Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rape victim jailed after reporting attack (denied emergency contraception)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:19 AM
Original message
Rape victim jailed after reporting attack (denied emergency contraception)
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 08:37 AM by Jokerman
(Thanks Madfloridian for posting this in GD. I think this need wider attention.)

http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=2212387&version=3&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1

"They were more interested in prosecuting her for something that's a paperwork snafu from four years ago, that was juvenile. They were more interested in working on that than finding an experienced rapist," stated the victim's mother.

"She was not allowed bond, and the medical staff at the jail refused to give her the Morning After Pill even though it had been prescribed at the hospital."

"The medical supervisor would not allow her to take the pill because she said it was against her, the supervisor's, religion. So, here we have a medical supervisor imposing her beliefs on a rape victim," claimed the victim's attorney Virlyn Moore. "As a human being, how someone could be so violated by this monster and then the system comes along and rapes her again psychologically and emotionally - it's outrageous and unconscionable."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JacksonWest Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, theres no excuse for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Someone needs to lose their job over this.
The medical supervisor should not be working in a job that causes her to violate her beliefs. I would suggest employment in a senior center where contraception is a non-issue. But in any case, the medical supervisor needs to be canned for non-performance of duties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The rapist could claim that rape is a sacrament in his religion
That would make just as much sense as what the medical supervisor said. She should be fired along with anyone else involved in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
63. You know, you're right --
that's the very same kind of imposition of one's "religion" that happened with the ACTUAL situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. The hospital should be sued for violating her civil rights.
If it's wrong to force someone to act against their religious beliefs, it's even more wrong to have your beliefs trumped by someone else's!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. The supervisor
should lose their job over this. One shouldn't be in a field where they feel that there may be a conflict of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. The suervisor should be charged as an accessory to the crime.
:grr:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. I wouldn't go that far...
However, she/he should be fired and not allowed to hold such a position anywhere else...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. I Would.
That's exactly what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. Accessory to rape?
I don't really follow that line of thinking. What she did was completely wrong, but it doesn't put her in line with a rapist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Well Since an Unwanted Pregnancy is Very Often a Product of Rape
I would say that the Pharmacist is assisting in inflicting this abuse onto the Victim, and therefore
is as accountable as the Rapist. Here the Victim is at least trying to forgo that heinous result,
and this Pharmacist is refusing the Victim her own rights, on the selfish grounds of their own Religious beliefs. The person needs to be fired and charged.
That'll teach 'em! If you can't do your job then get out!:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dean Martin Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
79. I would, if the victim becomes pregnant as a result
I sure would charge her as an accessory. Refusing treatment over religious beliefs? She should be charged, and fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JacksonWest Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I read the whole article-and the situation is unacceptable.
The way they treated her was shocking. An outstanding warrant related to restitution in a juvenile proceeding-shocking.

The funny thing-not really funny-is that event coupled with the religious beliefs of the jailer are going to result in a settlement for the victim. It's one thing to put her in jail for an outstanding warrant. You can get away with that. But for someone to deny you medical treatment-in jail- that has been authorized and ordered by the hospital-because of their religious beliefs is every kind of wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. In many states you can't even out her in jail
If she was an adult in my state, for instance, she couldn't even be arrested for an outstanding warrant (unless it was murder) after she turned 18.

When I worked for Juvenile Justice Services, the policy for 17 year olds was that, if it was really something serious (like rape or serious assault, not joyriding), it would get passed on to the Adult DA's office downtown. Otherwise, they got probation and probably treatment, and you just hoped they completed it. If they were very close to being 18, like 17 and 9 months, the case was usually just dropped.

Arresting a rape victim for not paying a fine when she was a kid? It's so totally insane I almost hope it's some kind of hoax. I mean, this required DOZENS of people all saying, "Well, according to the regulations..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JacksonWest Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:14 AM
Original message
Good point. However, in Michigan you can still be arrested on the warrant-
and placed in custody(I'm from Mi). Ultimately, if they want to pursue charges against you(that are juvenile charges and you're an adult) they have to bound the case over to circuit court-agree to try the case as an adult- and do so.

It's an odd situation. Restitution not being paid in juvenile cases happens all the time. I'm surprised that it took four years for the system to catch up with her. Either way-this was the wrond way to handle the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. As I said on an earlier thread, this woman's employed by the state.
Therefore, her making a stand on religion is tantamount to the state making a stand on religion. That is way, way, way beyond a private sector pharmaceutical employee making a stand on religion in denying treatment, particularly when we're talking about a prisoner who can't just take the car over to the next city because SHE'S IN JAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Very good point. I want to know that the person who refused her medical
treatment won't be able to do that again. I want to see her sue that police dept who decided to arrest her and let a rapist continue to commit rapes. The message I am getting is if you are a woman with a warrant it is ok for you to be raped and assaulted. You deserve it and we will arrest you if you report it. It is beyond belief that a victim can be made into a criminal like this. What a message they are sending to women and rapists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacGregor Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. Not so sure about that.
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/01/30/Tampabay/Rape_report_starts_tw.shtml">Jail medical services were contracted out:
...
Debbie Carter, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff's Office, which runs the jail, said she couldn't comment on the situation because medical information is private. But she said medical service policies are set by Armor Correctional Health Services, which contracts with the jail.
...

If the medical supervisor was a contracted employee, I don't know if this will make it easier or harder for the victim to Capital-O-Own the city of Tampa. If all the accusations and accounts are true (naturally), I know which I will be rooting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. The city contracted with the Correctional Service provider
and agreed to the terms.

IMO they are just as liable even though they don't provide the services directly.

The Correctional Service provider should not be the one determining when, where, why, or how an inmate will be treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope she can sue the crap out of all of them.
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 08:57 AM by The Backlash Cometh
She can contact Amnesty International if she wants an organization which has been monitoring the abuses in Florida jails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:08 AM
Original message
.
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 09:09 AM by Hav
I hope someone gets sued good and fired.
Crazy lunatics like this medical supervisor shouldn't be in a position to make decisions like this. If it's against her beliefs, then she has the wrong job. Her job is to help other people, not to make decisions according to her religious beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. All three need to be sued and the defendents need to lose big time
The city
The service provider
and absolutely the medical supervisor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is so outrageous. The supervisor is saying, "My religion trumps your civil rights."
BTW, what about the hypocrisy involved in this situation? I'm 95% sure that supervisor is a repuke and against "big government" except where "big government" allows them to impose their religious beliefs on others.

This topic begs a question: would it be appropriate for DU to have an archive devoted specifically to civil rights violations?

It would come in handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. She should have never been in jail to begin with
The police were complete idiots on this one. She was raped, they should have realized it was a mistake and kept her at the hospital or something until they could clear the matter up.

The medical supervisor is wrong, too. If the pill was prescribed, she should not have gotten in the way. If she had a problem with it, she should have gotten another employee to distribute the medication. But really, the woman never should have been in jail to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. This one has my blood boiling. It is beyond comprehension how a victim of a violent rape
attack ends up arrested in the first place. Then to throw in some ignorant pig who thinks they have a right to decide what medical treatment she is to receive based on their "religious" beliefs. Anyone involved in her arrest and refusal of medical treatment should be thrown out the door. Also the medical supervisor should lose their license to practice. I would file a formal complaint with the board and sue to back it up and make sure they never have opportunity to do this to another woman. I also do not believe they should be running arrest warrants on victims of rape. I have to believe they judged the victim by her looks someway whether it be race or social class. I don't think this would have happened to any "socialite" even if they were wanted for murder. It is absolutely outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. hopefully she managed to take the pill
it says the rape occurred saturday night and she got out of jail on monday.

not that ANYTHING about this situation and the behavior of the polic and the jail staff is okay. But I just hope she got to take the pill despite those monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. That would have been enough time
I can't remember if it's within 48 hours or 72... still, even if she did (and I also really hope that she did) emotionally she was still victimized twice. Horrible situation. I hope the supervisor is canned ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
53. My doc told me you can take it up to 5 days afterword. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. But the more time that passes, the likelihood of implantation rises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. women, your uterus is state property (apparently)
this goes into the stratosphere for fascist behavior.

I hope this woman sues, and sues big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
76. Actually, it's more like it belongs to the Church
The state is only the enforcement arm in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaudacity Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am a pro-life democrat, and this is APPALLING
P.S. - please don't flame me, I am not out campaigning or anything. I just said it to point out that EVERYONE should be appalled by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I betcha every Dem is a pro-life Dem
You're an Anti-Choice Dem. Hey, that's your belief, and you're totally free to believe it. Just please, call it what it is without the RW framing.

Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. It's called No Choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Welcome to DU.
Now, just admit you're an anti-choice man, who doesn't think a woman should be allowed to have control over her body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. pro life? I'm a pro life Dem too. I'm also pro -choice, where I think
you meant to say anti-choice. I've got no right to dictate my beliefs upon another's body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. "I am a pro-life democrat"
Ah, so you're in favor of the U.S. instituting single-payer, universal healthcare so that babies won't have to die due to their parents not being able to afford medical treatment for their child? :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaudacity Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. yes, universal health care sounds good to me.
as i stated in another post, please don't let this thread about a rape victim degenerate into an abortion debate. That wasn't my intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. self delete...
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 04:38 PM by bliss_eternal
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. No flames... just a clarification.
but I think the other posters are trying to point out that what you mean is that you're against choice for everyone else's body. UNLESS you mean you're pro-life for yourself. Because, honestly, that's the only choice you need to worry about. You're own. I think the idea of pro-life is great, if you're only talking about yourself. It becomes anti-choice when you try to apply your own beliefs on my body.

As the bumper sticker says, "against abortion? Then don't have one".

ANd yes, everyone should be appalled at how this woman was treated. Frankly, I think it's total bullshit that they run a criminal background check on ALL sexual assault victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaudacity Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. THANK YOU
as I posted, I knew that it was a mistake, and that it would take away from the discussion. I don't know how all these people who came after me call themselves "pro-choice." I made a choice, and i get attacked. I would never do it. I would advise anyone I knew to not do it. If I was responsible for conceiving that baby, then I would be responsible for its well being. I understand that this is a women's rights issue, and I am not supposed to say anything because I am a man. If I could take half the responsibility for carrying the child for 9 months, believe me I would.

Please, do not respond to this post. I only included that information in the first place to illustrate the wide variety of people that should be outraged. This post is about someone who got raped. Lets not have it degenerate into something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. I didn't come after you, I just took away the RW framing
No one attacked you, we just clarified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
62. One has nothing to do with the other...
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 07:36 PM by bliss_eternal
Quote:
as I posted, I knew that it was a mistake, and that it would take away from the discussion. I don't know how all these people who came after me call themselves "pro-choice." I made a choice, and i get attacked.

The belief of pro-choice relates to a woman's right to reproductive health care. This has nothing to do with your choice to state your opinion, or your personal beliefs on a progressive board. Two entirely different choices.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
67. I am having difficulty seeing where it was you were attacked.
I am having trouble finding any degeneration into something else. I merely stated my stance, which does not mesh with yours. Luckily we're both allowed to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
77. one more clarification for you
you write: "If I was responsible for conceiving that baby, then I would be responsible for its well being."

Are you now saying a rape victim is responsible for the conception of a baby which was the result of a crime? Is she responsible for being raped, too?

You forget the subject of this post--it wasn't about being pro life, pro choice or anything else: it was about a woman who was raped by a perpetrator and then raped by the criminal justice system which is supposed to be in place to serve and protect her. Don't get offended by having your holier-than-thou "I'm better than you because I'm pro-life" rhetoric flung back in your teeth. You came here with an agenda. We're just calling you on it because it's so transparent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. PLEASE Label yourself as you choose.
Please do not think that all of us disagree with the expression you use to categorize your beliefs about abortion. If you wish to call yourself "Pro-Life", I hope you continue to do so whenever you wish. It's not as though ANYONE here is unaware of what you mean by it.

It saddens me to no end to see Democrats challenge another Democrat on this issue.

Even though I don't agree with your position, I will defend your right to it, and your right to adopt an expression for it, i.e. "Pro-Life".

Sometimes freedom of speech seriously goes out the window around here.

Welcome to DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Welcome to DU!
Thank you for stating that this is appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. I wonder if the medical supervisor would agree with
an executioner who refuses to carry out the death penalty because the executioner is Catholic? Does he have a right to refuse to do his job but still keep his job? I just have a feeling this particular supervisor is just fine with the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Someone needs to attach this outrage to
Rape-Gurney Joe's smug statement that a rape victim can always call a cab and go to another hospital if one place denies her the morning-after pill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. well done
there really are no words...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
68. Yep, that about
says it all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
26. What the hell...
I hope some people get fired for this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. Perhaps raping the supervisor and forcing her to carry a child....


would change this supervisor's thoughts about this kind of thing. Choice is still the law of the land. I take great joy in harassing protesters at the local reproductive rights clinics on Saturday mornings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
30. That supervisor should be on KO's worst
and the whole story needs to get national media attention.

I am so fed-up with those ignorant religious extremists...they are nothing more than the Christian Taliban. I bet that asshole is pro war and pro death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. I'm Totally Fed Up With Them.
I wonder when they're going to get over their Fad-Faux-Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. There just isn't enough punishment or restitution to make up for this
Firing the medical supervisor and sueing the police just isn't enough to make up for what this woman had to go through.

I'd like to see someone tarred and feathered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. The super needs to lose their job for such reckless behavior
To put ones own religious beliefs ahead of your job should make you disqualified to hold the job, period, end of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. This story needs more media attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. this is so sad. Why is there so much cruelty toward women
in Christian fundy states?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Sadly, there is cruelty toward women and minorities everywhere
The history of the United States is one of imperialism, colonization, genocide, and slavery. Is it any wonder, then, that cruelty toward those with less power continues to be a problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. It seems belief systems like organized religion
gives sanction to such things. It is hard to fight the edicts of an invisible authority figure.

Reminds me of what was said of Reagan. It was something like "he made us comfortable with our bigotry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #57
70. I often see and hear things that suggests that also. I love the Reagan quote. It is
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 07:44 AM by kikiek
so dead on. And what a great way to control people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. He was also the master of code words and symbolism
He kicked off his presidential campaign in Philadelphia Mississippi. The message was loud and clear that he was on the side of the segregationist. His visit to Bitburg was another nod to the extreme right. Before the trip he said he would not visit a concentration camp, but he did agree to lay a wreath on a Nazi memorial. His PR machine said that American and German soldiers were buried there, but that was a lie. It was an Nazi burial site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. My hope is that someday this country will be proud enough of its history that it will be the
truth. Not the made up propaganda crap designed to inspire blind patriotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. bush will not fare well. His incompetence is too
enormous to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. This is appalling
I am stunned. What is WITH people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Everyday more & more outrages.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
46. Sue the Fucking Cops and the Hospital!
Assholes!:mad: And throw "Failure to Protect" in the works!



They didn't have to arrest her! They could let her go. She's not a fucking Flight Risk!

She's a fucking Rape Victim for Christ sakes!!!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
51. Yet another reason why Florida and Texas stay on my do-noti-visit list
There are lots of other places I can take a vacation where they don't arrest rape victims, sentence mentally retarded juveniles to life in jail when they didn't understand their actions could kill someone, and steal elections.

Did you ever notice all these states with corrupted police and court systems have elected judges and district attorneys?

I hope her family sues the shit out of the Tampa police & jail system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
52. This strains the limits of an indifferent atheist.
Crap like this has me moving from indifferent atheist to activist atheist. I mean that woman had no right to withhold medical care, but tacit acceptance of her beliefs as somehow more important than those of others gave her the perceived right to do as she pleased. She was emboldened by the encouragement of her congregation and the indifference of those in society around her.

Sue them, sue them all...

Hell, let's have the name of the person who withheld care. Let's go visit her church. She's made the attitude of her pastor and congregation a matter of public policy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #52
72. That's a very good point, actually.
I'm neither atheist nor Christian. I'm a devout pagan. Incidents like this remind me of the brainwashing that goes on in too many institutions in the U.S. However, I do not hold Christianity or any organized religion at fault. Rather, it is the people themselves who create these sick institutions that encourage their members to cruelty and indifference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
54. The AP has picked up the story. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
55. Someone needs their ass kicked
This is really over the top.

As I'm looking over this I can only hear O'Reilly shrilling that the cops get a much bigger percentage than reported of women who say they're raped, but aren't.

I can just imagine him going on to say how women could lie and say they're raped to get sanctioned use of the drug and city employees should have religious rights, blah, blah.

I mean, O'Reilly is the guy who said the kidnapped kid was having fun being kidnapped. The dude is sick.

He has said on more than one occasion that ALL liberals hate America. I'm prior service and he's at the top of my list to have his ass kicked.

This story sickens me and the people who threw her in jail and kept her from the prescribed meds should all lose their jobs.

... and they should have their asses kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
56. This should be criminal!
Who the HELL was the supervisor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
64. Can't that supervisor get a job at a Walgreens pharmacy or something?
http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/news/4454234/detail.html

Walgreens policy allows pharmacists to refuse to dispense drugs they object to.

"If a pharmacist does refuse, we require the pharmacist to pass the prescription on to another pharmacist at that location, or to another pharmacy," a Walgreens spokesman told 12 News.


Or maybe as the medical expert* for Faux News...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
65. Why are they doing background criminal checks on rape victims?
Is this just a Florida thing, or should any woman who might have some sort of legal skeleton in her past avoid reporting a rape?

That medical supervisor needs to be prosecuted, and probably jailed, herself. That's just way, way, way over the line.

Unbelievable.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. That's a really scary idea. Why in the world would they have
any cause to do that?

Anyone with legal experience in FL have a clue? This makes no sense whatsoever, and seems a complete violation of her rights. It seems almost designed to prevent the reporting of rapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #66
73. I believe it IS probably designed to prevent the reporting of rapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. Sure; cut down on paperwork for all of those "stressed" Florida DAs.
Sick bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
69. The fundamentalist conservative police state,
courtesy of the Jeb Bushfuehrer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
71. The police said they did not have discretion in the arrest
And some agencies do not allow their officers discretion--a warrant equals arrest. However, the officers could have called their commander to allow them to avoid arrest on the warrant.

I am always amazed at the treatment of victims of sexual assault. They are ridiculed and blamed and treated as if the assault was their fault--sometimes even by their relatives. Police are no different, and I wonder if there is an element of blame-the-victim going on here, and that is why she was treated as she was. After all this warrant was not for a new crime, or for something that would cause them to believe she was a threat to the community.

I work with victims of sexual assault and you would not believe the treatment they receive at the hands of the people who are supposed to protect and support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC