|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 09:34 AM Original message |
USAToday - "Saddam ammo caches deadly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. But they aren't WMD and posed no threat to the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
2. but they had NO PLAN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well, that was lucky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
4. just another view of the breadth of the bush failure called the iraq war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. But there was plenty of troops to secure the oil fields |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lectrobyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yeah, but oil wells are more important to * than mere soldiers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why would people greeting us as liberators want to scarf up tons and tons of ammo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. The problemof unsecured munitions was apparent BEFORE the fall of Saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Remember the 350 tons of super-HE that we left unguarded in 2003? Gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yeah, and I've still got the pictures to prove it! Al Qaaqaa was the name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. What I remember that story hitting the presses right before the '04 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. The first thing our troops secured was the OIL WELLS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. We know where their priorities were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. Ohmygod, who would have thought it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. That's it! We need to go in there and take out Saddam NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
14. "Deadly"? Duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. AMMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC