Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S.: Sadr City again a militants' haven

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:47 PM
Original message
U.S.: Sadr City again a militants' haven

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/15605762.htm

U.S.: Sadr City again a militants' haven
Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. soldiers trying to calm Baghdad say the sprawling Sadr City slum has once again become a haven for anti-American militants - and the source of most of the gunfire and mortars directed at them.

In the last two weeks, U.S. forces have suffered several casualties from dozens of shootings, mortar attacks and roadside bombings that American troops believe originated from Sadr City.

...

Instead of venturing into Sadr City in strength, U.S. troops are concentrating instead on the mostly Shiite neighborhoods that surround the militia stronghold. All the while they are drawing fire from Sadr City.

"I just want to see something done about Sadr City," said Staff Sgt. Brian Beem, 29, of Poughkeepsie, N.Y. "Send in the Iraqi army, the U.S. Army - send everyone in. ... They're going to need it. ... Something's going to have to be done about that place."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about Staff Sgt. Brian Beem and the rest of the foreign
invaders get the fuck out of these people's country? Will that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I agree. It belongs to them, let them have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACause Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Only problem with getting out
I think everyone of every political stripe can agree..while it's bad now on the ground..leaving would probably be just as bad...if you think it's bad now, wait til their are no obstacles between the Shiite and the Sunni...the Sunni had it good under Saddam...the Shiites are not going to let the Sunni forget that, nor forget that many of the Iraqi Army were responsible for the downfall of the first Shiite rebellion after the first Gulf War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The Iraqis are going to have to work out their differences between
themselves. We can give all kinds of help, as can the rest of the world, but they are not our children or our charges, they are adult human beings, with their own country, their own lives, their own futures. At this point, I agree with all of those people, of every political stripe, who say that the US presence is the biggest obstacle to a peaceful resolution in Iraq. The US needs to withdraw all troops from Iraq and then help in a civilian, non-armed manner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACause Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. With regret I have come to the conclusion
That what all Iraqi factions desire is not peace...but victory...not exactly the same thing. What can you expect of a people where one side still celebrates a victory in battle over the other (Shiite/Sunni) well over a 1000 yrs since the battle ended?

Withdraw yes...while the original mission was laced with fallacies, even the secondary "stated" missions by the Bush Administration can no longer be seen as viable. All our presence in Iraq will do is merely prolong the inevitable...a Shiite/Sunni war where the Shiite will triumph, they will ascend into power and push the Sunni into second-class citizenship, the very same enviroment the Sunni's placed on the Shiites...The Kurds if they are lucky will be able to survive unscathed, they've done relatively well on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Brian Beem has a death wish
Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 12:41 PM by saigon68
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. How many times have they invaded Baghdad & Sadr City now?
This is all pretty tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe Casey Sheehan was killed there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Saddam couldn't even get that place under (full) control.
It's not tank territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Madhi Army needs to be taken out
I don't care if US or Iraqi troops do it. If the milita isn't restrained it will send Iraq into a civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. al Maliki and al Sadr are hand in hand
if US tries anything now, it will get very ugly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maliki relies on Sadr's support in parliment
to keep Hakim from breaking up the country.

But, that said you can't have a several thousand man militia walking around Baghdad killing Iraqis by the dozens every day.

There is no good way out for Maliki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's been that way all along.
The correct word is "always", not "again". The Mahdi Army will not be "taken out", neither will it be disarmed. If anyone had the foggiest idea how that might be done, it would have already been done, long ago, when we were in a better position to do it. Some things can't be fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC