|
or impeach them, as Congress does?
In the CA-50 special election between Busby and Bilbray (after the highly corrupt Repub, Duke Cunningham, resigned and went off the prison), it appeared that Bilbray won, but there were many irregularities in the vote counting, which was highly non-transparent, and a challenge of the vote was in progress, when House Speaker Hastert whisked the Republican, Bilbray, off to DC to quickly swear him in. The opposition took that the court, and a lower CA court said that Congress's power to certify its own membership trumps any court's opinion of the election process. I don't agree with that ruling, and it was not tested on appeal (I think the case is now moot--but not sure). Anyway, that's the state of things now. Congress can trump an election. (--and, indeed, in a presidential election dispute, Congress can choose the president).
But what of state legislatures? (I don't have a clue as to the answer--I'm wondering if anybody here knows.)
I agree that Caltagirone's switch of parties is a big betrayal of the voters. What are the legal (as opposed to mere political) remedies?
I also understand that one of the big things at issue is the fight over election reform in the PA state legislature. Republicans need non-transparent elections to gain and keep power. A Dem majority will likely enact at least some election reform aimed at transparency--although in both state legislatures and Congress we have many Dems who are beholden to Diebold/ES&S and brethren, and/or are just plain corrupt and have sold away our right to vote for lavish lobbying perks and control of the "Help America Vote For War Act" billions. Still, any hope of reform (at least up until now) resides with the Dems and Dem control over election law. I'm wondering to what extent Caltagirone's corruption, and switch of parties, are connected to non-transparent, Bushite-corporate controlled electronic voting systems.
|