Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Defends Democratic War Critics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:56 PM
Original message
Lieberman Defends Democratic War Critics

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20060915/D8K5GC181.html

Lieberman Defends Democratic War Critics
Email this Story

Sep 15, 3:58 PM (ET)

By CARA RUBINSKY

AIRFIELD, Conn. (AP) - Sen. Joe Lieberman on Friday criticized Republicans who accuse Democratic critics of the Iraq war of encouraging terrorists, arguing such talk "demeans the freedom we are all fighting for."

This week, House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Democrats "are more interested in protecting the terrorists than protecting the American people." Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has raised the specter of Nazi appeasers in his attacks on war critics, part of the GOP's steady drumbeat of rhetoric contending Democrats are weak on national security.

"It is wrong for some on the right to imply that some Democrats don't care if the terrorists succeed, or that debating the merits of the president's policies on the war on terrorism emboldens our enemies," Lieberman said in a speech at Fairfield University.


Sen. Joe Lieberman speaks at Fairfield University in Fairfield Conn., Friday, Sept. 15, 2006. (AP Photo/Douglas Healey).


"That kind of attack on the motives of our fellow Americans and our right to debate and dissent demeans the freedom we are all fighting for and divides and weakens us as a nation," he said.

FULL story at link above.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:58 PM
Original message
Oops, I duped! self-delete
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 03:59 PM by ShortnFiery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too little - too late Loserman n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Huh?
Didn't you tell us a while back in a newspaper piece YOU WROTE that we should not criticize the boy king?
Ct. get rid of this a hole!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wondermanus Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too late Joe
Hmmmm....really interesting, Joe. From Salon.com:

After all, it was Lieberman who said that "if we pick up like Ned Lamont wants us to do, get out by a date certain, it will be taken as a tremendous victory by the same people who wanted to blow up these planes in this plot hatched in England. It will strengthen them and they will strike again." And it was Lieberman who warned Democrats, in a speech last December, that they put us all in danger when they challenge Bush's credibility on Iraq. "It is time," the senator said, "for Democrats who distrust President Bush to acknowledge that he will be commander-in-chief for three more critical years, and that in matters of war we undermine presidential credibility at our nation's peril."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Yes, Lieberman said all those things
but now he is trying desperately to keep his Senate seat and he will say anything to get votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Some" Democrats??
Now just what in the hell is THAT supposed to mean?? I may get pissed at the far left on a pretty regular basis, but I'd never say any of them want anybody to die in a terrorist attack. Sheesh. Way to smack the people you pretend to be defending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. flip-flopper NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clear Eyes is Awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. A day late and a dollar short, Joe! nt
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 05:32 PM by VegasWolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. He must be getting desperate.
If he had been saying things like that all along, he would never have lost his primary.

He always seems to jump when his polling begins to look seriously bad for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Which is why he will lose...
All of this wishy-washiness will just expose him as the gutless wonder that he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Heh.
This tells us that Joe is getting a lot of static from some of his collegues. So much, the backpedaling has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fjc Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Un fucking believable...
This is the guy who ran on criticizing his fellow Democrats for their criticism of the war, and now he wants to defend them? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Three Faces of Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsharp88 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. So now he'll support Lamont???
Seems the logical thing to do now that he's defended him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. An alternate headline:
"Lieberman flip-flops on war critics"

This guy... after those weeks of calling Ned Lamont the "Al-Qaeda candidate", and getting his ass kicked in a primary because of it. It looks like somebody finally explained it to him, way too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 02:57 PM
Original message
self-delete
Edited on Sat Sep-16-06 02:57 PM by Zhade
double-punched

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. So when will he repudiate one of his campaign workers calling us...
...terrorists for supporting Lamont?

Fuck you, lieberman. You're transparent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC