Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats may push to shutter war prisons (Gitmo, Abu Ghraib)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:23 PM
Original message
Democrats may push to shutter war prisons (Gitmo, Abu Ghraib)
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 06:25 PM by Cheney Killed Bambi
House Democratic leaders yesterday outlined plans to try to force the Bush administration to close the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba, taking aim at two sites that have sparked an international furor over the Bush administration's war policy.

Representative John P. Murtha, the chairman of the powerful Defense Appropriations subcommittee and a close ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, said he wants to close both prisons by cutting their funding, "to restore our credibility worldwide." If he succeeds, it would force the administration to find a new location for high-value terrorism suspects.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/01/13/democrats_may_push_to_shutter_war_prisons/

Great news! Democrats deserve this smiley: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the Pentagon wants to black list lawyers have you ever heard
of such an outrageous suggestion. How in the hell can you blacklist a lawyer for defending a client accused of a crime. That would be another direct violation of the constitution.

I think, we as Americans ought to photocopy the constitution and send it to every single republican official in this country. And we should tell them that when they took their oath of office one of the provisions of the oath says you must support and defend the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Looks like not only do republicans are shredding it all over the place they probably don't know ANY of the provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Instead of the ten commandments, why don't we post the constitution?
Everywhere, a section at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Eliminate funding for keeping anyone in prison who is not given every right protected
either by existing criminal law under our Constitution or the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

I will accept nothing less than that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. considering include not extending troop deployments
Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat who oversees military funding, said he will propose tying congressional approval of war funds to shutting the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba. Other conditions he said he is considering include not extending troop deployments and giving Soldiers and Marines more time to train between deployments.

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,122161,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. An irreverant aside!
When I saw the title of your message, I went into rage mode. :banghead: "The dems want to put shutters on the cells to give the prisoners privacy while they're being tortured?!? :wtf: Just shut the damned places down!"

I've recovered. That was a knee-jerk reaction based on my frustration that Dems take far too long to reach...:blush:...oops, I'm about to commit another faux pas!

Over and out! :yoiks:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL. That's a funny misunderstanding.
As for your other faux pas, I'm not able to guess it, but that's okay, I don't want to know. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ...I'm not able to guess it...
Are you one of them born again abstainers? Seems like it! :rofl:


(To the OP: I hope you'll forgive my inserting humor into your very serious piece. Sometimes laughter just pays a visit, and right now, I'm happy for the company.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't it a little late for Abu Ghraib? It's no longer ours.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 12:29 AM by crickets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu-Ghraib#Transfer_to_Iraqi_control

On March 9, 2006, the U.S. military decided to close Abu Ghraib prison and transfer prisoners to other jails in Iraq.<6>The prison was reported emptied of prisoners in August 2006.<7> On September 2, 2006, Abu Ghraib was formally handed over to Iraq's government. Ali al-Dabbagh, a spokesman for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, stated "The Abu Ghraib detention facility was handed over to the Iraqi government." The formal transfer was conducted between Major General Jack Gardner, Commander of Task Force 134, and representatives of the Iraqi Ministry of Justice and the Iraqi army.<8>


Tomgram: Lost in a Bermuda Triangle of Injustice
The Facts on the Ground
Mini-Gulags, Hired Guns, Lobbyists, and a Reality Built on Fear
http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=123690

Of course, its prisoners who remained generally uncharged and without access to Iraqi courts, weren't just released to the winds. Quite the opposite, over 3,000 of them were redistributed to two other U.S. prisons, Camp Bucca in Iraq's south and Camp Cropper at the huge U.S. base adjoining Baghdad International Airport, once dedicated to the holding of "high-value" detainees like Saddam Hussein and top officials of his regime.

Camp Cropper itself turns out to be an interesting story, but one with a problem: While the emptying of Abu Ghraib made the news everywhere, the filling of Camp Cropper made no news at all. And yet it turns out that Camp Cropper, which started out as a bunch of tents, has now become a $60 million "state-of-the-art" prison. The upgrade, on the drawing boards since 2004, was just completed and hardly a word has been written about it. We really have no idea what it consists of or what it looks like, even though it's in one of the few places in Iraq that an American reporter could safely visit, being on a vast American military base constructed, like the prison, with taxpayer dollars.
____


New Iraqi prisons have cropped up to fill Abu Ghraib's place, and will continue to do so if no one's paying enough attention. Spending restrictions are a good start. Stop paying contractors like KBR to build these monstrosities! Gad, don't we have better use for our taxes? We could have equipped soldiers with that money. What they really need to do, though, is pass new laws or enforce the old ones that make prisoner abuse illegal.

As for gulag Guantanamo, that crap has been going on far too long from day one, and it's a relief someone's finally addressing the problem. There's a stain on the country's integrity that will never go away. Applause to the dems, I truly hope they succeed in getting it closed--without allowing another to take its place elsewhere.

Good luck on that given how the CIA loves their prisons so, and given how much money is involved, for Agency as well as the contractors. Tom Engelhardt's assessment is very grim.


edit: added last paragraph
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. How about breaking the CIA into a thousand pieces
and scattering them to the winds, like JFK proposed doing 45 years ago?

p.s. better yet d how about burning them and then burying their ashes in a concrete bunker five miles beneath the sea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC