Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update: Hearing Highlights Vet Tracking Woes (too expensive to implement)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:08 PM
Original message
Update: Hearing Highlights Vet Tracking Woes (too expensive to implement)
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 04:12 PM by brooklynite
The Department of Veterans Affairs scrapped an early effort to track returning war casualties because it was too expensive to implement, a senior official confirmed today before a congressional panel.

ABC News yesterday reported a former VA employee said the department did not implement a 2004 plan that would have ensured injured veterans received timely care and benefits. As a result, some wounded vets have suffered as they waited for disability payments and proper care.

News of the program's shelving prompted outrage from some quarters. "I am not convinced the Veterans Affairs Department is doing its part," said Rep. Harry E. Mitchell, D-Ariz., chairman of the panel, in prepared remarks. Mitchell said he was "deeply troubled" by the report.

Dr. Michael J. Kussman, the VA's acting undersecretary for health, said the program, known as the Contingency Tracking System (CTS), was designed only to handle information related to veterans' benefits, not their health care, and would have been too expensive to adapt. "It could not meet needs, or even all of needs, without significant additional development costs," Kussman said without citing specific figures.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/update_hearing_.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. yesterday's abcblog-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x367648
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/under_va_chief_.html


Under VA Chief, Effort to Aid Wounded Vets Stalled, Ex-Employee Charges

A proposal to keep seriously wounded vets from falling through he cracks of the bureaucracy was shelved in 2005 when Jim Nicholson took over as the secretary of the Veterans Affairs Department, according to the former VA employee who was responsible for tracking war casualties.

The program, called the Contingency Tracking System, had been approved by Nicholson's predecessor but died once Nicholson took over the VA, Sullivan told ABC News.

Sullivan said he was told the cost of the system -- less than $1 million to build and requiring a handful of staff to maintain -- was prohibitive.

"I don't think it's a good idea for the people responsible for the problem to be in charge of fixing it," he told ABC News.

In a written response to ABC News, the VA said a new tracking system "very near deployment" would allow them to track casualties soon after they left the battlefield, much the way CTS was designed to do in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One million dollars. Period. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. March issue of Vanity Fair
The #1 federal contractor is SAIC - Science Applications International Corp. They have 9,000 contracts presently, two are for $1 billion and over a hundred are $10 million a piece. They specialize in information warfare, information dominance, surveillance, weapons and more.

They employ retired executive appointees (CIA, DOD, NSA, FBI etc.), military officers and fought for years to have Saddam Hussein taken out.

For billlions upon billions they track all kinds of things for the government and especially the iraw war.

Guess the military-industrial complex does not concern itself with the soldiers though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. absolutely infuriating.
k & r.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC