Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Warned on War Spending & Deficits (World Economic Forum)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:48 PM
Original message
U.S. Warned on War Spending & Deficits (World Economic Forum)

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=34887

U.S. Warned on War Spending and Deficits
Emad Mekay

WASHINGTON, Sep 26 (IPS) - One of the world's most exclusive business clubs warned the United States Tuesday that its open-ended national security and war expenditures, along with tax cuts that led to large budget deficits, could affect the country's status as a powerful economic force.

The Geneva-based World Economic Forum issued its 2006-07 Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) rankings and listed the United States in sixth place, down from the top spot, behind Switzerland, Finland and Sweden and just ahead of Japan.

The top 10 countries are all rich industrialised nations. They are Switzerland, Finland Sweden, Denmark, Singapore, the United States, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands and Britain.

The report says that with potentially even higher spending commitments in defence and homeland security, which comes with the U.S. war on terror and ongoing plans to lower taxes further, the U.S. faces difficult fiscal balancing.

"With a low savings rate, record-high current account deficits and a worsening of the U.S.'s net debtor position, there is a non-negligible risk to both the country's overall competitiveness and, given the relative size of the U.S. economy, the future of the global economy," said Augusto Lopez-Claros, chief economist of the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Network.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. wh will respond by cutting more social programs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. What, Me Worry?
Anybody got a picture of Alfred E. Neuman handy?

We're the United States. NO PROBLEM. Everything's fine. Nothing to be concerned about. THINK POSITIVE! BE HAPPY! BUY, BUY, BUY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The Nation ran a cover, see this link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. WhooHooo! We're #6! We're #6! Yeayaw! We're ehh... #6?
Reality starts to set in. Too bad many of the sheeple won't get it until after the elections. Hopefully enough of them will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares? The Rapture is coming!
The Republicans do not care one bit about bringing down the deficit. 90% of the Republican members of Congress believe that the Rapture is imminent. They really are stupid enough to believe that bullshit. Are they gonna be in for a rude awakening when China dumps the dollar and demands immediate payment of the bounds the idiot Republicans sold them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton had budget surplus

September 27, 2000
Web posted at: 4:51 p.m. EDT (2051 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton announced Wednesday that the federal budget surplus for fiscal year 2000 amounted to at least $230 billion, making it the largest in U.S. history and topping last year's record surplus of $122.7 billion.

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. bush will say it's "naieve" to think that spending money on perpetual war
is not a good idea or good for our country. he'll say it's a "mistake" that we aren't still the world's greatest economic power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. when you think of the money that's been pissed away, stolen, and . . .
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 12:57 AM by OneBlueSky
otherwise disappeared into the coffers of BushCo and their friends, it's enough to make you puke . . . and want to throw something at somebody . . .

like maybe an impeachment resolution at Bush . . .

and indictments at Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and a few dozen others . . .

imagine what that money could have been spent on . . . rebuilding New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, universal healthcare, infrastructure, creating schools that teach kids to think, developing alternative energies, and oh so much more . . .

instead, all "we the people" have to show for our money is endless war, a demoralized and over-extended military, a collapsing economy, a devastated environment, and the complete loss of international respect and admiration . . .

nice job, assholes! . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. another bomb for the democratic party arsenal.
i feel your pain republick party, i feel your pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well Duh!
Economists from the analytic school have been saying this for over 20 years! The late 80's recession is directly, mathematically correlated to the Reagan policy disasters. I published a paper that related this and the overspending on defense to artificially prop up the economy as conducted by the USSR. That was in 1985.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. i guess this admishtration is getting exactly what it wanted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. There are just to many
ways for all kinds of experts to point out the disastrous nature of this administration's policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Duh...
One needn't be a member of an exclusive business club to figure that one out...

Most of us figured this out years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. What, me worry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. And just why isn't this "breaking news" on the TV news shows?
It should be a major news story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC