http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=25190“I would argue that we cannot condone torture by codifying a list of exceptional situations in which techniques of torture might be legitimately used,” Mohler wrote. “At the same time, I would also argue that we cannot deny that there could exist circumstances in which such uses of torture might be made necessary.”
Snip
"Heimbach told Baptist Press that evangelicals should support government application of coercive force to non-cooperating prisoners as long as those methods are limited to just war boundaries."
Ah yes, coming back to the sinner's fold of 'moral relativism.' Long the favorite criticism of the fundies against "libruls" the idea that morality is a convenience, they themselves land fully in the relativism camp: If its them bad guys, torture is OK with Baptists.
This long screed explains the Southern Baptist position on why it won't participated in the anti torture movement, an explaination that is torturous itself, relying on the argument that the document are unclear or could be stated better. so therefore, we stand fully behind torture when it is against people we do not like.
Who would Jesus torture? By their acceptance of "circumstances" they open the door for our troops to be dealt with in the same manner. I'm getting ill...