Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Amid Concerns, FBI Lapses Went On

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 10:43 PM
Original message
WP: Amid Concerns, FBI Lapses Went On
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 10:50 PM by Pirate Smile
Amid Concerns, FBI Lapses Went On
Records Collection Brought Internal Questions But Little Scrutiny


By R. Jeffrey Smith and John Solomon
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, March 18, 2007; Page A01

FBI counterterrorism officials continued to use flawed procedures to obtain thousands of U.S. telephone records during a two-year period when bureau lawyers and managers were expressing escalating concerns about the practice, according to senior FBI and Justice Department officials and documents.

-snip-
Under pressure to provide a stronger legal footing, counterterrorism agents last year wrote new letters to phone companies demanding the information the bureau already possessed. At least one senior FBI headquarters official -- whom the bureau declined to name -- signed these "national security letters" without including the required proof that the letters were linked to FBI counterterrorism or espionage investigations, an FBI official said.

The flawed procedures involved the use of emergency demands for records, called "exigent circumstance" letters, which contained false or undocumented claims. They also included national security letters that were issued without FBI rules being followed. Both types of request were served on three phone companies.

-snip-
The use of such letters was virtually "uncontrolled," said an FBI official who was briefed on the issue in early 2005. By that fall, CAU agents had begun creating spreadsheets to track phone records they had collected for a year or more that were not covered by the appropriate documents, according to FBI e-mails and interviews with officials.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/17/AR2007031701451.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it's their position that the telcos are immune from consequences
because the telcos are supposed to blindly help even if the national security letters violate the FBI's own procedures. So what's the incentive to follow the rules? At all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R - "phantoms of lost liberties" manifesting...
nt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. And we have yet another scandal for Congress to investigate.
Somehow, these telephone companies need to be held liable, along with whatever officials at the federal level, for simply handing over this information. Several ISP's have wised up and automatically demand that the governmental agency provide proof/standing for their information/records request.

Anyone whose privacy rights were compromised should be able to sue. Hitting these companies in their pocketbooks is the only way they will take this violation seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC