|
I post about this roughly twice a month. There really is very little interest in this topic right now, in spite of (and maybe because of) concern over Global Warming. A return to ice age conditions is counter-intuitive, and brings out the Ironickal Skeptick in many people -- "First it's Global Warming, now it's an Ice Age! You just can't trust them durned perfessers!"
My postings usually get about four hits. Two weeks ago, I posted nearly identical pieces at the same time. One of them was titled something like "Climate change could bring on little Ice Age", and the other one was "Millions of cats face death by freezing." You can guess which got two hits, and which got eight.
Yes, I'm a wise-ass, but a wise-ass informed by the Younger-Dry-ass. (Get it, that's a hybrid DU and Climatology joke.) But such a climate change would result in an enormous set of disasters, including famines, mass migrations of Europeans, Canadians, and people from Northern Asia, increased desertification, greatly increased hurricane and tornado development, and a much greater demand on our ever-more-expensive fossil fuel supplies.
This has been one of my serious interests since the early studies of the THC (Thermohaline Circulation) were published in the late 1970s. I have compiled a list of reliable indicators of a return of an "interstadial" (ice-age) climatic regime, and most of the indicators are now active, with very few counter-indicators arguing against the ice.
Naturally, many DUers assume I fall into the right-wing camp on this issue, since I am convinced this is a primarily natural phenomenon. But I don't -- in fact, human involvement in the ecosphere has probably accelerated the change by 2000-5000 years. The fact that human beings change the weather was demonstrated by the Right itself in the week following 9/11, when pResident Bush grounded all aircraft, and the meteorological community remarked on the significant changes in the weather around the world.
My "prediction", as it currently stands, is that we will enter the early stages of a Younger-Dryas type of an era well within 50 years; and that the odds are better than 50/50 that this will deepen into a full glacial period within 1000 years. By the way, this is not a psychic prediction, but a prediction I make based on the evidence of past ice ages, "little" and otherwise. Since the newer, colder era will probably start during the cold phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, the next five to seven years could mark the start of this era, when the cold phase of the PDO should be at its maximum.
(So why don't the "Professional" climatologists make such predictions? Well, most PhDs with teaching positions or politically-sensitive posts in the USGS have families, i.e., children to feed, mortgages to pay, and reputations to protect from "hard-headed thinkers" like Bill O'Reilly and John Stossel. Better that a libbrul crank like Yours Truly make an ass of himself than someone who has taken on the un-sexy work of actually developing the evidence I have seen fit to abuse.)
An abrupt return to a Y-D climate around 2025, when petroleum is expected to be much more expensive, and natural gas just about unobtainable, would be even more catastrophic. At least if the "cold snap" hits over the next few years, we will have enough energy capacity to handle it, though we may have to lay aside our jolly little jihad against Islam for the time being.
If the ice comes back down around 2045 without well-designed energy and disaster management policies in place, to paraphrase that hearalded American folk philosopher Laurence Tereaux, "I pity the fools."
There is currently enough lay scientific interest in climate issues that if, and when, the North Atlantic THC disappears, it will become immediate front-page news, and it will also probably trigger and economic panic due to the prospect of Europe becoming a tundra immediately and buried under a thousand feet of ice within a few centuries. The movie The Day After Tomorrow, an adaptation of Art Bell and Whitley Strieber's The Coming Global Superstorm will certainly heighten public interest in the topic, especially if this winter turns out to be snowier than usual (as it already has been for most of the country).
Sorry to disappoint my one or two "fans" that this posting has mainly been a rambling rant. I really ought to work up a piece for the DU Articles page. Maybe Kitty Cats Face Immanent Extinction.
:)
--bkl Colder but Wiser.
ps- Yes, Mr. T's name really is Laurence Tereaux, at least as reported by TV Guide when The A-Team was popular -- and provided I am not going into premature senility.
|