Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:01 PM
Original message
Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 03:03 PM by Barrett808
Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'
By Tom Harper, Sunday Telegraph

Scientists who questioned mankind's impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.

They say the debate on global warming has been "hijacked" by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions.

Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.

(more)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/11/ngreen211.xml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Death threats are illegal and should be prosecuted.
But I'm 100% in favor of the shunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you serious?
I think it's a fig newton of his imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. uh huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's easy to say they're getting threats or even falsify them
To gain sympathy on an entirely unscientific foundation for their current standpoint. I think they should definitely be shunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Welcome to DU, Ends!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Some of these "experts" have proven they can be paid to lie.
This may be more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. HELL IT'S POSSIBLE

WE GOT A PRESIDENT,A VICE PRESIDENT,A YES MAN(LIBBY) WHO HELPED STAR A WAR LYING!
AND THEY'VE BEEN PAID WELL FOR IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. That's the first thing that popped into my head. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course they're being shunned
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 03:08 PM by depakid
and they're not publishing in peer reviewed journals, either because their opinions are a crock of shit and show an utter lack of scientific integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. its true
They're being paid to mislead the public.
They might be skilled shills, but they left science behind when the Exxon check arrived.
Perhaps they can earn a future living trashing evolution on the fundie circuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why would you turn to the Freeper Michael Rivero for any information?
The guy made his mark by being among the first and loudest spreading Vince Foster conspiracy theories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Here's your clue:
"...the loss of acedemic freedom has real!"

Please diagram and explain the meaning of the above 7 words. Come on, I dare you. And no laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure the police will sort out any alleged death threats.
As for the shunning, that's entirely reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. This guys is a serial liar...
.. no reason to beleive the death threats are even true. He has lied about his degrees, his work experiance, being the firt PhD in Climatology and obviously about global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. WELL SAID

I CAN CI BY UR SPELIN UR AN EXPURT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nothing about police investigating his claims of threats
He could just as easily have someone or himself email him a threat to make it look it too.

Just because someone is a scientist doesn't mean they are intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. This is the Telegraph, after all.
Still a bastion of conservative reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's what happens when Polar Bears learn to use email!
:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Timothy Ball" is a fraud
astroturf scientist funded by big oil - you'll be seeing him a lot
quoted by Hannity.
It's too bad he's getting threats, those that do should
be prosecuted, and it just inflates his self importance.
---------
http://www.desmogblog.com/tim-ball-finding-new-ways-to-fudge-his-credentials

In a September 26, 2006 letter to the Royal Society, Dr. Tim Ball, the leading signatory, identifies himself as "Professor of Climatology, University of Winnipeg."
Not quite. From 1988 until his retirement in 1996, Dr. Ball was a Professor of Geography at that university. He has not, since, had any official position at U of W or at any university. So, he is not now a Professor of Climatology at the University of Winnipeg and, arguably, never was.

It raises the question: if he is this cavalier about the factual accuracy of his own record of employment and credentials, how could he expect us to believe any of the rest of what he says?

------
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/10/113157/62
In 1996, Dr. Ball left his job at the University of Winnipeg for the more lucrative pursuit of scientific gun-for-hire ("environmental consultant"). According to the Center for Media and Democracy SourceWatch, he found a home at the American National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative front group supporting whatever initiatives their financial backers want them to endorse. Since 1997, one of their principal mandates has been to fight the environment movement in general and in particular, shoot down any regulation to decrease the emission of greenhouse gasses.


"CFCs were never a problem... it's only because the sun is changing" and, "What's wrong with global warming ? There are lots of positive benefits to global warming."
It seems as though Tim Ball traded his professional pride and ethics for easy money and an invitation to play with the big boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Thanks, very informative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. well how many haven't received death threats? Hmm?
why is the telegraph not reporting that huh?

color my skeptical on this one, i'm selling some bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Interesting FYI: Ball and Exxon
http://www.nationalcenter.org/2006/05/seven-degrees-of-exxonmobil.html

In this case, Dr. Tim Ball is attacked for giving a policy briefing to a Canadian think-tank, the Fraser Institute. That event brings out Mr. Gutstein's long knives.

First, the well-respected, 32-year-old think-tank that invited Dr. Ball, according to Mr. Gutstein, receives one percent of its funding from ExxonMobil. So, according to Gutstein's Theory (which holds that even slight connections to major U.S. corporations are inherently wholly corrupting), Dr. Ball's entire professional integrity is compromised by appearing -- after retiring from 28 years as a professor of climatology -- at a major think-tank with a one percent ExxonMobil link.

But wait, there's more evidence.

Dr. Ball also, says Mr. Gutstein, is "promoted by" The National Center for Public Policy Research (us), which, the critic says, has received $225,000 from ExxonMobil.

<snip>
I want to be fair, though. Donald Gutstein of Simon Fraser University has yet more evidence.

Dr. Ball, like Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit fame (and many others), has had some op-eds published on Tech Central Station. Tech Central Station lists ExxonMobil as one of eight corporations sponsoring its site. No claim is made by Mr. Gutstein that Dr. Ball received compensation from Tech Central Station for his op-eds published there.

But Mr. Gutstein is not done. The evidence against Dr. Ball continues to mount. Mr. Gutstein says, "He's a hot topic on the Coalblog Web site, www.coal.ca/blog/?p=134, sponsored by the coal companies." Coal=evil. (Darth Vader isn't the color of coal by accident, you know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. And *who* are these scientists?
Are they bought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. They can't convince the scientific world, ...
so they play to public sympathy.

But anyone who might actually be making death threats against these quacks is not doing any favor for science, nor for the fight to avert the consequences of human activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, of course they could always publish, but for some reason they're avoiding peer review...
...Kind of like how Bjorne Lomborg circumvented peer review to write The Skeptical Environmentalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Gosh, I hope this is NOT true (hard to believe it is true)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Okay, lets see the letters...
I will believe it when I see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
27. Timothy Ball is a liar and a nut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. this is a typical republick party tactic.
your message is shown to be shit -- so then accuse those who have dissected your lying ass of extreme measures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC