Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force demonstrates non-lethal weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:56 PM
Original message
Air Force demonstrates non-lethal weapons
Air Force demonstrates non-lethal weapons
http://www.tribstar.com/statenews/cnhinsall_story_025003212.html
Technology key to next generation of warfare

By Kari L. Sands
THE VALDOSTA DAILY TIMES (VALDOSTA, Ga.)

VALDOSTA, Ga. — U.S. troops throughout the world are involved in complex peace-keeping operations that often require the use of non-lethal force.

The Active Denial System, a weapon that meets the criteria for non-lethal force, was demonstrated to the media Wednesday morning at Moody Air Force Base.

The ADS is a non-lethal, long range, energy weapon. The system projects a focused beam of electromagnetic millimeter waves up to 500 meters to induce an intolerable heating sensation on an adversary’s skin, repelling the individual without causing injury.

Personnel involved with this evolution in warfare technology gathered at Moody to discuss alternatives for peacetime and wartime missions. Theodore Barna, assistant deputy under the Secretary of Defense, began by saying, “We are defining emerging technology needed by warfighters, then putting the effective technological advances in the hands of our warfighters.”

Col. Kirk Hymes spoke on his area of expertise, including management, planning, and policy issues regarding non-lethal weapons.

“We stay in tune with the needs of the warfighters,” said Hymes. “They have told us that they need more non-lethal weapons as a lethal response is not always the best defense. These non-lethal weapons like ADS demonstrate technology that is truly transformational. It’s effective and equally compelling at five meters or 500 meters.”

Stephanie Miller, technology advisor for Radio Frequency Radiation Branch, said, “At 95 ghtz., this short wave length reacts very superficially. We have looked at cancer, infertility, and birth defects as results and have detected no risks. The risk of even the most minor injury is one-tenth of 1 percent.”

“It’s an amazing weapon with the same effect on everyone. It’s very consistent,” Miller later added.

The Air Force has been conducting research on the effects and enabling technologies since the late 1980s to develop the ADS. The ADS will provide military personnel with a weapon that has the same non-lethal effect on all targets and can be utilized in crowd and mob dispersal, checkpoint and perimeter security, area denial, port protection, and infrastructure protection among other military uses. With a millimeter frequency wave that reaches a skin depth of about 1/64th of an inch, more than 600 volunteers have participated in testing. All testing strictly adheres to the procedures, laws, and federal regulations governing human research. The tests involving humans have been reviewed by an Institutional Review Board composed of a diverse group of qualified experts.
http://www.tribstar.com/statenews/cnhinsall_story_025003212.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. How does this effect elderly? People with medical conditions? Remember the TASER is "non-lethal"
yet how many people have died as a result of being tasered?

Very frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "someone in the path of a HPM burst might be cooked like a meal readied by a microwave oven"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Scares the hell out of me...........
because it's going to be used on civilian populations somewhere, and there's no guarantee the damn thing is non-lethal on children, the elderly, or those with already compromised systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I bet these bastards would love to demonstrate this on Jan 27th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Intolerable?
If a crowd decides that King George's policies are more intolerable than brief bursts from their little ray-gun, it may have no effect. What do they do then? Fry people alive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. The timing of this announcement wouldn't be intentional, would it?
Nah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is a noble idea
that is perfectly suited to be used in all the wrong ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm sure Hitler thought the Final Solution was a Noble Idea as well.
This was by it's very design to be used in all the wrong ways to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's going to be tested on protesters first...
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 11:39 PM by Az_lefty
remember that asshole AF general that wanted to test these new weapons on protesters? He wanted to make sure they were safe before using them on enemy combatants.

(can someone help me with the link?)

Found it: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060913&articleId=3213
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. California is about to make spanking illegal so this sounds like a good alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I just read your tag line.....
please tell me that idiotic asshole didn't actually say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I copied it word for word from a video clip.
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 11:20 AM by Kablooie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Can someone help me on this please?
> It’s effective and equally compelling at five meters or 500 meters.

How can this be true?

I thought that the effect would drop off due to the inverse square law
and so if the weapon has the desired effect at 500m then it would be
devastatingly dangerous at 5m as the intensity of the beam would be
so much stronger?

If the beam is "focussed" at 500m (or whatever is the range setting)
does this just mean that it will be out of focus at 495m and so not
as intense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC