|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Scairp
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:09 AM Original message |
Wal-Mart pharmacist denies couple morning-after pill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's good she went to the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citygal
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. Just mentioned this under another thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Pappa
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. What is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. I hope that pharmacist's ass gets fired. I don't know what it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. I bet he has no problem handing out viagra. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
129. Yeah, and if Jeeeesus wanted you to have a massive boner, he'd a GIVEN it to you "naturally" NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #19 |
143. If he refused to dispense Viagra (that'll be the day), it'd make your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Fired? He works at Wal-Mart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. It's an over-the-counter drug! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. i can see it now...i'll go get a job at walmart and then refuse to ring anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. me me me!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
105. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
120. Nominated for post reply of the year! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. I believe that Plan B requires a pharmacist to dispense it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SquireJons
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. No, he shouldn't have referred them to another pharmacist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Oh I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPrax
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Or a vegetarian running a steak house! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I just ordered some from drugstore.com. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
138. you can keep a spare set of bc pills around = same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
74. The article says a "pharmacy worker or sales associate" can sell it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #74 |
94. Then that sounds like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
107. He should have done his fucking job instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
volstork
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
57. I COMPLETELY agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
101. You know, that's the best argument I've seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor Venmkan
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
176. Actually it's not "exactly" fully O-T-C |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
6. When those newspapers want PERSONAL information, you should accomodate them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bob Loblaw
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
62. You can be Ophelia Thigh, Jack Meoff, Hugh G. Rection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
114. FYI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:34 AM Response to Reply #114 |
128. If you use computers all over the place, they have trouble keeping up with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #128 |
166. Another version of anonymizer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. Recommended. And off to Greatest this goes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
10. I suggest someone check that "pharmacists" qualifications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harpboy_ak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Right to lifers are against contraception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
69. "Rabid LiferNuts" lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #69 |
134. Errrrr... look below. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Unfortunately, you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
83. No, it causes abortion if conception has already occurred. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. WRONG!! It keeps the fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #84 |
91. If conception has occurred, a life is being destroyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #91 |
98. That's your opinion, and that's all it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #98 |
106. Well. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. That's an absolutionist's argument, and logically inconsistant as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. Damnit, how many times does it have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #111 |
199. thank you for noticing that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #106 |
124. hmm...which one of your biology degrees was in "sanctity"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #124 |
152. Indeed. "Sanctity" is neither a scientific nor legal condition, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magrittes Pipe
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #124 |
164. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #106 |
141. Then women who have abortions are murderers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #106 |
158. So you'd refuse tapeworm meds, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #106 |
174. "Either all life is precious or no life is." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #106 |
213. Two degrees in biology? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #91 |
109. And what about all of those fertilized eggs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #109 |
194. Isn't that the medical definition? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #91 |
116. LIFE begins at BIRTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 02:48 AM Response to Reply #116 |
125. I thought life began at 40... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #125 |
200. no - it's 55 now since I'm now 54... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #91 |
133. Oh yes. A blob of undifferentiated cells with no nervous system feels pain and suffering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
193. Even accepting your definition of when life starts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:21 AM Response to Reply #193 |
201. and as usual, he's a man making "choices" for WOMEN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #201 |
212. Well, it certainly makes it easier to be anti-choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #83 |
142. according to the WHO it does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #83 |
173. How soon do you think implantation takes place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
115. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
161. Yes. The point that the news stories deliberately obfuscate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. I wonder how many Amish policemen there are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
73. This opens the door to employer discrimination against fundies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:41 AM Response to Reply #73 |
131. Questions of that nature are already asked, and they should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
117. What's this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. To the pharmacist..."Maybe you should mind your own FUCKING business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XanaDUer
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. Can these pharms be sued for child support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. My thoughts exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
15. i don't think this guy is a pharmacist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lowreed
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Guess he thinks life begins at orgasm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #21 |
46. If that's true it will soon be illegal to throw away a kleenex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crossroads
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
96. LOL - Good one! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
126. Mine certainly did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Gardener
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
16. Bravo to Ms. Byrd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
26. So if I were a Christian Scientist, could I refuse to dispense all drugs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
27. Deleted sub-thread |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
28. I don't want it to go this far. But maybe it has already happened... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
163. This could happen in my case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
29. FIRE THE DUMBASS. If he doesn't get fired, then it's time to picket the WalMart who hired him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #29 |
50. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
30. Laws as of October 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Nothing for Ohio, so this Christofascist is screwed...right?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. It is probably just a list of states passing laws since 2005 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnneD
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Conscience clauses for pharmacists & Must-fill states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
130. Is there anything more annoying than calling these obscene laws "Conscience clauses"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #130 |
157. they should be called medical obstruction clauses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neurotica
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #130 |
196. I prefer to call them "refusal clauses" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Pharmacists need not fill prescriptions they disagree with has far-reaching implications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. The American Pharmacists Association needs to be hit hard on it's policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #38 |
168. WTF? He refused to fill a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Unless, they haven't revised Ohio Law this is the section they tried changing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. The language they tried to enact during 2001-2002 session |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Language they tried to enact in 2003-2004 session |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:41 AM Original message |
Current language unless Ohio online is incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
75. Why are there special laws for pharmacists and other medical workers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #75 |
112. I wonder just how many of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Or gay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:29 AM Response to Reply #75 |
127. Medical workers should start refusing to treat Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
167. Connecticut has a law on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankeyMCC
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
37. The law says he can ridicule her by laughing? A**hats! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
44. No one in the entire store was willing to give this couple the pills? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. They are OTC in that a prescription is not needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. I didn't realize that. Is that a state or federal provision, do you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I think it's an FDA rule unless states have something different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #48 |
76. According to Princeton's Emergency Contraception Website ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Thanks for that info, Battydem. So a pharmacist is not needed for the sale after all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
47. Anybody here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Your analogy isn't working for me. At all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
72. THANK YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Fuckin' Jesus. You are comparing a steak dinner to a lifetime of raising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #47 |
58. False analogy. Try to be somewhat intellectually honest, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
146. How many of these pharmacists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. One has to be responsible for his or her own convictions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #146 |
187. THE MORNING AFTER PILL IS NOT AN ABORTION DRUG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
59. Hm. That's a tough one, all right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #59 |
82. They will wait until you tube bursts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #82 |
103. Diagnostics are better now so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #103 |
159. They had Sonograms in 1983 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #82 |
144. Good God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
86. Few, if any, people would argue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. Truly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grizmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #86 |
100. again a false analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:31 AM Response to Reply #100 |
140. Exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #86 |
102. OK, this is getting ridiculous... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #86 |
118. Maybe because it's not HIS FUCKING CHOICE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #86 |
136. Try again, ma'am. Here's how people like you want things to be: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #86 |
145. Three things-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #86 |
147. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. The time to choose whether you are willing to do the job or not is when you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #148 |
178. Ok, what if you chose to be a pharmacist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #178 |
181. Then you have to make a choice. What if you chose to be a pharmacist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #147 |
150. The difference is obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #150 |
160. Exactly. Therein lies the crux of the problem! If one has been trained with critical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #150 |
179. I'll have you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #179 |
182. It's tragic to find such an illogical and fallacious atheist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:37 PM Response to Reply #182 |
185. I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #185 |
190. Now you're misstating yet again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #190 |
205. Clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #190 |
214. He's not an atheist, he's a rightwing troll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #179 |
183. there is NO WAY to grant "personhood" to a fetus/embryo/zygote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #183 |
186. That was the same argument used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #186 |
189. That argument is completely inapplicable. COMPLETELY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #189 |
206. They have one similarity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #186 |
191. False. The right to abortion does not rest on the personhood or lack thereof of the fetus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #186 |
198. Fine, then show me how constitutionally it can be done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #198 |
207. Laws "force" duties on people all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Mon Jan-22-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #207 |
216. you obviously have not the faintest clue what you are talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #179 |
184. Oh, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #184 |
188. Admit it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #188 |
192. Again, false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #192 |
209. I understand your argument perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #188 |
197. If you knew the first thing about atheism, you'd know it's not based in belief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #197 |
210. Again, here you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. Christ on a motherfucking soda cracker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:38 AM Response to Reply #188 |
204. but a mass of cells IS "subhuman". Period. IT'S NOT HUMAN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:35 AM Response to Reply #179 |
203. sure you are - just because you say so on the "internets" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #86 |
162. incredible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #86 |
195. And presumably, a vegan wouldn't seek a job as a butcher, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:31 AM Response to Reply #86 |
202. your use of quotes around PRO-CHOICE tells us a lot.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #86 |
215. They are not allowed to force their beliefs down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #47 |
60. No hypocrisy, just two really bad analogies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. No, vegetarian & vegan markets can refuse to sell meat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
65. Simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
68. You are SOOOO right, dude. I can't get over the unmitigated gall of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
70. The difference is they are not required to cook a steak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldcoot
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
78. The pharmacist refused to sell Wal-Mart's product |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #47 |
81. Excellent question, although few here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. All of us "get the point", it is not very complicated. We simply disagree with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. "Taking a human life?" There is no taking of a life here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Shhh! Don't confuse the fundies with facts! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #88 |
104. DemBones makes a B U L L S H I T point. The pharmacist isn't performing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grizmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #81 |
95. they aren't being forced to do anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #81 |
97. You would open up a can of worms that will not be closed up that easily... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:11 AM Response to Reply #81 |
132. What rubbish. If it goes against my beliefs to fill heart medication,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #81 |
135. Let's see you stick to the "principle" when you get sick and end up in a hospital fully staffed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #81 |
151. No one's asking Wal Mart pharmacists to take a human life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Moreover, since ordinary hormonal birth control pills can cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. It happens all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
169. Oh, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 07:00 AM Response to Reply #169 |
170. I see none of the Fundy Tag Team bothered to comment on the El Salvador thing. Here's the link again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #170 |
171. Yeah, I noticed that, too, CPD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #171 |
172. Way ahead of ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldcoot
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #81 |
177. Why do pro-life pharmacists deserve special treatment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grizmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
93. Your analogy is not valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nodehopper
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
110. as everyone here already pointed out, this is a flawed analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
175. What a ridiculous, intellectually dishonest argument. How embarrassing for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
52. Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unca Jim
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
53. Well, those poor bastards have to work work with the idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
55. Not professional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmc62
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
56. The way plan b works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Welcome to DU and thank you for those pertinent facts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
61. LOL a Wall Mart pharmacist! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
66. Sue Wal-Mart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaygore
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
67. Serves them right for shopping at Wal-Mart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Y'know, for some people there aren't all that many choices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #67 |
99. Because some people live in podunk towns.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
77. StallMart sucks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
80. Ask the Pharmacist for a Pregnancy Test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyWeasel
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #80 |
90. PWNED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
89. SUE THEM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
119. Every Sperm is Sacred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #119 |
121. Let the Heathens spill theirs on the dusty ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
122. I find abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vickitulsa
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
123. I have a theory about why the "conscience clauses" are being approved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #123 |
139. we are the only nation that doesn't guarantee health care for its citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
137. I thought the law on the pharmacist's side sez that someone else must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
154. Key here is this person stopped another person from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #154 |
156. He shouldn't be able to do either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #154 |
208. DING DING DING! DearAbby, you're our grand prize winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cut.your.crap
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
165. Don't count on it being a Pharmacist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #165 |
180. The article specifically mentions the Pharmacist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC