WP: Democrats Revise Agenda To Deal With War in Iraq

[laststeamtrain]

Democrats Revise Agenda To Deal With War in Iraq
In Anticipation of New Bush Strategy, They Take Spotlight off Domestic Policy

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 8, 2007; A04

Democratic leaders who had hoped to emphasize their domestic agenda in the opening weeks of Congress have concluded that Iraq will share top billing, and they plan on aggressively confronting administration officials this week in a series of hearings.

Pushed by House members who want a quick, tough response to the Iraq strategy President Bush is expected to announce this week, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has backed off from her initial assertion that nothing should detract attention from the legislation she hopes to pass in the first 100 hours of House debate.

Late last week, she summoned the chairmen of the Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, intelligence, Homeland Security, and Oversight and Government Reform committees to plot a series of hearings. On Thursday, they will call Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee to defend the war-strategy shift Bush will outline in a nationally televised speech.

A House Armed Services Committee hearing with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, planned for Jan. 19 was abruptly moved to this Thursday after consultations with Pelosi. And leadership aides went to work on a response to Bush's speech that they hope will be delivered on national television after the president's appearance.

In the Senate, the Foreign Relations Committee will hold hearings Wednesday on the current situation in Iraq, then grill Rice on the president's plan Thursday. Pace and Gates will go before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Friday.

"Iraq is the elephant in the room," said Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee and a close ally of Pelosi's.

<more>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/07/AR2007010701097_pf.html

[KingFlorez]

1. It's a trap

This is exactly what they wanted Democrats to do, to shift focus from the 100 hours plan.

[papau]

2. Or it is the right move for which they were elected - stopping a pointless war?

I suspect we can do both the 100 hours plan and make a lot of noise about Iraq in the same 2 weeks.

The GOP have already gone to war - no cooperation - even on increasing the minimum wage - so we are looking at House passed stuff that dies in the Senate. On the minimum wage the GOP are now demanding business tax cuts!

[ShockediSay]

4. How would * know the point? He always ducked or ran away

from combat when his *ss was on the line.

[papau]

6. true - the whole administration is 2nd rate minds w/ no courage to oppose monied folks

and their corporations

[IndianaGreen]

3. No, Pelosi is going ahead with the 100 hours plan as she should

Having hearings on Bush's surge are a Constitutional imperative that has to be done. Even the fence sitters can read the polls about Iraq, and Bush's sinking numbers.

[aquart]

5. So they do it in the NEXT hundred hours, big effing deal.

But thank you for your concern. It's actually more important for the Democrats to be seen opposing escalation than for George to have to face a minimum wage increase.

[KingFlorez]

7. Whatever