Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush loyalist among fired U.S. attorneys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Original message
Bush loyalist among fired U.S. attorneys
Source: LA TIMES

SAN FRANCISCO — The "company man" hired and fired by the Bush administration as U.S. attorney in San Francisco was a loyal Republican the administration wanted to keep on — until it appeared he could become a public relations liability.

Unlike seven other fired federal prosecutors who may have run afoul of the administration for political reasons, San Francisco U.S. Atty. Kevin Ryan was a team player for Bush and had influential Republican support. A friend of the president even went to bat for Ryan after his firing.

"You would have to know Kevin," said UC Hastings College of the Law professor Rory Little. "You can't find a stronger supporter of the Bush administration agenda." His tenure, however, was plagued by morale problems and accusations that he was a bad manager. A number of the office's most experienced lawyers left.

Despite his problems, which were well documented in legal newspapers, Justice officials wanted to keep Ryan on, even as they plotted the firings of other U.S. attorneys. It was only when a Democratic judge threatened to go to Congress to raise a public fuss over an excoriating written evaluation of Ryan's office that Ryan was put on the termination list, according to e-mails released by the White House.

Ryan's critics persuaded Justice that his firing "could avoid the release of documents" highly critical of his management style, Little said.



Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/state/la-me-ryan22mar22,1,4654491,full.story?coll=la-news-state&ctrack=1&cset=true



.......from TPM regarding this article.......

Today's Must Read
By Paul Kiel - March 22, 2007, 9:16 AM

It's almost too perfect. The only U.S. attorney fired by the administration in December who undeniably had performance issues was begrudingly added to the list at the last minute -- and only then because of a federal judge's threat that he would go to Congress with complaints about the prosecutor's performance.

The Los Angeles Times tells the story of San Francisco's Kevin Ryan today, who, as the scandal over the firings began to simmer early this year, telephoned the Justice Department to assure them that he's still a "company man."

Ryan only was added to the list in early December, after a federal judge warned the Justice Department that she was "going to ask members of Congress to get her a copy of the blistering evaluations the department had done of Ryan earlier that year." The emails strongly suggest that Ryan was fired in order to prevent that from happening.

Just let that sink in. In the only case where there was a strong case for firing, the DoJ had to be extorted to do it.

It was not always that way at the DoJ. Remember that, before he left in August of 2005, then-Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty generated his own list of U.S. attorneys to be fired. Only his list was completely different from the list finally generated by Alberto Gonzales' deputy, Kyle Sampson -- save one name: Kevin Ryan.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002841.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. So this one actually deserved to be fired, and the WH didn't want to fire him?
Too sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Loyalty is a qualification. Competence isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Actually incompetence is a requirement. Smart lackeys just cause problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. RW talking heads will point to him for validation for all of the firings.
Betcha a buck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. The problem with that is that he was a last-minute add-on
and if they point out his lousy evaluations, it will make the very positive evaluations of the other eight even more obvious. Not sure that this will help them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. They got one right. So what? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, they tried very hard to shield this one from firing....
until a Federal Judge threatened to go to Congress so the only reason he, belatedly, was on the list was not because he was incompetent but only to keep Congress from finding out via the Judge and investigating what was happening at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly and that is why this post should be recommended
this story proves that the DoJ firing of 8 USAs WAS political.


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. This sounds irrefutable
I'm surprised the WH didn't go into "Rove mode" to discredit and remove that courageous judge. This story should definitely be out there along with the others. I would like to see the RW minions try to spin this story. Thank you for posting this. k&r



:kick:

INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. A "Bushie" guilty of incompetence...hard to believe isn't it?
Look up incompetence in the Webster's Dictionary and they use GOP as their example...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8.  "In the only case where there was a strong case for firing, the DoJ had to be extorted to do it."
- Paul Kiel (TPM)


Kicking again :kick:


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Got to admit it's getting better
getting better all the time...

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Shark poaching and the Unification Church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. whihc is the same as going after a republican....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC