Clinton!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice real time document. Keep the pressure up. K & R.
:kick: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Arghh. Does nobody proof these things?
I was a secretary. I hate to see typos in things like this. It just irks me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luna_Chick Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I second that
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 01:52 PM by Luna_Chick
Maybe it's nitpicky to some, but the errors in just the first paragraph made me cringe.

Edited for length.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I suspect this is not the actual letter, but a transcribed copy. . .
typed by Greg Sargent, who posted it on the TPM website.

I suspect as well that a prestigious law firm that represents clients such as President Clinton has very capable secretaries and reasonably up-to-date spellcheckers in their wordprocessing programs.

Finally, when all is said and done, in the matter of this letter I suspect who sent it is far more important than any minor typos that may be present. You and I would need to preafrood very carefully to ensure we're taken seriously. President Clinton is accorded respect in the measure he's valued by the reader, not by any secretarial errors present in his letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I wonder if it's possible the errors were somehow TPM's? Maybe...
had to transfer formats or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can the Democratic Party have a Class Action Lawsuit will all
Democrats signing on to it. It seems to me that this slanders all Liberals and Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clmbohdem Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Albright, Berger, and Clinton will have grounds for a libel suit.
Don't think Dems have anything to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Harvey Keitel said in an interview that he had reservations about...
...the script but did the film anyway. Kinda speaks to the whore-like nature of his sorry existence, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gosh.
Isn't Brazilian JuJutsu a great sport? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. One word: SUE - Libel, slander, defamation of character...
...whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC