Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Services talk budget directly with OMB (Office of Management and Budget)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:01 PM
Original message
Services talk budget directly with OMB (Office of Management and Budget)

http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2112493.php

Services talk budget directly with OMB

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has allowed the military services to press their case for larger budgets directly with the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which according to sources has balked at increasing future year defense spending to meet the services’ projected needs.

The move is particularly critical for the Army, which wants $141 billion in 2008 alone — $30 billion more than the $111.8 billion requested last year — sources said. The direct discussions between the uniformed services and OMB are unprecedented, according to sources. Usually, the individual military services have to negotiate their annual budgets with the senior civilian leaders of the Pentagon, including the defense secretary and the comptroller.

...

Politics may be a factor in the White House involvement, sources said. Army complaints about a lack of resources just weeks before congressional elections in November could become Democratic ammunition to paint the Republican leadership as weak in supporting the military.

One person familiar with the OMB-services discussions, however, said the budget deliberations could be dragged out beyond the November elections, thereby undercutting political value of the issue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have to so that no one in the military has to rely on foodstamps
uh they did end that didn't they? I mean now that they have control of everything, I know it was a BIG concern of theirs when Clinton was President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting...on second thought, nothing to see here.
(We haven't actually approved or denied any increase.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC