Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: 'Gated communities' planned for Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:24 AM
Original message
LAT: 'Gated communities' planned for Baghdad
'Gated communities' planned for Baghdad
New U.S. strategy calls for creating zones of safety in the Iraqi capital, then working outward.
By Julian E. Barnes, Times Staff Writer
January 11, 2007

WASHINGTON — The military's new strategy for Iraq envisions creating "gated communities" in Baghdad — sealing off discrete areas and forcibly removing insurgents, then stationing American units in the neighborhood to keep the peace and working to create jobs for residents.

The U.S. so far has found it impossible to secure the sprawling city. But by focusing an increased number of troops in selected neighborhoods, the military hopes it can create islands of security segregated from the chaos beyond.

The gated communities plan has been tried — with mixed success — in other wars. In Vietnam, the enclaves were called "strategic hamlets" and were a spectacular failure. But counterinsurgency experts say such zones can work if, after the barriers are established, the military follows up with neighborhood sweeps designed to flush out insurgents and militia fighters.

The strategy, described in broad terms by current and former Defense Department officials, is an attempt to re-create the success military units have had in smaller Iraqi cities, most notably Tall Afar.

For the last two years, the military has been focused primarily on training Iraqi security forces. But under the new plan, the primary mission of American combat forces in Baghdad will be to protect Iraqis living in the city....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-military11jan11,0,1685855.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um.. Mortars and rockets can go over gates...
And grenades, etc.

And vans filled with plastique can sometimes go through gates, yadda yadda...

Is it just me or is the "stupid" meter about to break on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nice
After billions of dollars, this is the plan for winning the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, these ARE the ONLY kind of neighborhoods that Bush is familiar with. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What is it ...
with Bubble King and isolated environments?....sucks to be him though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess they'll be "Eatin' good in the neighborhood."
What about the rest of Iraq, you bastards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another possibility: "Baghdad 2025: The Pentagon Solution to a Planet of Slums"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. think: warsaw ghetto
what a nightmare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Think: Indian reservations - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Or the walls in Belfast
Separating the catholic and protestant neighborhoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. But with RPG's and an enemy that isn't starving/fighting to the death...
Stalingrad works too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is a kinder, gentler version of the cordon and search tactics already in use.
One huge problem was that the Iraq government would not stand up
to the Sadrists when they protested cordoning off Sadr City.
In effect, the cordon and disarm program was applied mostly
to the Sunnis. The insugents eventually trickled back in.

The only new twist here is that U.S. troops intend to stay
in the neighborhoods this time, risky to say the least.
This is otherwise the same pacification strategy U.S. forces
have tried and failed for the past five months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. From July 2006 in Ramadi
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2371081&mesg_id=2371081

"Now, American commanders are trying something totally new," the article continues. "They are going to get rid of it, planning to bulldoze about three blocks in the middle of the city and convert them into a "Green Zone," a version of the fortified and largely stable area that houses the Iraqi and American leadership in Baghdad."

Creating mini "green zones" or "gated communities" within Baghdad , aside from the bulldozing, is basically the same thing they were talking about doing in Ramadi back in July of 2006.


From July 2006

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Solly%20Mack/53

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2371081&mesg_id=2371104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hmmmmmmmmmmm!
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 05:02 PM by tenaciousradical
The Pearly Gate Zones or The Pearly Gates Estates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. New and Improved Strategy!
Sounds a lot like the old and failed strategy. A lot of our guys are still getting kiled in Ramadi.


'Gated communities' planned for Baghdad
New U.S. strategy calls for creating zones of safety in the Iraqi capital, then working outward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Guaranteed to recruit hundreds to the Iraqi resistance.
> "They are going to get rid of it, planning to bulldoze about three blocks
> in the middle of the city and convert them into a "Green Zone" ...

Has it not occurred to the genius who drafted this up that those "three
blocks in the middle of the city" would have been the homes and total
possessions of a lot of people?

How do you think they will feel about this?
How do you think they will react?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. There was also a "surge" back in Oct of 2006 in Baghdad
that the "Generals on the ground" deemed to be "simply not working"

"The spike in U.S. deaths has also had a sobering effect on military commanders, who for the first time this week admitted that the plan to bring more U.S. troops into Baghdad to pacify the city is simply not working, and needs to be re-thought."


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=3091528&mesg_id=3091528

The plan then was also to "pacify the city"...just as the same plan Bush promoted in his "surge" speech the other night.

and Yes, you're right, I think...it will recruit more "insurgents"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Weren't these called "safe hamlets" in Viet Nam
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 05:18 PM by daleo
And didn't that fail? (maybe it was "strategic hamlet")

I listened to Gates and Casey for a bit today. If you just mentally replaced "Iraq" with Viet Nam, "Baghdad" with "Saigon", and so on, their speeches could have been written in 1967.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. They will look like "Tasty Acres" in that Lily Tomlin movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh, thank goodness! All the Iraqi millionaires will be safe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. The new feudalism, a Republican's dream
Why shouldn't the "quality people" benefit more? Regardless of what they put into the system, they should be sustained as paragons of virtue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. "In Vietnam, the enclaves were called "strategic hamlets" and were a spectacular failure."
How reassuring.

3000 more will die, bushco will leave office, and the next president will begin the withdrawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. The comparison to the strategic hamlet program is actually a poor one...
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 07:59 AM by ellisonz
In the tactical sense, although it does have some strategic significance.

"Strategic hamlets" were primarly in rural South Vietnam and not in urban zones. Also the SH program was from 1961-1965, relatively early in the American phase of it, as opposed to a "last ditch" effort.

The problem with this concept is that Tal Afar was a city of 150,000 and Sadr City alone has 1 million people. So the scale they want to do this on makes no sense because 21,500 more people on top of the 50-70 thousand soldiers in Baghdad is still not enough to actually do the job of cordon in search. If they actually try to carry out this plan our troops will be sitting ducks. All you have to do is look at the map of Baghdad to see how irregularly planned the city is and then realize that there are an inumerable amount of allyways and damaged buildings, which provide excellent hiding places and passageways. It's a game of whackamole, and we're the mole. Forget the IED's, the insurgents are just going to switch back to sniping and hit and run attacks. Crud.

There is no military "solution" in Baghdad, much less Iraq.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC