Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Says No Change on Carbon Strategy: No limits on greenhouse gas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:58 PM
Original message
WH Says No Change on Carbon Strategy: No limits on greenhouse gas
NYT/Reuters: White House Says No Change on Carbon Strategy
By REUTERS
Published: September 28, 2006

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Bush administration has no plans to ease its opposition to national limits on greenhouse gas output despite talk that a change may be under consideration, a White House spokeswoman said on Thursday.

"The president has said continually said that one of reasons he doesn't like a mandated cap is because it has the potential to move jobs overseas and hurt the economy,'' said Kristin Hellmer, spokeswoman for James Connaughton, the chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Growing concerns about global warming have prompted California, Arizona and seven Northeastern states to take steps to bypass President George W. Bush and set their own greenhouse limits.

Bush pulled out of the 163-nation Kyoto Protocol on global warming in 2001, saying it would hurt the economy and unfairly left rapidly developing countries like China and India without limits on emissions.

A national cap on emissions would mean heavy industries in the United States, the world's top emitter of greenhouse gases, might have to make big decisions, like investing in alternative energy or clean-burning natural gas....

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-environment-carbon-whitehouse.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. :.....the potential to move jobs overseas and hurt the economy......"
so now they are against out sourcing?

I am confused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. it anything, having a good energy policy would vitalize out economy as
it would put researchers, scientists, workers. technicians together in a national program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Precisely - Kyoto, et al would CREATE good jobs and boost the economy
All those workers building light rail and other mass transit systems, workers designing and building hi-tech pollution controls, etc. They just lie through their teth, those mofos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. If your confused, then their propaganda is working...
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 05:52 AM by and-justice-for-all
...The entire Repuke party works like that; they make NO SENCE whats-so-ever all of the time and yet people still support these dumbasses. They are all about out sourcing and putting a cap on CO2 emissions has nothing to do with outsourcing jobs over seas...shurbCo is a fucking moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. People Love Cancer
Nothing like waking up in the morning to a cloud of smog.... inhale... exhale... ahhhhhh. All for the wealthy to prosper while we work like slaves for peanuts just to pay off high medical bills to remove that very Cancer. Isn't great being American!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why not? What's to stop them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jobs moving overseas is a concern that this White House has?
I'm confused, when did they change their position on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. I guess even more jobs that what they consider acceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. As opposed to having the seas moving over our jobs??
Hey, if the coastlines are under water, there won't be any jobs, you effing chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't hurt our "economy" - f*ck the environment instead - good thinking GW
.
.
.

Your economy is sinking

Ya might want clean air to breathe when your filtered air conditioner conks out in Crawford Texas as it fries with global warming.

We still got some clean air up here in Northern Canada,

But I don't think you'd be welcome up here.

Or anywhere for that matter . . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. GOP: Enviromental Fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. "This would have interfered with our oil profiteering" - Commander AWOL
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:33 AM by SpiralHawk
"Me and my 'elite' republicon oil cronies cannot be expected to suffer any kind of a reduction in our massive oil profites. So all you ordinary people can just shut up and sit down while the global climate goes shithouse."

- Commander AWOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I agree SpiralHawk
I don't believe Bush gives a rat's ass about the general national economy, the environment or the people. To say he sucks is to say a paramecium is small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lou Dobbs had a guest on the other night who said
Shrub's environmental guru is Michael Crichton. The guest was serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. It's unbelievable. He ignores all scientists and has a GOP sci-fi
writer as a consultant an a minor little issue like planetary sustainability. Kissinger should be in jail, but no...this unelected creep was such a success with Vietnam that he's back advising for Iraq. What a nightmare this all is. How anyone can still support such stunning incompetence is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gospel of Bush: Greenouse gases cost jobs, not outsourcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Gosh, what a shocker!
Who could have guessed THIS?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. He's staying the course. Can you blame him?
It's working so well in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. this country is being run by idiots . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Strategy? This is not a strategy, it's the absence of one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. We're winning at Russian Roulette -- let's play a few more rounds! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC