Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethicist: NAE torture declaration 'irrational' AKA Baptists for Torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:14 PM
Original message
Ethicist: NAE torture declaration 'irrational' AKA Baptists for Torture
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 04:16 PM by triguy46
http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=25190

“I would argue that we cannot condone torture by codifying a list of exceptional situations in which techniques of torture might be legitimately used,” Mohler wrote. “At the same time, I would also argue that we cannot deny that there could exist circumstances in which such uses of torture might be made necessary.”

Snip

"Heimbach told Baptist Press that evangelicals should support government application of coercive force to non-cooperating prisoners as long as those methods are limited to just war boundaries."

Ah yes, coming back to the sinner's fold of 'moral relativism.' Long the favorite criticism of the fundies against "libruls" the idea that morality is a convenience, they themselves land fully in the relativism camp: If its them bad guys, torture is OK with Baptists.

This long screed explains the Southern Baptist position on why it won't participated in the anti torture movement, an explaination that is torturous itself, relying on the argument that the document are unclear or could be stated better. so therefore, we stand fully behind torture when it is against people we do not like.

Who would Jesus torture? By their acceptance of "circumstances" they open the door for our troops to be dealt with in the same manner. I'm getting ill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah. 'Cause Jesus would have really approved of torturing
people.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who cares if it's "irrational"...
...the obvious point is, it's f*ck*ng anti-Christian!!! :argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey. They have Biblical authority for this!
It's right there in Exceptions, Chapter Five, Verses 6-11:

"Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, EXCEPT for scummy liberals and Mooslim terra-ists. Blessed are the peacemakers, EXCEPT for those treasonous reptiles who make peace with Enemies of That Blessed State Which Shall Come To Be Called Amurka. Feed thou the hungry, and comfort the bereft, EXCEPT those abandoned evil-doers who want to be free to love whomever I shall imbue within them the impulse to love, if I then imbue them with the impulse to love them of their own gender. Give hospitality unto the stranger within your gates, EXCEPT those illegal brown immigrants who do vilely taketh thy grueling, low-paying jobs wherein the employers treateth them like sewage. Judge not, lest ye be judged, EXCEPT those colossal poltroons who disputeth thy political opinions. It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven EXCEPT those rich men who sitteth on the board of Kellogg, Brown and Root, Exxon-Mobil, Dupont Chemicals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and any large insurance corporation."

See? Y'all just aren't reading the right PART of the Bible.

explicatorially,
Bright

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. nice. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carla Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, there is a passage
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 03:15 AM by carla
John 15:6, in which jesus is "quoted" as saying 'If a man abide not in me...cast them into the fire, and they are burned.' Edited for brevity, but the suggestion is that the "mythssia" advocates torture of unbelievers. Unbelievers, enemies, six of one, half a dozen of the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Edited to within an inch of its life, I'd say...
The complete verse, in the standard NRSV translation, reads as follows:

Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.


In other words, it's referring to the eternal destiny of those who do not follow Christ. Whether it's to be thought of literally in terms of hellfire and brimstone, or symbolically in terms of one becoming useless to do good and unable to perceive the presence of God, what it certainly cannot be stretched to mean is that believers are to enact judgment against unbelievers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. In as much as you've done it unto the least of these
You've done it unto me - Jesus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC