Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Anti-Buildup Measure to Have Bipartisan Stamp: Will be introduced by Biden, Levin, Hagel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:42 AM
Original message
NYT: Anti-Buildup Measure to Have Bipartisan Stamp: Will be introduced by Biden, Levin, Hagel
Anti-Buildup Measure to Have Bipartisan Stamp
By CARL HULSE and JIM RUTENBERG
Published: January 17, 2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 — Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, an outspoken Republican critic of the administration’s Iraq policy, will join two leading Democrats in introducing a resolution opposing President Bush’s buildup of troops in Iraq, putting a bipartisan stamp on the looming Congressional showdown over the war.

Lawmakers and aides said Mr. Hagel had been consulting for the past few days with the two Democrats, Senators Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Carl Levin of Michigan, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, to develop the wording of the resolution, which could be introduced as early as Wednesday....

Mr. Hagel said the intent of the resolution was not to “bash the president” or to call for the immediate withdrawal of United States troops from Iraq, but a responsible way for senators to register their opinion on the increase of more than 20,000 additional troops announced by Mr. Bush last week.

While Senate opponents of the buildup were preparing to move forward, Senate Republicans backing the president were trying to map their own strategy, considering proposals that could appeal to Republicans frustrated with events in Iraq but keep them from supporting the most critical resolution....

***

Members of both parties in the Senate have said as many as a dozen Republicans may ultimately support a resolution against the president’s policy. Mr. Hagel’s participation could ease the concerns of other Republicans about breaking from the president....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/17/washington/17cong.html?hp&ex=1169096400&en=4ac53d86ccd8ee80&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's true! Bush is a uniter, not a divider!
Mission accomplished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Hopefully so...But game aint over till the "fat lady sings"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. And where is our worthless democratic senator, Ben Nelson, in all this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. stephen colbert NAILED this sham on The Word.
watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. YES!! He was excellent on this exact issue last night.....
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 11:59 AM by halobeam
Non binding resolution. LMAO oxymoron. you betcha!...

edit to add: Biden once again, just pissed me off when it counts MOST. Damn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. This "sham" comes before using the "power of the purse."
It's the first step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. >>>>>>Mr. Hagel said the intent of the resolution was not to “bash the president”
Bash away! Who else in America deserves it more?



Well.....OK......Cheney does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC