Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC Reacts To Bill O'Reilly's Bias Criticism ("sad and pathetic")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:54 PM
Original message
NBC Reacts To Bill O'Reilly's Bias Criticism ("sad and pathetic")
PASADENA, Calif. - Bill O'Reilly's criticism of NBC News as a liberal-leaning network is "really kind of sad and pathetic," the network's news president said.

Steve Capus attributed the Fox News Channel host's criticism of the network to O'Reilly's ongoing feud with MSNBC's Keith Olbermann.

O'Reilly has said NBC News, as an organization, has gone sharply to the left. He cited the network's decision last fall to begin referring to the sectarian violence in Iraq as a civil war, a phrase the Bush administration has resisted.

"I think it's really kind of sad and pathetic, some of the things that he's been lobbing at us these days," Capus told reporters Wednesday. "I don't quite understand it. I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth and there's real momentum behind Keith's broadcast."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16688461/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, Wrong thread...
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 06:01 PM by mediaman007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Keep it Keith you are gonna give him a stroke
I kid I kid I just meant a cerebral vesicular accident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. hmm... so it's GE vs. Murdoch now
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. GE is the Devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another slogan for Blotchy Bill
Add to "wholly without merit" the epithet "sad and pathetic" to describe Mr. O'Reilly.

I offer these comments to Fox for free. Use them in any way you see fit to advertise Mr. O'Reilly's program! I won't hit you up for any consulting fee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why can't you people understand?
When Bush says that the hanging of Saddam Hussein was botched, he's right. Of course. But when Tom Brokaw says the exact same thing, he's a biased liberal.
The problem the right has now is that the facts are, in their view, liberal. Yes. The facts are now biased. Where does that leave the right? Anytime NBC, or any reputable source, reports the news...they're reporting facts. And those facts are "liberal."
This is a sad time to be a conservative. You've got nowhere to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That's it in a nutshell
Thanks. Well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. And This.......

Just a few days ago John Bolton also said Iraq is in a civil war, is he a biased liberal too?

O'Reilly claims NBC has moved to the left because they say Iraq is in a civil war, yet many Republicans are saying the same thing, funny how O'Reilly never reports that. Not to mention every other news outlet in the world is calling it a civil war, except for FOX and CNN.

-------------

Bolton: Well look, the fundamental point is whether the civil war that exists now is going to continue or whether the Iraqis are going to decide to live together in one country.

www.crooksandliars.com/2007/01/15/john-bolton-calls-iraq-situation-a-civil-war/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. But to be fair you must balance those facts with opinion
Then you have Fox News...Which by the way is losing viewership faster than Iraq is losing citizens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Faux news is where they go
Any Faux does their best to keep the mushrooms in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. "Reality has a liberal bias." -- Colbert n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. facts gets in the way of fascism.
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 03:44 PM by SemperEadem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. All he forgot to add...
"bless his heart." He's "really kind of sad and pathetic, bless his heart."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Were you born in the South too?
I read a hilarious article a few years ago by a fellow Southerner explaining how you can say just about anything about a person and still be considered polite if you just add the words, "Bless his/her heart."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, I'm not a Southerner
I read that column. It was Molly Ivins. So many Southernisms are useful and expressive, I've adopted some of them. That's one of my favorites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tchunter Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. all i know is that i can't wait for o'reilly to get pwn3d on colbert tonight
papa bear's stepping into the eagle's nest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Self delete
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 04:37 PM by NobleCynic
Self delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bill is really grasping for straws. He seems to not mind...
Tucker Carlson and had no objections when Tweety was up Bush's ass. Now that the Bush line is not being towed by the greater media, he doesn't like them anymore. Fox's bias is showing at it's worse over Iraq. They are the only channel that is still parroting Bush's BS. Like it or not, alot of the MSM has turned their back to Bush. There are many Democrats to be found on many netorks these days(the playing field is less tilted towards the Right wing). According to O'Reilly, that makes these networks "liberal". According to right wingers, "fair and balanced" means panel after panel of Republicans spouting right wing talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. One of the "media experts" who appears on Keith's show
sorry...drawing a blank on his name...the guy with the glasses (like that helps) seconded what you're saying about the "fair and balanced."
What's happening is, the right feels that if you don't give any faction of their dissent it's voice, you're not being fair. But the truth is, often the over-whelming facts tilt the scales so clearly that the "other side" doesn't warrant "equal" time. For example, why do the creationists, who have no science behind them other than the fairy tales from their "think tanks" of theology degree scientists, feel they are equal to the real science of evolutionist theory based on reams of real data?
Arguments are not always equal. The dissenters deserve to be heard. But do they truly deserve equal time in every instance? This seems to be what the right wants.
Does this mean pedophiles deserve an equal audience to voice their beliefs that sex with children is not only normal, but healthy? Absurd? Yes. But the right wants their arguments to always receive equal treatment -- even when their stem cell arguments or global warming arguments don't have nearly the foundation as the opposition.
They are bullying the media with their "fair and balanced" to mean, our voices must get equal time...even when the facts are clearly in opposition.
And, so, we get Frist diagnosing a brain dead woman as "alert" via his video interpretation. Nevermind the fleet of doctors and nurses who had been caring for the woman for years. We must give the loonies on the right their equal time or they cry foul.
Our time is getting wasted with all these pointless digressions which have no factual basis other than personal beliefs and because O'Reilly wants to believe he's right. Or Rush. Or Hannity. Facts be damned.
And the club they use to beat us with is their "fair and balanced."
If only they were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. You may be thinking of Richard Wolf.....nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. equal time was abolished in the Reagan administration
if they have complaints, then they need to go dig up their boy and put it to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Billy-boy, you're nothing.
Why the hell whould give attention to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. So what if NBC is gone to the LEFT!!!
And why is the NBC News president even responding.

This is how the right-wing nut jobs work.
They find a left leaning story that a network has broadcasted.
They then accuse the network of being liberal.
Network apologizes and starts broadcasting RW news.

You think Faux news cares that everyone accuses them of being RW?

Neither should NBC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. NBC really really does not care at the moment
Keith Olbermann has done wonders for their ratings. And the bottom line, for NBC, is profit.

If anything I'll bet they're quietly looking for another Keith Olbermann-like figure to throw on the air. And I'll bet CNN is, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. As opposed to being fair and balanced by toeing the Bush line, right?
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 03:40 PM by Miss Chybil
Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC