|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
democratic
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:03 PM Original message |
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. What is unacceptable is nuking Iran. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
32. Amen, man! AMEN! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. These Democrats start playing war games and they will be out on their asses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think the Dems should start talking with Iran now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phusion
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. What a great example that would be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I threw the question up in GD:P. Let's see what happens n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, well then I guess we'd better start talking and making nice, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. If the freakin' Dems go around scared they'll shit their pants if labeled soft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkeyman
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. This I know I will get hit on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. A nuclear U.S.S.R. was unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. a nuclear US is unacceptable. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emald
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
54. here here. I am in complete agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
70. That's what I'm thinking too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
81. I second that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
86. exactly. maybe we should be an example and disarm ours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cigsandcoffee
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
10. I hope there is a nonviolent way to prevent their nuclear ambitions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. I hope there is a nonviolent way to end Nuclear Weapons in the US, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cigsandcoffee
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. They don't now, but they are trying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Directly opposite what i said, and opposite reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cigsandcoffee
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. That's very idealistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 02:03 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. No, but we must show that we are serious about nuclear proliferation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritersBlock
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 05:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Has Israel signed the NPT yet? Or India? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
82. I see the DPRK is a signatory as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
33. Iran's government keeps saying that there is. According to them, we need to talk to them first. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cigsandcoffee
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:56 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. The UN just established sanctions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:12 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I need to research what was being asked of who and how much pressure the warmongerers were applying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. But a nuclear Pakistan, India, Britain, Russia, Israel, NK, US, etc. is ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. Which Democrats ever said that a nuclear NK was ok? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
56. Or a nuclear China? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Deleted message |
Wcross
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. Israel will handle their own national security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Deleted message |
Wcross
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I didn't say it was right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
57. Doesn't sound like much of an "observation," especially with the "end of story" part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. You are as clear as mud with that statement stranger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Uh, not end of story. you are forgetting one big roadblock... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
71. Lol funny but cute picture! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
15. "Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
77. "Unacceptable." The new thing we all know. Always a buzzword/phrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. Hoyer also said: "the new Democratic Congress will encourage contact with Syria and Iran" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
17. How things change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ckramer
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. Democrats --> don't be silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkeyman
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Yes it does Now and Before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayWhatYo
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Haven't you ever heard of respawning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
23. Pro-war democrats is not acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ckramer
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Remember their names. Vote them down next time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PFunk
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. It's crap like this is the reason why I'm still an independent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I think we can prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons if we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
76. Why is Israel probably the reason why Iran wants nukes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. The Iranians consider Israel to be the enemy and vice versa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
29. Thanks for aiding the likes of Richard "Prince of Darkness" Perle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
39. oh, god, don't tell me the Democrats are on board with this Iran thing . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcdean
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
41. We need a counter-argument; not just complaints. Here are a few points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. GREAT POINTS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
43. Another AIPAC whore beating the drums of war! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #43 |
60. NOW. It becomes clear why Hoyer won over Murtha... (Links) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Nancy Pelosi supported Murtha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Hoyer prevailed because AIPAC is a powerful lobby that you don't cross... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. AIPAC was only a factor, but not the primary factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Countdown_3_2_1
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. Nuclear Iran: "Wipe Israel off the Map!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Listen carefully: IRAN DOES NOT HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. Come back in six years, when everyone believes is the first time Iran would have a bomb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #44 |
67. Iran has never promised to wipe Israel off the map. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #44 |
87. "I support any action Israel is forced to do" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
45. A communist Vietnam is Unacceptable!! See how they all sound alike! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ckramer
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
48. Consider that the link is from the jpost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. The editor of the Jerusalem Post is an American neocon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. So-and-so USED to be on the board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Hollinger still owns the Jerusalem Post and it is run by American neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #53 |
68. So what does CanWest Global and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. Everything I can find says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Anyone and anything linked to Richard Perle is toxic, dangerous to peace and to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
50. oh boy, welcome to the next iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
51. U.S. or Israeli Attack on Iran Could Contaminate the Middle East |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Attack On Iran Could Bring Devastation to Arab World |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #55 |
85. and to us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvasconcellos
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
63. I feel sick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 01:21 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
72. I never did like Hoyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
74. Theres major campaign of PR talking about invading Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
75. amen. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
junior college
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
79. Diplomatic and economic sanctions won't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plant
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
80. Leaves little wiggle room |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
84. A nuclear U.S is unacceptable with this administration at the switch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC