Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic energy bill would add 530,000 jobs: report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 03:49 PM
Original message
Democratic energy bill would add 530,000 jobs: report

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2440042

Democratic energy bill would add 530,000 jobs: report


Sep 14, 2006 — NEW YORK (Reuters) - A plan by Democratic U.S. lawmakers to boost production of renewable fuels would create 530,000 U.S. jobs, according to a report on Thursday.

The report by the Apollo Alliance, a coalition of environmental and labor groups, and the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, centered on the plan called the Clean EDGE Act, offered in May by 42 Democratic senators.

A bill supported by the senators, including Harry Reid from Nevada and Hillary Clinton from New York, would cut U.S. petroleum use by 6 million barrels per day by 2020, about equal to 40 percent of projected imports, through use of biofuels and renewable energy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apollo Alliance, Statement from Nat'l. Camapaign Director
Statement of Daniel Seligman
Apollo Alliance
National Campaign Director


Sept. 14, 2006

Last Spring, Senators Reid, Clinton, Cantwell, Stabenow and 20 colleagues proposed a big idea: American energy independence based on clean, renewable fuel. But they not only proposed an idea, they provided a detailed roadmap to reach the goal: the Clean Energy Development for a Growing Economy Act.

At the time, we heard the bill would grow the economy and create good jobs for working Americans. So Apollo’s Brian Siu joined with the Dr. Robert Scott of the Economic Policy Institute to put this claim to the test.

And here’s what we found:

At no additional cost to American taxpayers – because this bill pays for itself – the Clean EDGE Act will increase public and private investment in clean, homegrown energy by $49 billion annually.

As a result, the legislation would substantially increase development of wind, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources. It would make our cars, trucks, homes and offices more energy efficient. And it would give motorists more choices by ensuring that filling stations sell ethanol and bio-diesel. That means American consumers’ money will be reinvested at home rather than financing unfriendly regimes abroad to pay for oil.

Our study finds that together these investments would create 530,000 good, family supporting American jobs. Half of these would be high-paying jobs manufacturing wind turbines, solar panels, and efficient vehicles. Another ten percent would be high-paying construction jobs as Americans go to work building wind farms, energy efficient homes and businesses, and new transit systems.


<more>

http://www.apolloalliance.org/seligman_cleanedge.cfm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What a bunch of shit!
I just love politician's selling snake oil!! Ethanol and biofuels cannot be considered renewable and wind and solar will do nothing to drive our cars..

Not to mention that by 2020 the world oil production will be greatly reduced from levels today!! This shit won't work..

And the myth that our economy can grow forever is a sure winner..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why won't wind and solar charged batteries drive cars?
just askin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You don't know what you are talking about, 4dsc. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Ethanol and biofuels can't be considered renewable???
What a bunch of shit that is...

Electric rail systems and electric cars/buses don't exist???

What a bunch of shit that is...

"This shit won't work"

clue - it's working today...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. So what are you proposing?
There is a drawback to every solution to our energy problem but we've got to push ahead with something. Just because ethanol is not especially economical right now doesn't mean it will stay that way forever. What if we took a look at the Wright Brother's plane ans said, 'This is stupid. It only went 120 feet and you can't even put any passengers on it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Check out this broad based labor/business/environmental alliance:
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 05:46 PM by pinto
The Apollo Alliance for Good Jobs and Clean Energy

The Apollo Alliance provides a message of optimism and hope, framed around rejuvenating our nation’s economy by creating the next generation of American industrial jobs and treating clean energy as an economic and security mandate to rebuild America. America needs to hope again, to dream again, to think big, and to be called to the best of our potential by tapping the optimism and can-do spirit that is embedded in our nation’s history.

In 1961, John F. Kennedy challenged the nation to send a man to the moon and return him safely home again within the decade. It was an audacious dare. The technology did not yet exist, but he marshaled the resources of a nation -- focusing public investment, research, science and technology education, worker training, and America’s industrial might on a common purpose. It was leadership toward a common positive goal and it worked. In less than eight years Neil Armstrong placed the first human footprint on the lunar surface, and President Kennedy to this day remains honored for his vision and as a leader of courage.

Now America has an Apollo project for the 21st century. Today the stakes are much, much higher. We face an economy hemorrhaging its highest paying and most productive jobs, cities falling apart with over a trillion dollars in unmet public investment in crumbling schools, transportation, and infrastructure. The middle class is increasingly insecure as career ladders are broken and not replaced in new service sector jobs. And on a global scale we face never before seen environmental disruption, rising social inequity, and the emergence of fundamentalist anger that threatens our very security. We need new leaders of vision, and a new unifying call to action.

The Apollo Alliance is a joint project of the Institute for America's Future and the Center on Wisconsin Strategy. The Apollo Alliance is a 501-c3 organization.


Energy & The Economy: The Facts

The United States has less than 3% of the world’s oil reserves, but accounts for more than 25% of global demand

The U.S. consumed 96.95 quadrillion Btus of energy in 2001, almost three times as much as the runner up (China with 36.67 quad), and approximately 25% of the world total.

2.7 million private sector jobs have been lost since January 2001, and more than 75% of those jobs have been high wage, high productivity manufacturing jobs.

Cities and their mega-regions face nearly $2 trillion of neglected infrastructure needs according to the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Department of Energy.

Every $1 Billion invested into public transportation supports 47,500 jobs.

Congestion cost American commuters 4.5 billion hours of delay, 6.8 billion gallons of wasted fuel, and $78 billion in 1999, and the problem is getting worse.

In the US, water and wastewater annually consume 75 billion kWh — 3 percent of the total consumption of electricity or equal to the total electricity consumed by the pulp and paper and petroleum sectors.

Buildings consume more than a third of US energy, and the average home produces more pollution than the average car.

Energy efficient buildings and appliances have higher labor content than traditional technologies, replacing wasted energy with high skill jobs.

DOE estimates that standards on clothes washers, water heaters, and fluorescent lamp ballasts will create 120,000 jobs through 2020.

Development of only 10% of the wind potential in the 10 windiest cities would provide enough capacity to reduce total U.S. carbon emissions by a third.

Renewable power production is labor intensive - wind power creates 2.77 jobs for every MW produced, Solar PV creates 7.24 jobs per MW, and geothermal creates 5.67 jobs per MW.

In the 1980s the US had an 80 percent share of the photo voltaic market; today we have 25%.



Apollo Alliance National Steering Committee http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#aansc

National Advisory Board
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#National_Advisory_Board

Labor Unions
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#3

Environmental Organizations
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#4

Economic, Social Justice, Faith-Based, and Regional Partners
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#5

Business Partners and Endorsers
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#8

Foundations
http://www.apolloalliance.org/about_the_alliance/#6


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. td
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. why wouldnt our economy continue to grow?
Of course we are going to have a recession here and there but if we stay on the leading edge of technology and development there is absolutely no reason why our economy wouldn't continue to grow. If you could provide some reasoning why it WOULDNT i would love to see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. The White House needs to put smarter trolls on its payroll............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. nonsense. wind and solar are ALREADY being used for electric cars.
this is a fabulous idea! il love it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. All you have to do to see it at work is take a drive through Iowa
and Southern Minnesota. Apollo Alliance is not a politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. If biodiesel and other alternative fuels were offered in the 7 big cities
in America, it would go a long way to reducing use and dependence on oil.
The big 7 being:
New York - 8,143,197
L.A. - 3,844,829
Chicago - 2,842,518
Houston - 2,016,582
Phoenix - 1,461,575
San Antonio - 1,256,509
Dallas - 1,213,825

In those seven alone there are nearly 21 million people, that alot of cars. Alternative fuels on a nation-wide scale is probably not feasable right now. But having them in the larger cities could help greatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. suv's
If people would get rid of their 'stupid utility vehicles' we would save millions more
gallons of gas............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. isn't that the truth
It's become the 4th rail of politics. If you come out in favor of common sense and againse using up our resources on something stupid all the stupid suburban bitches that have one kid and suddenly decide they need to drive an army tank will have a stroke and vote you out before you can blink. My mom raised me and my siblings just fine with a car.

Sorry to SUV drivers but I'm not holding back for anyone today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. suv
Yeah, I am pissed today, under the weather, but I am not giving anyone on the right
any ammunition today!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. my suv gets better gas mileage
than most of the cars in my parking lot so im not really all that ashamed of my purchase. Regulating pre-1990 hoggish engines that are v-8s getting about 7mpg is a lot more of an issue to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is Hillary buying Iowa votes.
I know I am such a skeptic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. and Minnesota votes. but i don't mind... i'd vote for her. this is a great
idea, and her moderate stance is so much better than any thug's stance that i'd vote for her in a heartbeat.

and given no other choice, i bet you would too. 8^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I worry about a GE with Hillary as the nominee
I think we need to pick someone more appealing to the red states. We can't afford another 8 yrs under republican tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Hillary? What the hell does she have to do with any of this. All
of these organizations have been working together on a workable energy program long before she started backing the idea. When John Kerry was in Iowa City campaigning he wore an Apollo shirt. I do not think Hillary is going to win much in Iowa or Minnesota - we are much more interested in people like Gore, Kerry and Edwards. What we are interested in is our colleges doing research in alternative energy (Apollo Alliance), our unions supporting alternative energy and our independence from oil as soon as possible by finding new ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Take it easy
I was just commenting on how her name was fairly prominent in the article. Maybe it means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Sorry, I do agree with you about her. I just get protective when it
comes to Apollo Alliance. They are a great group and have brought a large coalition of groups together to work on energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC