http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/news.asp?ArticleID=104524Members of Iraq's US-backed Governing Council have quietly distanced themselves from a top cleric's call for direct elections before the transfer of sovereignty to Iraqis by July next year.
The Council members believe the problems of running a proper election in the present security situation would delay the formal handover of sovereignty. Washington agreed on a plan with the Council last month for regional caucuses to pick a transitional assembly, which will select a sovereign government to oversee the drafting of a constitution and elections. The plan hit a snag last week when Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani – the most influential religious authority for Shiites who make up 60 per cent of Iraq's population – said it was not democratic enough, reiterating an earlier stipulation that the constitution's architects be directly elected.
The head of the Governing Council immediately said the blueprint of the handover would be amended to appease Al Sistani. But representatives of its 24 members said on Tuesday direct elections to a body overseeing the process were unlikely. "In these circumstances it may be difficult to make it possible for all people to participate outside the country, and here with security circumstances as they are," said Adel Abdel Mahdi, a senior official of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), the top Shiite political movement.
"We are striving for it to have an electoral character." That view was echoed by other council members who argued direct elections could delay the formal transfer of sovereignty – a grim prospect for a US administration facing domestic pressure over troop casualties in Iraq as it begins its campaign for the 2004 presidential election.
<snip>
That didn't take long.