Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: One Debate Set in California Governor's Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:47 AM
Original message
LAT: One Debate Set in California Governor's Race
Debate Set in Gov.'s Race
Schwarzenegger will face Phil Angelides once -- on Oct. 7. The challenger's campaign manager criticizes the event's format.
By Michael Finnegan, Times Staff Writer
September 14, 2006


NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME? The event's timing — at 6 p.m. on a Saturday during major league baseball playoffs — could limit the number of viewers. (Reuters/AP)

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and his Democratic challenger, state Treasurer Phil Angelides, reached agreement Wednesday to hold one debate on a Saturday night next month in Sacramento.

The deal to debate Oct. 7, the third anniversary of the California recall election, came after Angelides gave in to an array of conditions that appear to favor the Republican incumbent.

In an effort to make himself better known to voters, Angelides had hoped to debate Schwarzenegger as many as 10 times. But the governor agreed to debate just once, and the event's timing — at 6 p.m. on a Saturday during major league baseball playoffs — could limit the number of viewers.

Also, the moderator, Stan Statham, is a former Republican assemblyman who is now a registered lobbyist for the California Broadcasters Assn., the debate's sponsor. The association has reported lobbying on several bills that have passed the Legislature and are now up for approval or veto by the governor....

***

For the debate, he said, the association's board of directors will review thousands of proposed questions from the public....Cathy Calfo, Angelides' campaign manager, expressed disappointment at the format. In a letter to Steve Schmidt, the manager of Schwarzenegger's reelection campaign, she said she was "mystified" that the governor had refused to have the two candidates stand at lecterns and face "tough questioning by a panel of journalists."...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-debate14sep14,0,1442087.story?coll=la-center-politics-cal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a Rove trap to me
Why would Phil agree to that deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sheer Desperation
The Repubs have an airtime advantage of at least 10-to-1, probably more than that.

Angelides has to take any debate he can get at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Watch them turn it to their advantage

One slip of the tongue by Phil and that will get 50 hours of airtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. 6pm on a saturday night???
this is just wrong! how many people are sitting home in front of their teevee at that time? HE wants as few people as possible to see this, because HE cannot debate!

phil, why did you cave???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sticking a fork in this one
I sometimes think Bob Shrum is still running campaigns behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I stuck a fork in this one the day after the primary
Angelides is one of the worst candidates that I've seen

the voters made a real mistake in not choosing Steve Wesley and thanks to them, we're going to have four more years of Ahnuld

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. you were going to have 4 more years of Arnold regardless....
The days of legitimate, fair elections are long gone. Boycott the election, it is rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'll boycott the election-when hell freezes over
isn't that what they want us to do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC