Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Historians Fight Bush on Access to Papers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:14 PM
Original message
NYT: Historians Fight Bush on Access to Papers
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/books/08arch.html?hp

In December 1989, one month after the fall of the Berlin Wall, President George H. W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev met in Malta and, in the words of a Soviet spokesman, “buried the cold war at the bottom of the Mediterranean.”

The Russian transcript of that momentous summit was published in Moscow in 1993. Fourteen years later American historians are still waiting for their own government to release a transcript.

Now lawmakers and scholars are hoping to pry open the gateway to such archival documents by lifting what they say has been a major obstacle to historical research: a directive issued by the current Bush White House in 2001 that has severely slowed or prevented the release of important presidential papers.

“I visited the Bush library in 1999, expecting to be able to look at” the Malta transcript, said Thomas S. Blanton, executive director of an independent research institute called the National Security Archive at George Washington University. He filed a Freedom of Information Act request but said, “I still don’t have it, and there’s no telling when I will.”

President George W. Bush’s 2001 executive order restricted the release of presidential records by giving sitting presidents the power to delay the release of papers indefinitely, while extending the control of former presidents, vice presidents and their families. It also changed the system from one that automatically released documents 30 days after a current or former president is notified to one that withholds papers until a president specifically permits their release.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. At some point in the future,
someone will be elected on a platform of opening the doors to these secrets, how bad do they want to be elected vs how bad do they need the money.

Such a dilemma, I almost feel sorry for them, having to make such a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was critical that the BFEE get Little Boots in the White House, at all costs.
His number 1 task: seal all his father's presidential papers and thereby silence the ghosts of Iran-Contra.

Thank you, Sandra Day O'Connor. What a bright shining star you were in the SCOTUS constellation. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Soon conservatives won't like that executive order
Baby Bush effectively made it easier for the Clintons to pick and choose what archives are opened up to the public and what archives they would like to keep sealed. All of those conservative scholars and authors who are chomping at the bit to get into the Clinton archives may find themselves sorely disappointed when they look for papers about Whitewater or "Travelgate" or Monicagate. Bush's order allows the Clintons to seal all of that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. So I gather that Bush* can just override any Congressional Law at will
This was an Act of Congress that was signed into Law. From what I know of the Constitution only Congress can write Law. Once a Law has been passed everyone has to follow it including the President. I guess that is no longer a valid conclusion.. Bush* wrote his own law and no one has complained about it so I guess under our new and improved government of an "Unitary Executive" Laws are only made for the common folk and they can be made by executive decision...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, Congress is merely an advisory body now.
I expect he will "dismiss Congress" one of these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC