Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army reinstates bonus for active-duty GIs who re-enlist while in war zones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:42 AM
Original message
Army reinstates bonus for active-duty GIs who re-enlist while in war zones
ARLINGTON, Va. — Effective immediately, active-duty soldiers who re-enlist while deployed to Kuwait, Iraq or Afghanistan will receive a tax-free, lump-sum bonus, which for most will exceed $5,000, Army officials said Thursday.

The bonus is the much-anticipated reinstatement of a flat rate, $5,000 sign-up stipend that was in effect for just two weeks in late September.

The bonus expired Sept. 30, when the Army’s fiscal 2003 funds ran out for the program. Since then, Army officials have been working to secure funds to continue the bonus, which was a highly effective re-enlistment tool.

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=19414

Comment: If it was so "highly effective," why did the DoD have to reinstate it? When DoD first implemented it, our soldiers had just 11 days to decide. 'Course, it helps when your pay is all screwed up and your spouse can't pay the rent back home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I reckon they're stalling the "draft" for as long as possible.
The U.S. is bribing or buying off everyone else, so, why not U.S. soldiers in a crisis situated in a war zone?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was "generous" of the DoD to formulate a potential bonus increase
over the initial flat rate when the DoD really didn't have to, considering the flat rate had been so "successful" the first time around.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC