Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay penguin book shakes up Ill. school

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:02 AM
Original message
Gay penguin book shakes up Ill. school


SHILOH, Ill. - A picture book about two male penguins raising a baby penguin is getting a chilly reception among some parents who worry about the book's availability to children — and the reluctance of school administrators to restrict access to it.

The concerns are the latest involving "And Tango Makes Three," the illustrated children's book based on a true story of two male penguins in New York City's Central Park Zoo that adopted a fertilized egg and raised the chick as their own.

Complaining about the book's homosexual undertones, some parents of Shiloh Elementary School students believe the book — available to be checked out of the school's library in this 11,000-resident town 20 miles east of St. Louis — tackles topics their children aren't ready to handle.

Their request: Move the book to the library's regular shelves and restrict it to a section for mature issues, perhaps even requiring parental permission before a child can check it out.
...
"My feeling is that a library is to serve an entire population," she said. "It means you represent different families in a society — different religions, different beliefs."

Lilly Del Pinto thought the book looked charming when her 5-year-old daughter brought it home in September. Del Pinto said she was halfway through reading it to her daughter "when the zookeeper said the two penguins must be in love."

"That's when I ended the story," she said.
...
She said the book was then moved to the nonfiction section because it was based on actual events. In that section, she said, there was less of a chance that the book would "blindside" someone.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061117/ap_on_re_us/gay_penguins_book_flap

God forbid we learn about "actual events" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's best that young students be kept from factual animal stories.
Homosexual undertones, indeed. I can see the lawsuits already, from parents CONVINCED that their 13 year old "caught the gay" from reading a true childrens story about penguins.

Keep them the hell away from the history books then, and it would be nothing less than abusive to let them crack open The Bible, considering the stories therein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They're too chained to wooden literalism
to be willing to see instances of homosexuality in the natural world, else they might have to admit it's part of the natural order of things like anything else. Hell, that's one of the things that cured me of fundamentalism...I couldn't discount what was obviously empirical evidence, the cognitive dissonance was too great. I'll stick to reason and science nowadays, thanks...

Todd in Cheesecurdistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. Good Lord Yes!
can't have kids learning about Alexander the Great or DaVinci (not the stupid code!) and those kinds of people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who's teaching whom???
"Some parents of Shiloh Elementary School students believe the book...tackles topics their children aren't ready to handle."

IMO, some parents may not be ready to handle this topic. Is there any indication the children aren't ready?

Also, this looks like another example of Faux-News type "journalism" using the "some people" tactic to avoid factual reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Welcome to DU, Henryman!
You make a great point :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh thank God its not "Heather Has Two Mommies"!
:sarcasm: mode now off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychmd Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great book
My partner and I have had this book for awhile. We have adopted three children currently 5, 3, and 2 years old. They love this book. Mainly because they are obsessed with penguins. It is wonderful to have children books with diverse families represented. I don't think reading dozens of Dora the Explorer books have turned my kids hispanic yet. But, I am keeping a close eye on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Blindside someone?
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 07:48 AM by Bassic
Why are so many Americans (at least it looks like there are a lot of them, maybe they just make a whole lot of noise) hell-bent on remaining ignorant, and keeping their kids ignorant? This is just one more manifestation of that.

Edit: I should say North-Americans, because we've got our fair share of them up here as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I wondered about that
I haven't read the book. But does it suddenly turn into:

"Ling and Bing, the male penguin friends and lovers, say goodnight to Tango, and retreat into their Penguin bedroom. There, in the privacy of their igloo, Ling undresses Bing with soft kisses and looks up to Bing to say "Oh, what a large icicle you have!""

Because if it's not explicit like that, and it's just two male penguins that care for each other and raise a child penguin, I don't see how you can be "blindsided".

p.s.: Sorry for the "penguin porn". I've never written anyway, and didn't know if I'd be any good at it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. rofl
penguin porn :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Seething mound of
...PENGUIN LUST!!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Notice it's the parents that can't deal with this...
...not the kids. When parents complain about "topics their children aren't ready to handle", they are projecting their narrow-mindedness on their kids. Truth can be shattering when one lives in a world of illusion. It's time to ditch the fantasy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Does the library require parental permission for books saying a man and a woman must be in love?
Southern Illinois isn't what you'd call a hotbed of progressive thought, so the fact that the book is available at all is a near miracle.

Still, I am just so freaking sick of having the moral values of the least moral among us applied to all of us. Pandering to the haters is no way to end hatred.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Rose Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Southern Illinois
:headbang: "Southern Illinois isn't what you'd call a hotbed of progressive thought, so the fact that the book is available at all is a near miracle."

Oh, come on now, just drive through any of the smaller towns in So. Illinois and you can see just how thoughtful many are. Unfortunately, many find it necessary to place signs in their front yards to remind them of what they are thinking, such as: The Ten Commandments and I Love Jesus. The local sign makers are hoping they will have another thought soon that they don't want to forget.

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. You got that right! Welcome to DU!
I live in Central Illinois, where it's not noticeably better. Here, they don't put signs in the yards, but the first question people ask when they meet you is "What church do you go to?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIU_Blue Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Fine I admit it...
I was drawn to reply to this thread purely to join the legions of other So. Ill DU'ers.

;-)

Oh yeah, and about the Penguin thing, wouldn't want something like reality to interfere with homophobic dream-worlds.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. but that's what penguins do...
while the egg is gestating, dad is sitting on it with a whole bunch of his buddies who are watching their eggs. Many eggs dont make it so there are solitary males in the flock. The women have gone off to eat and will return many weeks later.


hmmmm.... maybe we have much to learn about penguins that would be socially disruptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
36. Male humans should do the same
They spend so much time siting on the couch with their buddies, they should be sitten on an egg while their at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. People - some...are gutless wonders.
They talk a good game about life, love, and family but when confronted with the realities of life, love, and family it scares them so badly they have to hide it from view.

If two penguins adopting an orphan as their own scares you, you probably are a pathetic little
piss-pot of a human. And if a book about those penguins scares you, you're a waste of oxygen.

Those penguins did what comes natural and as a result a life was saved, a family was born, and a lesson in love was taught - if that's a bad thing for human children to learn then there's something terribly wrong with humans.

The kingdom animalia will never conform to the learned ignorance of its human members...and that's a good thing. A very good thing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Perhaps the library shouldn't stock "Three Men and a Baby"
movie in their library. What would the kids think of that????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Christ on two sticks....These homophobic people are getting way outta control
Is just a fucking book about animals raising a baby. Good God Almighty...:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Blindsided by the words, "They must be in love"?
*sigh*

Somewhere, someone is ranting about this book to a spouse, in front of their kids, and there's a kid who is coming to the realization that he/she is gay and his/her parents won't accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. LOL - I love it - "homosexual undertones"
is that like a heterosexual overture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olshak Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Just another shining example...
...of how the penguin population is flaunting their immoral lifestyle in front of our human children. Everyone knows that God only invented penguins for animation purposes in children's movies and baby seals for clubbing. This travesty must stop now!

:P :P :P :P :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliceWonderland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. Oh gawd, I just saw this story on MSN and wondered if anyone had posted about it
My first thought -- of all the real problems facing schools and children and society in general, what kind of parent would devote energy to... gay penguins? One single book on a shelf? It looks like a fine children's book from the illustrations on the cover (I also like the stuffed penguins flanking it in the pic). And it seems to be sitting on top of Harry Potter... which some parents have a problem with, too... oh no, gay penguins on top of Harry Potter, we have a moral crisis!

Honestly. You'd think parents would be spending their time working on child hunger or public funding for education or health care coverage for families. This is what I don't get -- the folks who seem to have all the time/energy in the world for hysterical moral outrage -- "I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell ya, that homosexual penguins are forcing the gay liberal agenda on the CHILDREN, won't someone think of the CHILDREN!!!" -- but little apparent interest in the real issues that affect families.

Free the penguins! Free the penguins!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yeah, they should definitely restrict access to it.
They'll need a basement vault with three foot-thick steel walls and a hydraulically locked door requiring a palm and retina scan to open. That should make sure the children aren't exposed to the high-intensity gay rays emanating from the book. I bet one look at that thing is enough to make a boy want to play with dolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. You know what? I have a 10 yr old

I haven't read this particular book, but I'm pretty sure that, even at age 10, if it was read to him, the most he would get out of it is a sort of "awww, they raised the baby". He barely gets images of people boinking, much lest penguins, and they all look the same anyway...

The only way they would infer any homosexuality out of this is if the concept were introduced to them.

As adults, we think two men living together = homosexuality, but kids just think two men living together = two men living together.

Honestly, did you watch The Odd Couple on TV and think that Oscar was boinking Felix? No, neither did I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You got it!
My 6 year old boy would think exactly that. It's the fundies who are attempting to make it "lewd."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Oscar was boinking Felix? Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's a true story!
What don't they understand about that. It belongs where it is and they should move back to their little bubble of denial if they don't like it. They can't continue to make up the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. The "family values" crowd doesn't like actual family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's very odd that two beings of the same
sex would be considered gay because they cooperate to raise a baby. Why is that?

The moral of the story is that a lone male or a lone female should never help raise someone else's baby? Interesting concept. Nannies better be careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm sorry, I don't understand:
These people are threatened because of a fictionalized account of two PENGUINS raising a chick together?

What the FUCK is WRONG with these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. IMO, because it is based on a true story
This book is based on an event that really did occur in a zoo. If the fundies admit that two animals of the same sex can successfully raise offspring, their mantra of "ban gay marriage to save the children" begins to look even weaker than it already is.

This is a lot like the episode of South Park where the teacher, Mr. Garrison, assigns couples in his class an egg to represent a baby. If the egg breaks, you fail. Kyle and Stan are the "gay" couple, and Mr. Garrison is determined to see them fail to show how gays are unfit to be parents and thus stop Big Gay Al and Mr. Slave from getting married. He even goes so far as to hire a hitman to "assasinate" the egg :-) It's really scary when South Park episodes explain so well the thought processes of actual people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. Jeez, it's a good thing they don't know that 1500 species have gay individuals
There are at least 1500 species that we know have lesbian and gay individuals - heck, lions are bot gay and incestuous, brother having sex with brother. Orangutangs make dildoes, dolphins have intespecies sex, and one out of every ten seagull couple are lesbians. Homosexual dolphin couples stay together for years, while heterosexual dolphin affairs are usuall one night stands. 90% of all giraffe sex is gay intercourse. As a matter of fact, there are no species where one has proven that all individuals are exclusively heterosexual - except in asexual species.

And when it comes to these narrow-minded bigots, they're worse parents than the gay penguin couple. I'm sure many of you can vividly imagine being one of these children and discovering you're gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. I once had a woman try to explain this to me...
...why she was so threatened by the idea of her kids seeing any depiction of anything that might be even remotely tolerant of same-sex couples. It had nothing to do with fearing that the Evil Gay Rays would infest her kids. It wasn't even fear of seeing explicit behaviors. It was because she was TOO DAMN DUMB to figure out how to explain to her 7-year-old why two men were holding hands.

I suggested she try "because they love one another, honey" and leave it at that, and her head exploded like a Martian listening to Slim Whitman.

I guess the idea of LOVE between two people is a damned radical and frightening concept.

(Then again, I had a very similar conversation some years back with a woman who would let her preteen kids watch R-rated movies that were so rated because of violence, but not because of nudity - and what it came down to was that it was easier to explain why people wanted to kill each other than why they wanted to have sex with one another or see one another naked. She was too embarrassed to explain sexual desire to her kids, but did not find explaining the wish to do harm embarrassing in the least. If that isn't a sad commentary on our sick society, I don't know what is.)

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. That reminds me of something I once read on a web forum two years ago-
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 10:46 PM by FVZA_Colonel
It was about the time that the Dawn of the Dead remake came out, and someone was posting about how their parents wouldn't let them see it because a woman was topless in it, though they had been willing to let him see it before they found out. I am now paraphrasing one of the responses-

"so your parents were ok with letting you see a movie in which a baby gets shot, a woman gets her shit ruined by a chainsaw, someone is crushed by a bus, and in which there are more examples of cannibalism than I can count (including a child devouring her father)? Ya' gotta love American morality."


This country has its priorities so fucking screwed up (I am not trying to condemn Dawn of the Dead, but just saying that out of all the things we worry about, something related to sexual and/or gender issues causes people to get into such a tizzy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Come out of the FREEZER, you PENGUINS!
It had to be said.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Sweet Jesus! Rick Santorum Was Right!!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. This school needs a good bit more "shak[ing]"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyBob Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
37. I never understand....
The fundies have no problem with dropping cluster bombs and whiskey pete on middle easterm children, or having their kids see violence on TV. But even a vague undertone of homosexuality is enough to get them matching in protest. Very strange moral priorities, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. It's because it hits too close to home...
Most of them would never dream of dropping bombs on children; but sexual fantasy is in their human nature; and they've been taught to repress it...especially if it involves someone of the same sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
38. It's ridiculous of AP to title this article in that manner.
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 05:57 AM by Progs Rock
In what way shape or form are these penguins gay? Bizarre. These homophobes need to get a grip on reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FernBell Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
39. This is so frickin' ridiculus. 200+ years since the Bill of Rights and we're still banning books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. well, they'd better cancel the school trip to the zoo, or the waterfowl refuge
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 05:40 PM by Lisa
I've worked at a few such places, and all of them had same-sex animal couples which had formed bonds or even built nests together! (In the case of one pair of male swans, it was an enormous, blatant structure that took up the entire path, and the "boys" took turns sitting on it, honking triumphantly.) I don't ever recall there being a problem with explaining it to visiting children -- while some of those past toddler stage did ask which birds were males and which were females, they did not get flustered or say it was "bad" for these situations to exist. At another place, the all-female groups of hooded rats or hamsters who slept cuddled together only prompted "awwwwws", and pleas to be allowed to pet them.


p.s. I've read the book, and it's cute. It doesn't show the grownup penguins in a compromising situation (which is more than can be said for the real-life ducks in the pond across from my office right now ... I've observed numerous homosexual and heterosexual duck encounters there, and quite a number of them appear to be non-consensual, basically "rapes").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
43. I work with young kids,
we recently had a book fair, and it was a high lighted book. I took the time to read it and most of it would 'fly' over most kid's heads. The kids that would 'get it' would be in the situation and it would surely make them feel good about themselves. I have several kids being raised in gay households. The only problem I have had was figuring out who to call when there was a health issue and how to address them ( I settled on asking which dad I need to call and refer to them as parents). It felt a bit strange at first, but now it just rolls off the tongue. I try to be as natural as possible-and for these kids it was a blessing that brothers and sister are together. We chuckle sometimes at the predicaments (the guys managing sister's fairy princess birthday party), but God bless them, I didn't see too many folks stepping in to raise a family of 3 kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. Cripes! It's a true story about ANIMALS. morans! Cut me a friggin break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC