Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman: No Need For Iraq Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:50 PM
Original message
Lieberman: No Need For Iraq Resolution

http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-lieberman-surge-0118,0,4179590.story?coll=hc-headlines-home

Lieberman: No Need For Iraq Resolution

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman said today he saw no need for a new congressional resolution supporting President Bush's planned Iraq troop surge, a step some Republicans are discussing.

"The president has the authority to do what he's proposing to do," said Lieberman, an independent Democrat who has become one of Bush's biggest Capitol Hill Iraq war backers.

Congressional talk this week has been dominated by how and whether lawmakers will vote on trying to curb Bush's authority or funding for the mission. Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, R-S.C., an ally of Lieberman's on war strategy, has discussed countering those efforts by promoting a resolution saying that the Bush strategy "could bring about success if properly supported."

Lieberman strongly supports that view, but did not seem enthusiastic about such a measure, principally because he believes the 2002 legislation that gave Bush broad authority to wage war is sufficient.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. More likely Lieberman knows Graham's bill will fail creating more embarassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Bingo
Looks like Mr. Gung Ho doesn't have much of a backbone, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fascist enabler...
"The president has the authority to do what he's proposing to do..."

Forget about the thousands of young men and women who'll die for a lost cause, right Joe? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. So when are Jihad Joe's kids going to fight in Iraq?
They're NOT?????????????????????

It's time for LIEberman to cut the bullshit and put his kids on the line, If he won't then he needs to shut the fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. KISS. MY. ASS. HOE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. THAT. SAYS. IT. ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sorry to be so crass
but this man has earned a special place. He disgusts me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I didn't think you were being crass at all.
In fact, under the circumstances, I think you were being unforgiveably polite.

Lieberman is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. lie berman is no less a traitor than
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 05:19 PM by discerning christian
BENEDICT ARNOLD !! I , like Zell Miller, "wish we still lived in the days of DUELING"!! Choose your weapon Joe !!!:nuke: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. "an independent Democrat" - not true, he is not a Democrat he is a CFL
Don't associate him with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. One more day, one more showing of true colors...
LIEberman (RETHUG PIG - CT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. An independent Democrat?
Just exactly what the hell is an independent Democrat?

"The president has the authority to do what he's proposing to do," said Lieberman, an independent Democrat who has become one of Bush's biggest Capitol Hill Iraq war backers.


One who didn't take the hint from the Democratic voters and take a hike?

It is so nice to have Lieberman so close to holding the balance of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. He's not. ( holding the balance of power )
Check this out....Joe means nothing.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/18/211259/764

There has been some confusion and uncertainty as to whether Joe Lieberman has the power to flip control of the Senate to the Republicans. I come bearing good news!! As of this past Friday (January 12), it appears that Lieberman is powerless to effect party control of the 110th Congress.

This is due to the fact that the Senate passed a resolution on January 12 (S.Res. 27) that designates various Democrats by name as committee chairs and specifies the Democratic members of each committee. The Senate also passed a similar resolution (S. Res. 28) the same day that names various Republicans as the ranking minority members of each committee and specifies the Republican members of each committee. Based on these two resolutions, the membership of each standing committee in the Senate appears to be fixed for the duration of this Congress. Further, it includes one more Democratic member than it does Republican members in each case, thereby providing Democrats with control of the committee system and the flow of legislation in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. No need to investigate Katrina either although that's what he swore
to do during his campaign. I'd call him a flip-flopper but he's nothing but a totally rancid pile of sewage with lips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Breaking: No need for Lieberman
He has to go. Can the good people of CT recall him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, if Hoe Lieberman said it, then it must be true.
Sealed with a kiss.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Par for the course for the mighty LieberQuisling. Pfft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. will someone tell quisling to shut up already? sheesh.
thanks DLC for saddling us with this albatross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. the media really needs to STOP calling this clown 'an independent **Democrat**'
what i want to know is WHAT did they promise him for him to take up the pom poms of a bushista cheerleader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. We can help - every time we mention him it should be as
"the former democrat, Joe Lieberman".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. True enough, a new resolution to continue is not necessary.
That does not mean, however, that congress cannot pass a resolution forbidding continuance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Lieberman = clown
He is simply disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Lieberman = republican
They voted for him, they own him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. You damn well know it too redqueen nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. I would gladly give up ...
the Senate in exchange for Lieberman NOT associating himself with Democrats.

Besides, at the rate we are going, a Dem President is a lock, and quite frankly I do not want either party to have control of all three branches of power.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, that and they would lose BIGTIME, and it would be made
even more obvious just how bankrupt their so-called "ideas" are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let's send Lieberman to Iraq next Monday
got his size in combats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Lieberman kissing the Junta's butt is hardly "late breaking news" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Iraq Resolution, no need for Lieberman
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. I wish I could type what I'm thinking
but then I'll have a few cops at my door... :grr: :grr: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :grr: :grr: :rant: :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. Fuck you Joe ! You are a republican in independent's clothing.
You always did go along with the pukes and still do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. You know Joe, when you enable a war criminal, that makes you guilty as well
Just a thought, Joe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Joe the new Zell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why doesn't he just accept Jesus and complete his journey to the Dark Side?
The man once described by AIPAC as "Israel's best friend in the Senate" has turned out to be America's worst enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
32. I wish Senator Palpatine... I mean LIEberman, would crawl back under his rock.
I guess the Repukes must be threatening to out Lindsey again. Why else would he propose a resolution that doesn't have a prayer of passing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tchunter Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
36. voters: iraq resolution, no need for Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC