Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Martha B. Sosman, Mass. Supreme Court Judge Who Voted Against Gay Marriage, Dead At 56

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 06:43 AM
Original message
Martha B. Sosman, Mass. Supreme Court Judge Who Voted Against Gay Marriage, Dead At 56
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 07:18 AM by IanDB1
How sad for her and her family that history will best remember her as the judge who opposed Marriage Equality.

AP - 3/11/2007 4:54 PM - Updated 3/11/2007 4:55 PM

BOSTON (AP) _ Martha B. Sosman, one of three Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court judges who voted against the landmark decision legalizing gay marriage in the state, has died, the court said Sunday. She was 56.

<snip>

Republican Gov. Paul Cellucci hailed Sosman as a ``conservative'' jurist when he appointed her to the high court as an associate justice in 2000.

In 2003, when a high court ruling made Massachusetts the first state in the nation to legalize gay marriage, Sosman wrote a strenuous dissent for the court's minority. In her opinion, she belittled the majority's advisory opinion, saying that it ``merely repeats the impassioned rhetoric'' of gay marriage advocates.

She said the argument to define gay partnerships as marriages versus civil unions was ``a squabble over the names to be used.''

In the majority opinion, Marshall chided Sosman, writing that she ``so clearly misses the point that further discussion appears to be useless.''

Gov. Deval Patrick will appoint a new justice to serve on the seven-judge panel.

More:
http://www.kotv.com/news/national/story/?id=122203

See also:

March 12, 2007
Mass. Supreme Court Judge Who Voted Against Gay Marriage Dies
http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2007/03/mass-supreme-court-judge-who-voted.html


See also:


Justice Sosman of the SJC dies at 56
Opposed legalizing same-sex marriage
By David Abel, Globe Staff | March 12, 2007

Justice Martha B. Sosman of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, whose 2000 appointment gave the state's highest court its first female majority, died Saturday of respiratory failure, court officials said.

The 56-year-old jurist had been diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005.

Justice Sosman, a former board member of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and a founding partner of an all-female law firm in Boston, surprised some in the legal community by joining two other justices in dissent against the landmark 2003 decision legalizing same-sex marriage. She wrote that the majority opinion "merely repeats the impassioned rhetoric" of same-sex marriage advocates.

"A quick review of the résumé makes people leap to various conclusions about me," she told the Globe three years ago. "The five-woman firm, the involvement with Planned Parenthood, I think added to this image that I was going to be this crusading feminist liberal whatnot, which is certainly not what I am."

<snip>

"I always respected the integrity she brought to the bench and her awesome intellectual power," said Ellen J. Zucker, a Boston lawyer who argued before her on multiple occasions. "But she had, in my experience, a narrower view of what the legal system could accomplish and what it is obliged to accomplish to secure people's rights. That said, I had enormous respect for her."

More:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/03/12/justice_sosman_of_the_sjc_dies_at_56/?rss_id=Boston+Globe+--+City%2FRegion+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are we sure she wasn't just raptured?
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 08:16 AM by Deep13
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Uh... Martha? Breast cancer? She?
DId you even read the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. oops fixed
Skimmed it. Can't say I'm really all that interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Respiratory failure her family said was cause of death
Only lasted six years on the bench. Not long for a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. She was a member of Planned Parenthood. Is hating gays more Xian than being pro-choice? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually yes...
...St. Paul in his letter to the Romans specifically condemns male homosexuality. Of course there are numberous examples of this in the OT, not least of which is the smiting of Sodom. I'm unaware of any Biblical prohibition on abortion. In fact, the OT specifically condones infanticide as long as the victims are the children of pagans. What is more, until fairly recently (1800s) the Catholic church permitted abortion prior to "quickening" when fetal movement became palpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Psalm 137:9
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 10:30 AM by IanDB1
"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." --Psalm 137:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Exactly!The Bible doesn't condemn hot woman-on-woman sex though!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It might, I just can't remember where I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. You'd be hard-pressed to find
someone who believes in same-sex marriage more than me, but to say that any jurist who votes a certain way on the issue does so out of personal hatred is just wrong.

I have no idea what she felt about gays, but good justices don't vote solely based on their own feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Who is to say she was a good justice? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Who's to say she hated gays?
I never said she was a good justice. YOU said she hated gays.

I merely pointed out that it's possible for a jurist to not hate gays, and still rule against their wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. She certainly acted irrationally to do them harm. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. A crocodile tear rolls slowly down my cheek. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. God rest her soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC